United States Office of Water EPA 440/5-80-035
Environmental Protection Regulations and Standards October 1980
Agency Criteria and Standards Division
Washington, D. C. 20460
EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Chromium
AMBIENT WATER QUALITY CRITERIA FOR CHROMIUM
Prepared By
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Water Regulations and Standards
Criteria and Standards Division
Washington, D.C.
Office of Research and Development
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
Cincinnati, Ohio
Carcinogen Assessment Group
Washington, D.C.
Environmental Research Laboratories
Corvalis, Oregon
Duluth, Minnesota...
Narragansett, Rhode Island
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Criteria and
Assessment Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved
for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
AVAILABILITY NOTICE
This document is available to the public through the National
Technical Information Service, (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22161.
ii
FOREWORD
Section 304 (a)(1) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (P.L. 95-217),
requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to
publish criteria for water quality accurately reflecting the latest
scientific knowledge on the kind and extent of all identifiable effects
on health and welfare which may be expected from the presence of
pollutants in any body of water, including ground water. Proposed water
quality criteria for the 65 toxic pollutants listed under section 307
(a)(l) of the Clean Water Act were developed and a notice of their
availability was published for public comment on March 15, 1979 (44 FR
15926), July 25, 1979 (44 FR 43660), and October 1, 1979 (44 FR 56628).
This document is a revision of those proposed criteria based upon a
consideration of comments received from other Federal Agencies, State
agencies, special interest groups, and individual scientists. The
criteria contained in this document replace any previously published EPA
criteria for the 65 pollutants. This criterion document is also
published in satisfaction of paragraph 11 of the Settlement Agreement
in Natural Resources Defense Council, et. al. vs. Train, 8 ERC 2120
(D.D.C. 1976), modified, 12 ERC 1833 (D.D.C. 1979).
The term "water quality criteria" is used in two sections of the
Clean Water Act, section 304 (a)(I) and section 303 (c)(2). The term has
a different program impact in each section. In section 304, the term
represents a non-regulatory, scientific assessment of ecological effects.
The criteria presented in this publication are such scientific
assessments. Such water quality criteria associated with specific
stream uses when adopted as State water quality standards under section
303 become enforceable maximum acceptable levels of a pollutant in
ambient waters. The water quality criteria adopted in the State water
quality standards could have the same numerical limits as the criteria
developed under section 304. However, in many situations States may want
to adjust water quality criteria developed under section 304 to reflect
local environmental conditions and human exposure patterns before
incorporation into water quality standards. It is not until their
adoption as part of the State water quality standards that the criteria
become regulatory.
Guidelines to assist the States in the modification of criteria
presented in this document, in the development of water quality
standards, and in other water-related programs of this Agency, are being
developed by EPA.
STEVEN SCHATZOW
Deputy Assistant Administrator
Office of Water Regulations and Standards
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Aquatic Life Toxicology:
Charles E. Stephan, ERL-Duluth John H. Gentile, ERL-Narragansett
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mammalian Toxicology and Human Health Effects:
Ernest Foulkes (author)
University of Cincinnati
Michael L. Dourson (doc. mgr.)
ECAO-Cin
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Bonnie Smith (doc. mgr.) ECAO-Cin
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Christopher T. DeRosa
University of Virginia
Alfred D. Garvin
University of Cincinnati
Charalingayya Hiremath, CAG
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Curt Klaassen
University of Kansas Medical Center
Steven D. Lutkenhoff, ECAO-Cin
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
T.C. Siewicki
National Marine Fisheries Service
Jerry F. Stara, ECAO-Cin
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Anna M. Baetjer
Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene
J. Peter Bercz, HERL-Cin
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Kirk Biddle
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Patrick Durkin
Syracuse Research Corp.
Warren S. Ferguson
Allied Chemical Corp.
Carl L. Giannetta
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Rolf Hartung
University of Michigan
S. Roy Koirtyohann
University of Missouri
Debdas Mukerjee, ECAO-Cin
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Wayne Wolf
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Roy E. Albert, CAG*
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Technical Support Services Staff: D.J. Reisman, M.A. Garlough, B.L. Zwayer,
P.A. Daunt, K.S. Edwards, T.A. Scandura, A.T. Pressley, C.A. Cooper,
M.M. Denessen.
Clerical Staff: C.A. Haynes, S.J. Faehr, L.A. Wade, D. Jones, B.J. Bordicks,
B.J. Quesnell, P. Gray, B. Gardiner, R. Swantack.
*CAG Participating Members: Elizabeth L. Anderson, Larry Anderson, Ralph Arnicar,
Steven Bayard, David L. Bayliss, Chao W. Chen, John R. Fowle III, Bernard Haberman,
Charalingayya Hiremath, Chang S. Lao, Robert McGaughy, Jeffrey Rosenblatt,
Dharm V. Singh, and Todd W. Thorslund.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Criteria Summary
Introduction
Aquatic Life Toxicology
Introduction
Effects
Acute Toxicity
Chronic Toxicity
Plant Effects
Residues
Miscellaneous
Summary
Criteria
References
Mammalian Toxicology and Human Health Effects
Introduction
Exposure
Ingestion from Water and Food
Inhalation
Dermal
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion
Effects
Acute, Subacute, and C
Teratogenicity
Mutagenicity
Carcinogenicity
Criterion Formulation
Chronic Toxicity
Existing Guidelines
and StandardsCurrent Levels of Exposure
Special Groups at Risk
Basis and Derivation of Criterion
References
Appendix
Page
A-1
B-1
B-1
B-3
B-3
B-7
B-9
B-10
B-12
B-13
B-14
B-45
C-1
C-1
C-6
C-6
C-8
C-10
C-11
C-11
C-16
C-16
C-21
C-21
C-23
C-29
C-29
C-29
C-31
C-31
C-37
C-47
V
CRITERIA
CRITERIA DOCUMENT
CHROMIUM
Aquatic Life
For total recoverable hexavalent chromium the criterion to
protect freshwater aquatic life as derived using the Guidelines is
0.29 µg/l as a 24-hour average and the concentration should not
exceed 21 µg/l at any time.
For freshwater aquatic life the concentration (in µg/l) of
total recoverable trivalent chromium should not exceed the numerical
value given by e (1.08[ln(hardness)l+3.48) at any time. For
example, at hardnesses of 50, 100, and 200 mg/l as CaCO3 the concentration
of total recoverable trivalent chromium should not exceed
2,200, 4,700, and 9,900 µg/l, respectively, at any time. The
available data indicate that chronic toxicity to freshwater aquatic
life occurs at concentrations as low as 44 µg/l and would occur at
lower concentrations among species that are more sensitive than
those tested.
For total recoverable hexavalent chromium the
criterion toprotect saltwater aquatic life as derived using the Guidelines is
18 µg/l as a 24-hour average and the concentration should not exceed
1,260 µg/l at any time.
For total recoverable trivalent chromium, the available data
indicate that acute toxicity to saltwater aquatic life occurs at
concentrations as low as 10,300 µg/l, and would occur at lower concentrations
among species that are more sensitive than those tested.
No data are available concerning the chronic toxicity of trivalent
chromium to sensitive saltwater aquatic life.
vi
Human Health
For the protection of human health from the toxic properties
of chromium (III) ingested through water and contaminated aquatic
organisms, the ambient water criterion is determined to be
mg/l.
For the protection of human health from the toxic properties
of chromium (III) ingested through contaminated aquatic organisms
alone, the ambient water criterion is determined to be 1,200 mg/l.
The ambient water quality criterion for chromium (VI) is
recommended to be identical to the existing water standard for
total chromium which is 50 µg/l. Analysis of the toxic effects
data resulted in a calculated level which is protective of human
health against the ingestion of contaminated water and contaminated
aquatic organisms. The calculated value is comparable to the present
standard. For this reason a selective criterion based on exposure
solely from consumption of 6.5 grams of aquatic organisms was
not derived.
vii
INTRODUCTION
Chromium is a metallic element which can exist in several
valence states. However, in the aquatic environment it virtually
is always found in valence states +3 or +6. Hexavalent chromium is
a strong oxidizing agent which reacts readily with reducing agents
such as sulfur dioxide to give trivalent chromium. Cr (III) oxidizes
slowly to Cr (VI), the rate increasing with temperature.
