The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Choose Us   Settlements   Search

Previous Investigations Other Litigations Bextra Research Center News & Warnings Drug Publications

Letters

in this section: Bextra Safety Alert 2002


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

FDA Bextra Letters - Without a Bextra recall, Bextra is still deadly

These are letters from the FDA issuing warnings and safety alerts for consumers about possible adverse reactions from taking the drug Bextra. Even though there has been no Bextra recall, Bextra, as these letters show, can still be dangerous.

In 2002, the FDA acknowledged an addition to Bextra's Warnings' section indicating for the possibility of serious skin diseases and allergic reactions to occur and that this drug is now contraindicated with the use of Warfarin.

Bextra Warning Letter on Skin Reactions

This is a letter from Pfizer indicating their submission of Bextra's Warnings' section for the possibility of serious skin diseases and allergic reactions to occur and that this drug is now contraindicated with the use of Warfarin.

Bextra Safety Alert 2002

Weitz & Luxenberg is no longer accepting Bextra cases.


see also:

Bextra Safety Alert 2002 Bextra Litigation - Bextra Lawyers - Bextra Safety Alert 2002
This is the text of a letter from Pharmacia and Pfizer. Contact the companies for a copy of any referenced enclosures.

Public Comments Public Comments on Possibility of Bextra Lawsuit
Some of these comments may have bearing on your Bextra lawsuit.

Drug Publications Bextra Arthritis Drug Publications - Food and Drug Administration
Publications on the Arthritis drug Bextra provided by the FDA

Free Legal Review:
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:



For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims