Kinsman v. Unocal Asbestos case: Respondent Attorneys

The following attorneys/law firms represent the respondents in the Kinsman v. Unocal asbestos case.

Attorneys for Respondent:
Law Offices of Daniel U. Smith, Daniel U. Smith, Ted W. Pelletier; Wartnick, Chaber, Harowitz & Tigerman, The Wartnick Law Firm, Harvey F. Wartnick, Charles C. Kelly II, Steven M. Harowitz, Stephen M. Tigerman and Richard A. Brody for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

James C. Sturdevant; Sharon Arkin; The Arns Law Firm, Morgan C. Smith, Jonathan E. Davis and Robert S. Arns for Consumer Attorneys of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, Mark G. Bonino and Elisa Nadeau for American International Companies as Amicus Curiae.

Counsel who argued in Supreme Court (not intended for publication with opinion):
Stephen E. Norris
Horvtiz & Levy
15760 Ventura Boulevard, 18th Floor
Encino, CA 91436
(818) 995-0800

Daniel U. Smith
Law Offices of Daniel U. Smith
Post Office Box 278
Kentfield, CA 94914
(415) 461-5630

Courtesy of http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S118561.PDF

Other helpful links:

Asbestos Asbestos
Asbestos and lung cancer Asbestos and lung cancer
Mesothelioma attorney Mesothelioma attorney
Mesothelioma Lawyer Mesothelioma lawyer
Asbestos attorney Asbestos attorney