Oxidation progresses rapidly when Cr (III) adsorbs to MnO, but is
interfered with by Ca (II) and Mg (II) ions. Thus, accumulation
would probably occur in sediments where chemical equilibria favor
the formation of Cr (III), while Cr (VI), if favored, would presumably
dissipate in soluble forms. Hexavalent chromium exists in
solution as a component of an anion, rather than a cation, and
therefore, does not precipitate from alkaline solution. The three
important anions are: hydrochromate, chromate, and dichromate.
The proportion of hexavalent chromium present in each of these
forms depends on pH. In strongly basic and neutral solutions the
chromate form predominates. As pH is lowered, the hydrochromate
concentration increases. At very low pH the dichromate species
predominates. In the pH ranges encountered in natural waters the
proportion of dichromate ions is relatively low. In the acid portion
of the environmental range, the predominant form is hydrochromate
ion (63.6 percent at pH 6.0 to 6.2) (Trama and Benoit, 1960).
In the alkaline portion of the range, the predominant form is chromate
ion (95.7 percent at pH 8.5 to 7.8) (Trama and Benoit, 1960).
A-l
Trivalent chromium in solution forms numerous types of hexacoordinate
complexes (Cotton and Wilkinson, 1962). The best known
and one of the most stable of these is the amine class (complexes
include aquo- ions, acido- complexes (which are anionic), and polynuclear
complexes. Complex formation can prevent precipitation of
the hydrous oxide or other insoluble forms at pH values at which it
would otherwise occur.
Chromium salts are used extensively in the metal finishing
industry as electroplating,* cleaning agents, and as mordants in the
textile industry. They also are used in cooling waters, in the
leather tanning industry, in catalytic manufacture, in pigments and
primer paints, and in fungicides and wood preservatives. Kopp
(1969) reported a mean surface water concentration in the United
States of 9.7 µg/l, based on 1,577 samples. Trivalent chromium is
recognized as a essential trace element for humans. Hexavalent
chromium in the workplace is suspected of being carcinogenic.
A-2
REFERENCES
Cotton, F.A. and G. Wilkinson. 1962. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry.
Interscience Publishers, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
Kopp, J.F. 1969. The Occurrence of Trace Elements in Water. In: -
D. Hemphill (ea.), Trace Substances in Environmental Health III.
University of Missouri, Columbia. p. 59.
Trama, F.B. and R.J. Benoit. 1960. Toxicity of hexavalent chromium
to bluegills. Jour. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 32: 868.
A-3
Aquatic Life Toxicology*
INTRODUCTION
Chromium is a chemically complex metal which occurs in valence states
ranging from -2 to +6. The hexavalent and trivalent chromium compounds are
the biologically and environmentally significant forms of the element, but
they have very different chemical characteristics. Hexavalent chromium is
very soluble in natural water. Although it is a strong oxidizing agent in
acidic solutions, hexavalent chromium is relatively stable in most natural
waters. Trivalent chromium tends to form stable complexes with negatively
charged organic or inorganic species and thus its solubility and toxicity
vary with water quality characteristics such as hardness and alkalinity.
Most of the trivalent chromium species are either cationic or neutral and
the hexavalent species are anionic.
Information on the toxic effects of chromium on freshwater organisms is
relatively extensive, but the data base for hexavalent chromium is greater
than that for trivalent chromium. The data indicate that water hardness has
an insignificant influence on the toxicity of hexavalent chromium in fresh
water; thus, it is not necessary to develop a criterion as a function of
water quality. On the other hand, the freshwater data indicate that water
hardness has a significant influence on the acute toxicity of trivalent
chromium.
Most of the saltwater acute and chronic toxicity data are for hexavalent
chromium. Only a few studies have been conducted on the effects of triva
*The reader is referred to the Guidelines for Deriving Water Quality Criteria
for the Protection of Aquatic Life and Its Uses in order to better understand
the following discussion and recommendation. The following tables
contain the appropriate data that were found in the literature, and at the
bottom of each table are calculations for deriving various measures of toxicity
as described in the Guidelines.
B-l
lent chromium on saltwater organisms, probably because of the low solubility
of trivalent chromium in saltwater. The kinetics of precipitation of trivalent
chromium in saltwater systems are complex but regardless of its form,
trivalent chromium may still be ingested and bioconcentrated by filter or
deposit feeding bivalve mollusc and polychaete species.
Of the analytical measurements currently available, water quality criteria
for trivalent chromium and for hexavalent chromium are probably best
stated in terms of total recoverable trivalent chromium and total recoverable
hexavalent chromium, respectively, because of the variety of forms of
chromium that can exist in bodies of water and the various chemical and toxicological
properties of these forms. The forms of chromium that are commonly
found in bodies of water and are not measured by the total recoverable
procedure, such as the chromium that is a part of minerals, clays, and sand,
probably are forms that are less toxic to aquatic life and probably will not
be converted to the more toxic forms very readily under natural conditions.
On the other hand, forms of chromium that are commonly found in bodies of
water and are measured by the total recoverable procedure, such as the free
ion, and the hydroxide, carbonate, and sulfate salts, probably are forms
that are more toxic to aquatic life or can be converted to the more toxic
forms under natural conditions. Because the criterion is derived on the
basis of tests conducted on soluble inorganic salts of chromium, total chromium
and total recoverable chromium concentrations in the tests will probably
be about the same and a variety of analytical procedures will produce
about the same results. Except as noted, all concentrations reported herein
are expected to be essentially equivalent to total recoverable trivalent or
hexavalent chromium concentrations. All concentrations are expressed as
chromium, not as the compound.
B-2
EFFECTS
Acute Toxicity
Hexavalent Chromium
As shown in Table 1, the freshwater data base available for hexavalent
chromium has numerous acute values for thirteen species from ten different
families. Acute values have been reported for six freshwater invertebrate
species from five families. These acute values range from 67 11g/1
for a scud to 59,900 ug/l for a midge. The scud Gammarus pseudolimnaeus was
by far the most sensitive species tested with an LC50 value about onefiftieth
of the next lower acute value. Invertebrate species are generally
more sensitive to hexavalent chromium than fish species. As shown in Table
3, the species mean acute values for five of the six invertebrate species
are less than that of any fish species. The rotifer Philodina roseola was
about three times as sensitive to chromium at 35°C as at 5'C (Schaffer and
Pipes, 1973).
Table I also lists acute values for seven freshwater fish species,
of which more than 70 percent of the values are for the goldfish and fathead
minnow. The 96-hour LC5G Values range from 17,600 pg/l for the fathead
minnow to 249,000 vg/l for the goldfish. Static tests with unmeasured concentrations
and flow-through tests with measured concentrations gave similar
results (Pickering,
1980).Wallen, et al. (1957) studied the toxicity of hexavalent chromium
to mosquitofish in turbid water using potassium and sodium salts of both dichromate
and chromate (Table 6). Based on chromium, both dichromate salts
were more toxic than the chromate salts. The geometric means of the two
values were 95,000 pg/l and 120,000 pg/l for the dichromate and chromate,
respectively. Trama and Benoit (1960) studied the toxicity of chromium to
B-3
the bluegill using potassium dichromate and potassium chromate. The 96-hour
LC50 values were
110,000 ug/l for the dichromate salt and 170,000 pg/l forthe chromate salt. They attributed the lower LC50 value of the dichromate
salt
to its greater acidity, because chromium is slightly more toxic atlower pH values.
The toxicity of hexavalent chromium to the bluegill in soft and
hard water was tested at 18°C and 3O'C (Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia,
1960). At 18'C the 96-hour LCso values were 113,000 pg/l in
soft water and 135,000 pg/l in hard water. Similar results were obtained at
3O'C with the 96-hour LC50 values being 113,000 pg/l in soft water and
130,000 ,,g/l in hard water.
Pickering and Henderson
(1966) tested the toxicity of potassium dichromateto the fathead minnow and bluegill in soft and hard water. The
96-hour LC50 values for the fathead minnow in soft and hard water were
17,600 and 27,300 ug/l, respectively. The corresponding values for the
bluegill were 118,000 pg/l and 133,000 ug/l.
The data from Adelman and Smith (1976) shown in Tables 1 and 6 indicate
that the threshold lethal concentration for hexavalent chromium does
not occur within 96 hours. They found that for 16 tests, the average ratio
of
11-day to 96-hour values was 0.37 for the fathead minnow and 0.27 for thegoldfish.
The Freshwater Final Acute Value for hexavalent chromium, derived
from the species mean acute values listed in Table 3 using the calculation
procedures described in the Guidelines, is 21.2 vg/l.
Acute toxicity data for hexavalent chromium and twenty saltwater
fish and invertebrate species have been reported (Table 1). Acute toxicity
values ranged from 2,000 ug/l for a polychaete worm and mysid shrimp to
B-4
105,000 ,,g/l for the mud snail. The LC50 values for fish species range
from 12,400 vg/l for the Atlantic silverside to 91,000 vg/l for the murmichog.
The most sensitive species were the polychaete annelids (2,000-8,000
ug/l), the mysid shrimp (2,000-4,400 pg/l), and two copepods (3,650 and
6,600 pg/l). The LC50 values for hexavalent chromium and bivalve molluscs
range from 57,000 ug/l for the soft shell clam to 14,000 pg/l for the brackish
water clam. The sensitivity of the latter was salinity dependent with
acute toxicity values of 35,000 pg/l and 14,000 pg/l at salinities of 22
g/kg and 5.5 g/kg, respectively. Adult starfish were insensitive with an
LC5o value of 32,000 pg/l. A Saltwater Final Acute Value of 1,260 ug/l
was obtained for hexavalent chromium using the species mean acute values in
Table 3 and the calculation procedures described in the Guidelines.
Trivalent Chromium
As shown in Table 1, the data base for acute toxicity of trivalent
chromium to freshwater organisms includes 28 values for 19 animal species
from 14 different families. Although the total number of values is smaller,
more species have been tested with trivalent chromium than with hexavalent
chromium.
Thirteen acute values for trivalent chromium have been reported for
eight invertebrate species (Table 1). These values range from 2,000 ug/l
for Daphnia magna and the mayfly to 64,000 pg/l for the caddisfly, all three
of which were determined in soft water. Chapman, et al. (Manuscript) studied
the effects of three levels of water hardness on the toxicity of trivalent
chromium to Oaphnia magna. They reported 48-hour acute values that
ranged from 16,800 pg/l in soft water to 58,700 ug/l in hard water.
Table 1 also includes data for the acute toxicity of trivalent
chromium to freshwater fish species. Fifteen 96-hour LC50 values have
B-5
been reported for 11 fish species from eight families. These values ranged
from 3,330 ,,g/l for the guppy in soft water to 71,900 pg/l for the bluegill
in hard water. There are comparative data on the influence of water hardness
on toxicity for the fathead minnow and the bluegill. The 96-hour
LC50 values for the fathead minnow tested in soft and hard water are 5,070
and 67,400 ug/l, respectively. The corresponding values for the bluegill
are 7,460 and 71,900 pgll.
The comparative data from Pickering and Henderson (1966) indicate
that in soft water trivalent was more toxic than hexavalent chromium to four
fish species. In hard water trivalent chromium was less toxic to the fathead
minnow and more toxic to the bluegill than hexavalent chromium.
An exponential equation was used to describe the observed relationship
of the acute toxicity of trivalent chromium to hardness in fresh water.
A least square regression of the natural logarithms of the acute values on
the natural logarithms of hardness produced slopes of 1.64, 0.83, and 0.78,
respectively, for Daphnia magna, fathead minnow, and bluegill (Table 1).
The first two slopes were significant, but the last could not be tested because
only two values were available. The arithmetic mean slope (1.08) was
used with the geometric mean toxicity value and hardness for each species to
obtain a logarithmic intercept for each of the nineteen freshwater species
for which acute values are available for trivalent chromium. The species
mean acute intercept, calculated as the exponential of the logarithmic intercept,
was used to compare the relative acute sensitivities (Table 3).
Both the most sensitive and the least sensitive species are invertebrates.
A freshwater final acute intercept of 32.3 pg/l was obtained for trivalent
B-6
chromium using the species mean acute intercepts listed in Table 3 and the
calculation procedures described in the Guidelines. Thus, the Final Acute
Equation is e (1.08[ln(hardness)]+3.48).
The few data that are available on the toxicity of trivalent chromium
to saltwater species (Table 1) indicate that, probably because of precipitation,
a large amount of trivalent chromium must be added to saltwater
to kill aquatic organisms.
Chronic Toxicity
Hexavalent Chromium
The chronic data base for hexavalent chromium and freshwater species
(Table 2) contains data for three fish species. Benoit (1976) studied
the effects of hexavalent chromium in the chronic tests with brook trout and
rainbow trout. The limits of 200 and 350 ug/l, with a chronic value of 265
ugil, were established on the basis of survival for both species. Growth in
weight during the first eight months was retarded at all test concentrations.
However, this was a temporary effect on growth and was not used to
establish the chronic limits.
Sauter, et al. (1976) also used the rainbow trout in a chronic
study. The limits for this early life stage exposure were 51 and 105 ,,g/l
with a chronic value Of 73 pg/l. These values were established on the basis
of a reduction of growth after 60 days post-hatch exposure. This chronic
value of 73 ug/l was about one-fourth of the chronic value of 265 vg/l from
the chronic test reported by 8enoit (1976).
The acute-chronic ratios for brook trout and rainbow trout, calculated
from the data of BenOft (1976) are 220 and 260, respectively (Table
a.
Sauter, et al. (1976) provided no acute data in their study with whichto ca?cu?ate acute-chronic ratios.
B-7
The limits of 1,000 and 3,950 ug/l in a life-cycle test with the
fathead minnow (Pickering, 1980) were based on survival. In this exposure
also an early retardation of growth was only temporary. The chronic value
of 1,990 lrg/l is much higher than that for the trout but the acute-chronic
ratio of 19 is much lower.
No chronic values are available for hexavalent chromium with any
freshwater invertebrate species.
Results of life-cycle studies with the saltwater polychaete, Neanthes
arenaceodentata, and the mysid shrimp Mysidopsis bahia are reported in
Table 2. Other life cycle data on the polychaetes, Capitella capitata and
Ophryotrocha*diadema, (Table 6) were not included here because exposure concentrations
were not adequately defined. Hexavalent chromium was chronically
toxic to the polychaete at 25 ug/l and to the mysid at 132 pg/l and both
of these species were among the most acutely saensitive to hexavalent chromium
(Table 1). The acute-chronic ratios were 120 for the polychaete and 15
for the mysid. These ratios, while quite different, are consistent with
those for freshwater fish species.
The geometric mean of the five acute-chronic ratios for three
freshwater fish species and two saltwater invertebrate species is 72. The
Freshwater Final Acute Value of 21.2 ug/l divided by the acute-chronic ratio
of 72 results in a Freshwater Final Chronic Value for hexavalent chromium of
0.29 ug/l. Similarly, the Saltwater Final Chronic Value for hexavalent
chromium is 17.5 ug/l.
Trivalent Chromium
The freshwater chronic data base for trivalent chromium (Table 2)
contains data for a life-cycle test with Daphnia magna in soft water and a
life-cycle test with the fathead minnow in hard water. In hard water the
B-8
chronic value of 1,020 ug/l for the fathead minnow is greater than the
chronic value of 66 ugll for Daphnia magna. Trivalent chromium appeared to
be more toxic to Daphnia magna in hard water than in soft water. The
chronic value in soft water was 66 ug/l (Table 2), but in hard water the
lowest tested concentration (44 11911) inhibited reproduction (Table 6).
Chapman, et al , (Manuscript) speculated that ingested precipitated chromium
contributed to the toxicity in hard water. Biesinger and Christensen (1972)
also conducted a life-cycle test with Daphnia magna but the test concentrations
were not measured; the data are included in Table 6. The
acutechronicratio is 27 for the fish and 250 for Daphnia magna.
No data on the chronic effects of trivalent chromium on saltwater
species are available.
Plant Effects
Hexavalent Chromium
The data for four species of freshwater algae and Eurasian watermilfoil
(Table 4) indicate that algae are sensitive to hexavalent chromium.
The effect concentrations of chromium range from 10 vg/l for reduction in
growth of a green alga to 1,900 ug/l for root weight inhibition of Eurasian
watermilfoil. Growth of the green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardi, was reduced
at a concentration of 10 ug/l in BOLD's basal medium.
Toxicity of hexavalent chromium to the diatom, Navicula seminulum,
was tested at three temperatures in both soft and hard waters (Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1960). The geometric mean of the concentrations
causing a 50 percent reduction in growth was 245 ug/l in soft
waters and 335 pg/l in hard water. The diatom was more sensitive to chromium
at 22'C than at 30°C.
B-9
The
data indicate that green algae are quite sensitive to hexavalentchromium. However, chromium concentrations were not measured in any of
the exposures listed in Table 4, so a Freshwater Final Plant Value is not
available for hexavalent chromium.
Toxicity studies were performed with the saltwater macroalga, Macrocystis
pyrifera, to investigate the effect of hexavalent chromium on photosynthesis
(Table 4). The 96-hour EC50 reported by Clendenning and North
(1959) was
5,000 ug/l, whereas 20 percent inhibition was noted after fivedays at 1,000 ug/l (Bernhard and Zattera, 1975).
the plants were among the most sensitive species
cause no chromium concentrations were measured,
Value can be stated.
Trivalent Chromium
These data indicate that
to chromium. Again, beno
Saltwater Final Plant
Toxicity data are available for only one freshwater plant species
(Table 4). Root weight was inhibited at a trivalent chromium concentration
of 9,900
ug/l (Stanley, 1974). Exposure concentrations were not measured,so a Freshwater Final Plant Value for trivalent chromium is not available.
No saltwater plant species have been tested with trivalent chromium.
Residues
Hexavalent Chromium
Data are available from two studies with the rainbow trout and hexavalent
chromium, and the bioconcentration factor is about one (Table 5).
Data on bioconcentration of hexavalent chromium and saltwater species is
limited to one polychaete species and the oyster and blue mussel (Table 4).
The bioconcentration factors are in the range of 125 to 200.
B-10
Trivalent Chromium
Data are not available concerning the bioconcentration of trivalent
chromium by freshwater organisms.
Uptake of trivalent chromium by the blue mussel, soft shell clam,
and oyster has been studied and the bioconcentration factors range from 86
to 153 (Table 5). These results are similar to those for hexavalent
chromium.
Miscellaneous
Hexavalent Chromium
Table 6 includes data for other effects on freshwater species that
were not included in the first five tables. The data base for hexavalent
chromium is more extensive than that for trivalent chromium.
The data in this table indicate that Daphnia magna is a very sensitive
species. Debalka (1975) reported 72-hour EC5D values that ranged
from 31 to 81 ugil. In addition, Trabalka and Gehrs (1977) studied the
chronic toxicity of hexavalent chromium to Daphnia magna. They found a significant
effect on both life span and fecundity at all test concentrations
including the lowest of
10 pg/l. Because a lower limit was not obtained,this datum is included in Table 6 instead of Table 2. This value certainly
supports the Final Chronic Value.
Algae also appear to be sensitive to chromium. Zarafonetis and
Hampton (1974) reported inhibition of photosynthesis of a natural population
of river algae exposed to
20 11911.Data in Table 6 also indicate that low concentrations of hexavalent
chromium have a deleterious effect on the growth of fishes. Olson and
Foster (1956) reported a statistically significant effect on growth of chinook
salmon at 16 pg/l and on rainbow trout at 21 ,,g/l. At these concentra-
B-11
tions, growth in weight was reduced about ten percent. As noted earlier,
Benoit (1976) and Pickering (1980) also reported effects on growth of fishes
exposed to low concentrations. However, in these life-cycle tests the effect
was temporary and was not used to establish chronic limits.
Chronic mortality of the saltwater polychaete, Neanthes arenaceodentata,
resulted in 59-day EC50 value for hexavalent chromium of 200 ug/l
compared to the 96-hour LC50 of 3,100 ug/l and the chronic value of 25
ugil l
Sublethal effects reported for this species show inhibition of tubebuilding at 79 ug/l.
Holland, et al. (1960) reported toxicity to silver salmon at a concentration
of 31,800 ug/l which is similar to the species mean acute
values(Table 1) reported for the speckled sanddab (30,500) but twice as high as
that reported for the Atlantic silverside
(15,000).The effect of salinity and temperature on hexavalent chromium toxicity
to grass shrimp is reported by Fales (1978). At fixed salinities of
10and 20 g/kg toxicity increased with increasing temperature between 10 to
25’c.
At fixed temperatures toxicity decreased with increasing salinityfrom
10 to 20 g/kg.Trivalent Chromium
Embryos of a freshwater snail are rather insensitive to trivalent
chromium (Table 6).
Mearns, et al. (1976) were able to kill a saltwater polychaete worm
with trivalent chromium by adding 50,400 ug/l, probably because the pH
dropped to 4.5 due to the extensive precipitation. When the pH was raised
to about 7.9 by adding sodium hydroxide, the worms not only survived for at
least 160 days, but also reproduced (Table 6).
B-12
Summary
Hexavalent Chromium
Acute data for hexavalent chromium are available for thirteen
freshwater animal species from ten different families which include a wide
variety of animals that perform a spectrum of ecological functions. Data
indicate that water hardness has an insignificant influence on toxicity.
Most invertebrate species are more sensitive than most fish, and a scud is
the most acutely sensitive species.
Long-term tests with brook trout and rainbow trout both gave
chronic values of 265 ugil which are much lower than the chronic value of
1,990 ug/l for the fathead minnow. No chronic values are available for
freshwater invertebrate species.
The data for freshwater plants indicate that green algae are sensitive
to hexavalent chromium and the bioconcentration factor for rainbow
trout is about one.
Other data reveal more sensitive effects. The growth of chinook
salmon was reduced at a measured concentration of 16 ug/l. In chronic tests
with brook trout, rainbow trout, and fathead minnows a temporary adverse
affect on growth occurred at low concentrations. In a life-cycle test with
Daphnia magna the lowest test concentration of 10 ug/l reduced life span and
fecundity.
The acute toxicity of hexavalent chromium to twenty saltwater vertebrate
and invertebrate species ranges from 2,000 ug/l for polychaete annelids
and a mysid shrimp, to 105,000 ug/l for the mud snail. Polychaetes
and microcrustaceans are the most acutely sensitive taxa. The chronic
values for polychaetes and a mysid shrimp are 25 and 132 ug/l, respectively,
and the acute-chronic ratios are 120 and 15, respectively. Toxicity to
macroalgae was reported at 1,000 and 5,000 ug/l.
8-13
Data for bioconcentration factors for hexavalent chromium range
from 125 to 200 for bivalves and polychaetes.
Trivalent Chromium
Acute data for trivalent chromium are available for 19 freshwater
animal species from 14 different families. The data indicate that water
hardness has a significant influence on toxicity, with trivalent chromium
being more toxic in soft water. In soft water the sensitivity of fish and
invertebrate species is comparable.
One life-cycle test with Daphnia magna in soft water gave a chronic
value of 66 ugil, but another gave a chronic value of 445 ug/l. In a
chronic test in hard water the lowest test concentration of 44 ug/l inhibited
reproduction of Daphnia magna, but this effect may have been due to
ingested precipitated chromium. In a life-cycle test with the fathead
minnow in hard water the chronic value was 1,020 ugll. Toxicity data are
available for only one freshwater plant species. A concentraton of 9,900
ug/l inhibited growth of roots of Eurasian watermilfoil. No bioconcentration
factors are available for trivalent chromium and freshwater organisms.
The available acute values for trivalent chromium in saltwater are
both above 10,000 11911, probably because trivalent chromium has a low solubility
in saltwater. Bioconcentration factors for saltwater organisms and
trivalent chromium range from 86 to 153. This is similar to the bioconcentration
factors for hexavalent chromium and saltwater species.
CRITERIA
For total recoverable hexavalent chromium the criterion to protect
freshwater aquatic life as derived using the Guidelines is 0.29 pg/l as a
24-hour average and the concentration should not exceed 21 ug/l at any time.
B-14
For freshwater aauatic life the concentration (in pg/l) of total recoverable
trivalent chromium should not exceed the numerical value given by
e(1*a8[1n(hardness)l+3048) at any time. For example, at hardnesses of 50,
100, and 200 mg/l as CaC03 the concentration of total recoverable trivalent
chromium should not exceed 2,200, 4,700, and 9,900 ug/l, respectively,
at any time. The available data indicate that chronic toxicity to freshwater
aquatic life occurs at concentrations as low as 44 ug/l and would
occur at lower concentrations among species that are more sensitive than
those tested.
For total recoverable hexavalent chromium the criterion to protect saltwater
aquatic life as derived using the Guidelines is 18 ug/l as a 24-hour
average and the concentration should not exceed 1,260 pg/l at any time.
For total recoverable trivalent chromium, the available data indicate
that acute toxicity to saltwater aquatic life occurs at concentrations as
10~
as 10,300 ugil, and would occur at lower concentrations among speciesthat are more sensitive than those tested. No data are available concerning
the chronic toxicity of trivalent chromium to sensitive saltwater aquatic
life.
B-15
I
v;
5
L
(0 rC
ii,
CO --
+-
BP’
!!I cl
5:
2% OL +C
OV
Qw
I I I I I I
v)
_I w
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I
1 I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0
I
u;
I
v;
I 3
9 9
VJ *
ml -I
I I I I I
8
0
m 8
O-
9
x
E
I
II
I
0’
.2
II
L
%
.
‘;;
l
t
I
c
Y Y
W w s s Yr-
N
0
-I
0
t
2
s
%
9
Q 9
w
I I I
0
I 82, I I I
8
Table 3. (Continued)
Rank*
2
I
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
IO
9
8
Spacles
Rotlfer,
Philodina acuticornis
Speclas Mean
Acute Va I ue
(pq/1)
3,100
Spaclas Mean
Acute-clwon I c
Ratio
Scud,
Gammarus pseudolinmaeus
61
SALTWATER SPECIES
Mud snail,
Nassar lus obsoletus
Blue crab,
Calllnectes sapfdus
Mummlchog,
Fundulus heteroclltus
Soft she1 I clam,
& arenar la
Starf Ish,
Asterlas forbesi
Speck led sanddab,
Citharichthys stigmaeus
Brackish water clam,
cuneata Rangia
Copepod,
Tlgrlopus japonicus
Atlantic silverside,
Menidla menidia --
Her-ml t crab,
Pagurus longicarpus
Polychaete worm,
Ophryotrocha diadema
Cow@,
Acartla clausi --
to5,ooo
93,000
91,000
57,000
32,000
30,500
22,000
17,200
15,000
10,000
7,500
6,600
B-30
Table 3. (Continued)
Rank’
7
Species
Polychaete worm,
Capitella capltata
6 Mysid shrimp,
Mysidopsis biqeloui
5
PO I ychaete worm,Ctenodrilus serratus
4 CoPePod,
Pseudodiaptomus coranatus
3 PO I ychaete worm,
Neanthes arenaceodentata
2 Mysid shrinp,
Wysidopsis bahia
1 Polychaete worm,
Nereis vlrens --
Species Mean Species Meen
Acute Value Acut~hronlc
QlQ/i) Ratio
6,300
4,400
4,300
3,650
3,100
2,@33
2,000
Rank* Species
Species Mean
Acute I nteccept
(W/i)
Trivalent Chrcunium
FRESHWATER SPECIES
I8 Caddlsf ly,
Hydropsyche betten I
1,075
17 Caddlsf ly,
Unidentified
728
16 Oamself ly,
Unidentified
633
15 Str 1 ped bass,
Morone saxatilis
233
120
I5
Species Mean
Acute-Chrcmlc
Ratlo
B-31
Table 3. Kant inued)
RankB
14
I3
I2
11
IO
9
8
7
6
Species
Pumpkinseed,
J’bbOSUS LepOtIIlS
American eel,
Anguiiia rostrata
Randed klilifish,
Fundulus dlaphanus
Bluegl I I,
Lepomis macrochirus
Wh I te perch,
Morone amaricana
Carp,
Cyprinus carp10
Goldfish,
Carrasius auratus
Ciadoceran,
Daphnia magna
Annei id,
Nais sp.
CrJPPV,
Poeciila retlcuiata
Snal I,
Amnicoia sp.
Fathead minnow,
Pimephales pfomeias
Scud,
Gammarus sp.
224
224
224
I91
191
189
I61
I38
136
132
I23
118
47
Species Mean
ACUh-ClUOniC
Ratio
B-32
Table 3. (Continued)
Species Mean species HemI
Acute intercept Acute-Chronic
Rank* species erg/i 1 Ratio
I hYf IY, 33.4
Ephemerela subvaria
l
Ranked fran least sensitive to most sensitive based on specfes meanacute value or intercept.
Hexava lent Chromium
Freshwater Flnai Acute Value = 21.2 Rg/l
Saltwater Final Acute Value = 1,260 ug/i
Final AcuteChronic Ratio = 72 (see text)
Freshwater Ffnal Chronic Value = 121.2 ug/ff/72 = 0.29 ug/f
Saltwater Final Chronic Value = (1,260 ug/ff/72 = 17.5 ug/i
Trivalent Chromium - Freshwater
Finaf Acute Intercept = 32.3 ug/i
Natural logarithm of 32.3 = 3.48
Acute slope = I.08 (see Table if
Final
Acute Equation = e (I.061 In(hardnessf ft3.48)B-33
I
3
;.
.
a
t
ff
m
4
4
i
f
0f
W
m
A
&d I
m
6 E z % L - c c
xm
.
8 t-
ii 4 Q 3 -K- Is:
I I I
I I I
I I I I I I
.
n,
f t
REFERENCES
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1960. The sensitivity of
aquatic life to certain chemicals commonly found in industrial wastes.
Final Report: U.S. PHS Grant RG-3965 (CZRl).
Adelman, I.R. and L.L. Smith. 1976. Standard test fish development.
Part 1. Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and goldfish (Carrassius auratus)
as standard fish in bioassays and their reaction to potential reference
toxicants. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, EPA 600/3-76-061a, Duluth, Minnesota.
Anderson, B.G. 1948. The apparent thresholds of toxicity to Daphnia magna
for chlorides of various metals when added to Lake Erie water. Trans. Am.
Fish. Sot. 78: 96.
Benoit, D.A. 1976. Chronic effects of hexavalent chromium on brook trout
(Salvelinus fontinalis) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Water Res.
10: 497.
Bernhard, M. and A. Zattera. 1975. Major Pollutants in the Marine Environment.
In: Marine Pollution and Marine Waste Disposal. Pergamon Press, New -
York. p. 195.
Biesinger, K.E. and G.M. Christensen.
1972. Effects of various metals onsurvival, growth, reproduction, and metabolism of Daphnia magna. Jour.
Fish. Res. Board Can. 29:
1691.B-45
Bills, T.D., et al. 1977. Effects of residues of the polychlorinated biphenyl
Aroclor 1254 on the sensitivity of rainbow trout to selected environmental
contaminants. Prog. Fish. Cult. 39: 150.
Birge, W.J., et al. 1978. Embryo-larval Bioassays on Inorganic Coal Elements
and in situ Biomonitoring of Coal-waste Effluents. In: Proc. of a -- -
Symposium. Surface Mining and Fish/Wildlife Needs in the Eastern United
States. FWSIOBS-78-81. p. 97.
Broderius, S.J. and L.L. Smith.
1979. Lethal and sublethal effects ofbinary mixtrues of cyanide and hexavalent chromium, zinc, or ammonia to the
fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) and rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri).
Jour. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36: 164.
Buhler, D.R., et al. 1977. Tissue accumulation and enzymatic effects of
hexavalent chromium in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Jour. Fish Res.
Board Can. 34: 9.
Buikema, A.L.,
Jr., et al. 1974. Evaluation of Philodina acuticornis(Rotifera) as a bioassay organisms for heavy metals. Water Resour. Bul.,
Am. Water Res. Assoc. 10: 648.
Cairns,
J., Jr., et al. 1976. Invertebrate response to thermal shock followingexposure to acutely sublethal concentrations of chemicals. Arch.
Hydrobiol. 77: 164.
B-46
Calabrese, A., et al. 1973. The toxicity of heavy metals to embryos of the
American oyster Crassostrea virginica. Marine Biol. 18: 162.
Capauzzo, J.M. and
5.3. Sasner. 1977. The Effect of Chromium on FiltrationRates and Metabolic Activity of Mytilus edulis L. and Mya arenaria L. In: -
Physiological Responses of Marine Biota to Pollutants. Academic Press, New
York. p. 225.
Chapman, G.A., et al. Effects of water hardness on the toxicity of metals
to Daphnia magna. Status Report, January 1980. (Manuscript)
Clendenning, K.A. and
W.J. North. 1959. Effects of Waste on the GiantKelp, Macrocystis pyrifera. a: Proc. 1st Conf. Waste Disposal Marine Environ.,
Berkeley, California. 82.
Debelak, R.W.
1975. Acute toxicity of mixtures of copper, chromium, andcadmium to Daphnia magna. Thesis, Miami Univ., Oxford, Ohio.
Dowden, B.F. and H.J. Bennett.
1965. Toxicity of selected chemicals tocertain animals. Jour. Water Pollut. Con. Fed. 37: 1308.
Eisler, R. and
R.J. Hennekey. 1977. Acute toxicities of Cd'+, Cr+6,Hg
+2 , Ni+', and Zn +2 to estuarine macrofauna. Arch. Environ. Contam.Toxicol. 6: 315.
Ellgaard, E.G., et al.
1978. Locomotor activity of the bluegill Lepomismacrochirus: Hyperactivity induced by sublethal concentrations of cadmium,
chromium, and zinc. Jour. Fish Biol. 1: 19.
B-47
Fales, R.R. 1978. The influence of temperature and salinity on the toxicity
of hexavalent chromium to the grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio (Holthius).
Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 20: 447.
Frank, P.M. and P.B. Robertson. 1979.
ity of cadmium and chromium to the b
Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 21(1-Z): 74.
The influence of sa 1 inity on toxiclue
crab, Callinectes Bull. sapidus.
Freeman, L. and
I. Fowler. 1953. Toxicity of combinations of certain inorganiccompounds to Daphnia magna Straus. Sewage Ind. Wastes.
25: 1191.Fromm, P.O. and R.H. Schiffman. 1958. Toxic action of hexavalent chromium
on largemouth bass. Jour. Wildl. Manage. 22: 40.
Fromm, P.O. and R.M. Stokes.
1962. Assimilation and metabolism of chromiumby trout. Jour. Water Pollut. Con. Fed. 34: 1151.
Garton, R.R.
1972. Biological effect of cooling tower blowdown. 71stNatl. Meet. Am
Inst. Chem. Eng. Jour., Dallas, Texas.Hale,
J.G. 1977. Toxicity of metal mining wastes. Bull. Environ. Contam.Toxicol. 17: 66.
Hill, C.W. and P.O. From. 1968. Response of the interrenal gland of rainbow
trout (Salmo gairdneri) to stress. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.
11: 69.Holland, G.A., et al. 1960. Toxic effects of organic and inorganic pollutants
on young salmon and trout. Wash. Dept. Fish. Res. Bull. 5.
B-48
Hughes,
J.S. 1971. Tolerance of striped bass, Morone saxatilis (Walbaum),larvae and fingerlings to nine chemicals used in pond culture. Proc. 24th
Annu. Conf., Southeastern Assoc. Game Fish Comm., 1970. p. 431.
Kuhnert, P.M., et al. 1976. The effect of in vivo chromium exposure on --
Na/K- and Mg-ATPase activity in several tissues of the rainbow trout (Salmo
gairdneri). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 15: 383.
Lee, D.R. and A.L. Buikema,
Jr. 1979. Molt-related sensitivity of Daphniapulex
in toxicity testing. Jour. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36: 1129.Mearns, A.J. and D.R. Young. 1977. Chromium in the Southern California
Marine Environment. In: C.S. Giam (ed.), Pollutant Effects on Marine Organisms.
D.C. Heath and Co., Lexington, Massachusetts. p. 125.
Mearns,
A.J., et al. 1976. Chromium effects on coastal organisms. Jour.Water Pollut. Con. Fed. 48:
1929.01 ubo, K. and T. Okubo.
1962. Study on the bioassay method for the evaluationof water pollution.
II. Use of the fertilized eggs of sea urchins andbivalves. Bull. Tokaj. Regional Fish. Res. Lab. 32: 131.
Olson, K.R. and R.C. Harrel.
1973. Effect of salinity on acute toxicity ofmercury copper, and chromium for Rangia cuneata (Pelecypoda, Mactridae).
Contrib. Mar. Sci. 17: 9.
O?sGn, ?.A.
1958. Comparative toxicity of Cr(V1) and Cr(II1) in salmon.Hanford Biol. Res. Annu. Rep. for 1957. HW-53500: 215.
B-49
Olson, P.A. and R.F. Foster. 1956. Effect of chronic exposure to sodium
dichromate on young chinook salmon and rainbow trout. Hanford Biol. Res.
Annu. Rep. for 1955. HW-41500: 35.
Oshida, P.S. 1978. A safe level of hexavalent chromium for a marine polychaete.
S. Calif. Coastal Water Res. Proj., El Segundo, Caifornia. Ann.
Rep. p. 169.
Oshida, P.S. and D.J. Reish. 1975. Effects of chromium on reproduction in
polychaetes. S. Calif. Coastal Water Res. Proj., El Segundo, California.
Ann. Rep. 55.
Oshida, P.S. and J.L. Wright. 1978. Effects of hexavalent chromium on sea
urchin embryo and brittle stars. S. Calif. Coastal Water Res. Proj., El
Segundo, California. Ann. Rep. 181.
Oshida, P.S., et al. 1976. The effects of hexavalent and trivalent chromium
on Neanthes arenaceodentata (Polychaeta: Annelida). S. Calif. Coastal
Water Res. Proj., El Segundo, California. TM225: 58.
Patrick, R., et al. 1975. The role of trace elements in management of
nuisance growth. EPA 660/Z-75-008. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Corvallis,
Oregon.
Pickering, O.H. 1980. Chronic toxicity of hexavalent chromium to the fathead
minnow (Pimephales promelas). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 9: 405.
B-50
Pickering, Q.H. Chronic toxicity of trivalent chromium to the fathead minnow,
(Pimephales promelas) in hard water. (Manuscript)
Pickering, Q.H. and C. Henderson.
1966. The acute toxicity of some heavymetals to different species of warm water fishes. Air Water Pollut.
10: 453.
Raymont, J.E.G. and
J. Shields. 1963. Toxicity of copper and chromium inthe marine environment.
Int. Jour. Air Water Pollut. 7: 435.Rehwoldt, R., et al.
1972. The effect of increased temperature upon theacute toxicity of some heavy metal ions. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
8:
91.Rehwoldt, R., et al.
1973. The acute toxicity of some heavy metal ionstoward benthic organisms. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
10: 291.Reish, D.J.
1977. Effects of Chromium on the Life History of Capitellacapitata (Annelida: Polychaeta). In: F.J. Vernberg, et al. (eds.), Physio- -
logical Responses of Marine Biota to Pollutants. Academic Press, New York.
p. 119.
Reish, D.J. and R.S. Carr.
1978. The effect of heavy metals on the survival,reproduction, development and life cycles for two species of polychaetous
annelids. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 9: 24. (Table 3 available from author).
B-51
Reish, D.J., et al. 1976. The effect of heavy metals on laboratory populations
of two polychaetes with comparisons to the water quality conditions
and standards in southern California marine waters. Water Res. 10: 299.
Ruesink, R.G. and L.L. Smith,
Jr. 1975. The relationship of the 96-hourLC50 to the lethal threshold concentration of hexavalent chromium, phenol
and sodium pentachlorophenate for fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas
Rafinesque). Trans. Am. Fish Sot. 3: 567.
Ruthven, J.A. and
J. Cairns, Jr. 1973. Response of freshwater protozoanartificial communities to metals. Jour. Protozool. 20: 127.
Sauter, S., et al. 1976. Effects of exposure to heavy metals on selected
freshwater fish. Toxicity of copper, cadmium, chromium and lead to eggs and
fry of seven fish species. EPA 600/3-76-105. U.S. Environ. Prot.
