HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE
English En Français

FREE LEGAL REVIEW

First Name
Last Name
Home Phone
Work Phone
City and State
Email
Were you diagnosed with Asbestosis? Yes
No
Were you diagnosed with lung cancer? Yes
No
Were you diagnosed with Mesothelioma? yes
no
What is your date of diagnosis?
Additional Comments
Best time to call?

Asbestos Disease Report: Data Limitations and Permissible Limits

Read the report from the CDC regarding the lung diseases associated with exposure to asbestos and other carcinogens. This section details data limitations and exposure level limits.

Although OSHA adopted permissible exposure limits (PELs) of 0.1 mg/m3 for quartz and 0.05 mg/m3 for cristobalite that were enforced from March 1, 1989 through March 22, 1993, neither OSHA nor MSHA currently has a PEL specific to any form of crystalline silica. Instead, the relevant PELs are for respirable dust containing crystalline silica. These PELs take the form of formulas in which the PEL for respirable dust is reduced as the crystalline silica content of the dust increases. The PEL formulas vary with the agency and the industry, but, with all of them, the effective allowable exposure to quartz is less than or equal to 0.1 mg/m3 and the effective allowable exposure to cristobalite is less than or equal to 0.05 mg/m3, regardless of silica content. Thus, the percentage of OSHA samples exceeding the PEL is greater in the years when the formula PEL is applied (in this report, all years except 1989 through 1993) than it would be if a 0.1 mg/m3 quartz or 0.05 mg/m3 cristobalite PEL had been applied for these years. Readers should keep the preceding explanation in mind when considering data presented in this report showing apparent temporal discontinuities in the annual percentage of OSHA silica samples exceeding the PEL.

The percentage of respirable coal mine dust samples exceeding the PEL was calculated using the MSHA PEL of 2 mg/m3 MRE for respirable coal mine dust containing no more than 5% quartz. Because the quartz content could not be reliably identified for most of the respirable coal mine dust samples, no attempt was made to use the MSHA formula for reducing the PEL when the quartz content exceeded 5%. Thus, as presented in this report, the percentage of respirable coal mine dust samples exceeding the PEL is a lower limit, and the actual percentage exceeding the PEL is very likely higher than reported.

Courtesy of the CDC

Other helpful links:

Asbestos
Asbestos and lung cancer
Mesothelioma attorney
Mesothelioma lawyer
Asbestos attorney

Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos


IN THIS SECTION
Asbestos report on mortality data has limitations
Limitations of asbestos disease mortality data
Limitations of asbestos disease mortality data
Data limitations in CDC asbestos mortality report
Data limitations in asbestos exposure report
Permissible asbestos exposure limits
Limitations of disease data regarding MSHA samples


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Asbestos
Asbestos Help
Asbestos Cancer

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

Limitations of asbestos disease mortality data Continued discussion of data limitations in asbestos disease report
Government report discusses limitations on asbestos disease data

Data limitations in CDC asbestos mortality report More discussion of data limitations in CDC asbestos report
CDC report discusses specific limitations of asbestos disease data

CDC asbestos report Comprehensive asbestos report with work-related lung disease data
A federal asbestos report on work-related lung disease