Agency,Duluth, Minnesota.
Schaffer, E.D. and W.O. Pipes.
1973. Temperature and the toxicity ofchromate and arsenate to the rotifer, Philodina roseola. Water Res.
7: 1781.
Schiffman, R.H. and P.O. Fromm. 1959. Chromium induced changes in the
blood of rainbow
trout, Salmo qairdneri. Sewage Ind. Wastes. 31: 205.Sherwood, M.J. 1975. Toxicity of chromium to fish. Ann. Rep. S. Calif.
Coastal Water Res. Proj., El Segundo, California.
B-52
Shuster, C.N., Jr. and
B.J. Pringle. 1969. Trace metal accumulation by theAmerican oyster, Crassostrea virginica. 1968 Proc. Natl. Shellfish Assoc.
59: 91.
Stanley, R.A. 1974. Toxicity of heavy metals and salts to Eurasian watermilfoil
(Myriophyllum spicatum L.). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2: 331.
Staub, R.J., et al. 1973. Effects of industrial effluents on primary
phytoplankton indicators. Tenn. Water Resources Res. Center. Res. Rep. 26.
Strik,
J.J., et al. 1975. Toxicity of Chromium (VI) in Fish, with SpecialReference to Organoweights, Liver and Plasma Enzyme Activities, Blood Parameters
and Histological Alternations.
In: Sublethal Effects of Toxic Chemi- -cals on Aquatic Animals. Elsevier Sci. Publ. Co., Amsterdam. p. 31.
Sugatt, R.H. 1980. Effect of sublethal sodium dichromate exposure in
freshwater on the salinity tolerance and serum osmolarity of juvenile coho
salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, in seawater. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
9: 41.
Trabalka, J.R. and C.W. Gehrs. 1977. An observation on the toxicity of
hexavalent chromium to Daphnia magna. Toxicol. Lett. 1: 131,
Trama, F.B. and R.J. Benoit. 1960. Toxicity of hexavalent chromium to
bluegills. Jour. Pollut. Con. Fed. 32: 868.
Turnbull,
H., et aI. 1954. Toxicity of various refinery materials tofreshwater fish.
Ind. Eng. Chem. 46: 324.B-53
U.S. EPA. 1980a. Unpublished laboratory data. Env. Res. Lab., Duluth,
Minnesota.
U.S. EPA. 1980b. Unpublished laboratory data. Env. Res. Lab., Narragansett,
Rhode Island.
Wallen, I.E., et al. 1957. Toxicity to Gambusia affinis of certain pure
chemicals in turbid waters.
Sewage Ind. Wastes. 29: 695.Warnick, S.L. and H.L. Bell. 1969. The acute toxicity of some heavy metals
to different species of aquatic insects.
Jour. Water Pollut. Con. Fed.41: 280.
Zarafonetis,
J.H. and R.E. Hampton. 1974. Some effects of small concentrationsof chromium on growth and phytosynthesis in algae. Mich. Acad.
6: 417.
B-54
Mammalian Toxicology and Human Health Effects
INTRODUCTION
Chromium (Cr) is a common element, present in low concentrations
throughout nature. Its toxicity has long been recognized,
but detailed analysis of toxic effects is complicated by the occurrence
of many different compounds of the metal; these may contain
Cr in different valence states and are distinguished by their chemical,
physical, and toxicological properties.
This document considers relevant chemical and physical properties
of Cr compounds to which man may be exposed, and attempts to
evaluate possible health hazards associated with such exposures.
The general area of environmental effects of chromium compounds was
recently reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.
EPA, 1978); a valuable discussion of the medical and biological
effects of Cr in the environment is found also in a volume published
by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS, 1974). Occupational
hazards of chromium were assessed in a Criteria Document
prepared in 1975 [National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH), 1975]. Mertz (1969) provided a valuable survey of
the biochemical properties of Cr compounds. A general review of
the occurrence, metabolism, and effects of chromium has been presented
by the NAS (1977).
To avoid unnecessary duplication, previously reviewed material
will not be considered at great length except when it impinges
directly on present critical considerations. Detailed documentation
for most of the available information can be found in the earlier
reviews.
C-l
There is little need to discuss here the detailed chemistry of
chromium, as this subject has been adequately reviewed in the recent
past (U.S. EPA, 1978). However, an evaluation of the significance
of various routes of exposure to compounds containing Cr, and
of the factors determining rates of uptake and toxicity of such
compounds, requires an understanding of their physical properties
and of their chemical and biochemical reactions.
The metallic element Cr belongs to the first series of transition
elements, and occurs in nature primarily as compounds of its
trivalent [Cr (III)] form. Generally speaking, the hexavalent compounds
are relatively water-soluble and readily reduced to the more
insoluble and stable forms of Cr (III) by reaction with organic reducing
matter. Because large amounts of Cr (VI) are produced and
utilized in industry (primarily as chromates and dichromates), and
because of their ready solubility, traces of such compounds are
frequently found in natural waters.
As pointed out, Cr (VI) is rapidly reduced when in contact with
biological material. The reverse reaction is not known to occur in
the human body. Trivalent Cr forms stable hexacoordinate complexes
with many molecules of biochemical interest. Interaction of Cr (III)
with such compounds may involve binding to carboxy- groups of proteins
or smaller metabolites, coordination with certain amino
acids, and binding to nucleic acids and nucleoproteins. This last
reaction is of special significance in the consideration of the
carcinogenic potential of Cr compounds. The field was reviewed by
Mertz (1969) and it suffices here to emphasize the stability of
these Cr complexes, and the fact that the element is found combined
C-2
with both RNA and DNA. An effect of Cr on the tertiary structure of
nucleic acids is clearly indicated. In general, it may be concluded
that reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) and its subsequent coordination
to organic molecules of biochemical interest explain in
large measure the biological reactivity of Cr compounds. Thus, the
well-known reaction of Cr with skin proteins (i.e., the tanning
process) involves coordination sites of Cr (III). For reasons of
solubility, however, uptake of compounds of Cr (VI) by the living
organism generally exceeds that of Cr (III) compounds (see Acute,
Subacute, and Chronic Toxicity section).
A good illustration of the behavior of Cr compounds in biological
systems is furnished by the reaction of Cr with erythrocytes
(Gray and Sterling, 1950). These cells do not react to any significant
extent with Cr (III): in contrast, they rapidly take up anions
of hexavalent Cr compounds, presumably utilizing the broadly
specific anion transport facilitation in erythrocytes reviewed by
Fortes (1977). Thus, we may invoke as a likely explanation for the
greater toxicity of Cr (VI) than of Cr (III) compounds their more
rapid uptake by tissues due to their solubility and to the facilitation
of their translocation across biological membranes. Once
within cells, the Cr (VI) is likely to be reduced to the trivalent
state before reacting with cell constituents such as proteins and
nucleic acids. In the case of red cells, it is such an intracellular
reaction of Cr (III) with hemoglobin which explains the essentially
irreversible uptake of the metal and permits use of chromium-
51 as red cell marker.
C-3
Stable and soluble compounds of Cr (III) are found in many
biological
systems. Among these is the so-called glucose tolerancefactor (GTF) (Mertz, 1969), a compound of unknown structure
whose absence is believed responsible for symptoms of chromium
deficiency. In the form of GTF and perhaps of other similar complexes
Cr
(III) can also cross biological membranes with relativeease; thus it is readily absorbed from the intestine in this form
(Doisy, et al. 1971). One may recall in this connection the general
importance of metal ligands in determining movement of heavy
metals within the body (Collins, et al. 1961; Foulkes, 1974). It
is not surprising therefore that distribution of Cr in the body
also critically depends on
the presence of specific liqands (Mertz,1969).
Chromium plays a role in human nutrition. Because of this
fact, lowering of ambient Cr levels to a
value where total uptakemight lead to overt Cr deficiency must be avoided. Indeed, effects
of Cr deficiency in man and experimental animals have been described
(Mertz, 1969). Levels of Cr compounds required for optimal
nutrition fall greatly below those which have been reported to
cause toxic effects (see Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Toxicity section):
therefore normal nutritional levels need not be considered
further here. It
must be pointed out, however, that the Americandiet may be potentially deficient in Cr so that
some increased Cruptake
might be beneficial.Sources of chromium in the environment have been recently
reviewed (U.S. EPA, 1978). Although Cr is widely distributed, with
an average concentration in the continental crust of 125 mq/kg, it
is rarely found in significant concentrations in natural waters.
C-4
Air levels in nonurban areas
Usually fall below detection limitsand may be as low as 5 pg/m3. Much of the detectable Cr in air and
water is presumably derived from industrial orocesses, which in
1972 utilized 320,000 metric tons of the metal in the United States
alone. A significant fraction of this amount entered the environment:
additional amounts are contributed by combustion of coal and
other industrial processes (U.S. EPA, 1974). As a result, levels
of Cr in air exceeding 0.010 us/m3 have been reported from 59 of 186
urban areas examined (U.S. EPA, 1973). Mean concentrations of Cr
in 1,577 samples of surface water were reported as 9.7 ug/l (Kopp,
1969). The significance of 9.7 uq/l as a mean value is questionable
because only 25 percent of the samples tested contained any
detectable Cr. Ckcasional values of total Cr [Cr (III) and Cr
(VI)] exceeded 50 pg/l, a fact which must be noted in relation to
the recommended standard for domestic water supplies (see Existing
Guidelines and Standards section).
It is important to reemphasize at this time the analytical
difficulties attending estimation of low concentrations of Cr,
especially in biological materials. Additionally, the different
chemical species of Cr which may be present often cannot be clearly
separated. Considerable uncertainty attaches to the significance
of some results, particularly those obtained with some of the older
techniques. This tonic was considered in detail recently (U.S.
EPA, 1978).
c-5
EXPOSURE
Ingestion from Water and Food
At an average concentration of approximately 10 ug Cr/l drinking
water (Kopp, 1969), and a daily water consumption of 2 1, about
20 pg Cr would be ingested in water per day compared to about 50 to
100 ug/day in the American diet (Tipton, 1960). Dietary Cr intake
on a hospital diet averaged about 100 ug/day, while an estimate for
self-selected diets is 280 ug/day (NAS, 1974). Fractional absorption
of such an oral load from the intestine depends on the chemical
form in which the element is presented (see Introduction section).
In addition, even though mechanisms involved in the movement
of Cr compounds across intestinal epithelial barriers are not
understood, it is likely that the extent of this absorption will be
greatly influenced by the presence of other dietary constituents in
the intestinal lumen (MacKenzie, et al. 1958), as has frequently
been observed in the case of other ingested metals.
For a variety of reasons, therefore, net fractional absorotion
of Cr from the intestine is low and may amount to only a few percent
or even less (Yertz, 1969), depending especially on the chemical
form in which the element is ingested. Intake of Cr from the air
normally amounts to less than 1 ug/day (see Inhalation section),
and thus does not contribute significantly to normal Cr balance.
Average urinary excretion of Cr has been reported as 5 to 10 uq per
day (Volkl, 1971); recent work suggests that because of analytical
difficulties, actual values may be somewhat lower (C-uthrie, et al.
1979). In any case, it follows that the American diet may become
marginally deficient in this element, unable to provide the optimum
C-6
level required for normal function (see Introduction section).
This conclusion is supported by the finding that Cr levels in tissues
generally decrease with age (Yertz, 1969). The situation is
not greatly altered by application of Cr-containing fertilizers or
sewage sludges to agricultural land. Indeed, uptake of Cr by
plants from soil is generally low.
A bioconcentration factor (BCF) relates the concentration of a
chemical in aquatic animals to the concentration in the water in
which they live. An appropriate BCF can be used with data concerning
food intake to calculate the amount of chromium which might be
ingested from the consumption of fish and shellfish. Residue data
for a variety of inorganic compounds indicate that bioconcentration
factors for the edible portion of most aquatic animals is similar,
except that for some compounds bivalve molluscs (clams, oysters,
scallops, and mussels) should be considered a separate group. An
analysis (U.S. EPA, 1980a) of data from a food survey was used to
estimate that the per capita consumption of freshwater and estuarine
fish and shellfish is 6.5 g/day (Stephan, 1980). The per
capita consumption of bivalve molluscs is 0.8 g/day and that of all
other freshwater and estuarine fish and shellfish is 5.7 g/day.
The BCF for hexavalent chromium in fish muscle appears to be
less than 1.0 (Buhler,
et al. 1977; Fromm and Stokes, 1962) butvalues of 125 and 192 were obtained for oyster and blue mussel,
(U.S. EPA, 1980b),
respectively. For trivalent chromium BCF valuesof 116, 153, and 86 were obtained with the American oyster (Shuster
and Pringle, 1969) and soft shell clam and blue mussel (Cappuzzo
and Sasner, 1977), respectively. It appears that the two valence
C-7
states of chromium have about the same RCF values and that the qeometric
mean of 130 can be used for bivalve molluscs. If the values
of
0.5 and 130 are used with the consumption data, the weightedaverage bioconcentration factor for chromium and the edible portion
of all freshwater and estuarine aquatic organisms consumed by Americans
is calculated to be 16.
Inhalation
Levels of Cr in air have been carefully monitored. In the
United States in 1964, an average value of 0.015 ug/m3 was reported,
with a maximum of 0.35 ug/m3. wore recent values show levels below
detection limits in most nonurban and
some urban areas (U.S. EPA,1973); yearly averages exceeded 0.01 ug/m3 in only 59 of 186 urban
areas.
The chemical form of Cr in air will vary, depending primarily
on its source. There is little information on the size distribution
of the particles, but it is safe to assume that a significant
portion will
be in the respirable range. Uptake, of course, dependson the aerodynamic diameter of the particles. Assuming both
an average alveolar ventilation of
20 m3/day, and an alveolar retentionof 50 percent of Cr present
at a level of 0.015 ug/m3, alveolaruptake would only amount to approximately 0.2 ug/day. Additional
Cr could also be deposited in the upoer respiratory passages
and contribute ultimately to the intestinal load of Cr. In any
case,
inhalation under normal conditions does not contribute significantlyto total Cr
uptake.Even in the nonoccupational environment the concentration of
Cr in air may rise significantly
above normal background levels.C-8
Thus, increased ambient concentrations of Cr have been reported in
the vicinity of industrial sites (U.S. EPA, 1978). In the proximity
of water cooling towers, for instance, where Cr was employed as
a corrosion inhibitor, air levels of Cr as high as 0.05 ug/m’ have
been repor ted. However, even such a relatively high level is not
likely to greatly alter total Cr uptake. The possibil-ity that
smoking might contribute to the pulmonary load of Cr has not been
fully evaluated.
Of course, if the lungs represent a target organ for Cr, additional
pulmonary loads may assume significance even though total
body Cr may not have been materially increased by the inhalation
exposure. Although such exposure can lead to a significant increase
in urinary excretion of Cr, it is not clear to what extent
the Cr added to systemic pools originated in the lungs or was
alternatively absorbed from the intestines following pulmonary
clearance of the Cr-containing particles. In any case, pulmonary
Cr does not appear to be in full equilibrium with other Cr pools in
the body. This conclusion is based on the fact that the Cr content
of the lungs, unlike that of the rest of the body, may actually
increase with age (Mertz, 1969). Prolonged pulmonary retention of
inhaled Cr is also reflected by the fact that the Pulmonary concentration
of the element usually exceeds that of other organs. The
relatively slow clearance of Cr from the lungs was also noted by
Baetjer, et al. (1959a), who found that 60 days after intratracheal
instillation into guinea pigs, 20 percent of a dose of CrC13 remained
in this tissue.
c-9
Dermal
Compounds of Cr permeate the skin fairly readily when applied
in the hexavalent form: trivalent Cr compounds react directly with
epithelial and dermal tissue. Cutaneous exposure is primarily a
problem of the workplace; many lesions have been described under
these conditions, including ulceration and sensitization. There is
little evidence, however, to suggest that cutaneous absorption significantly
contributes to the total body load of Cr in the normal
environment.
Evaluation of Relative Contribution of Different Exposure ?outes
to Body Burden
The three previous sections review briefly the uptake of Cr by
ingestion, inhalation, and cutaneous absorption. Yone of the three
routes of entry will lead to harmful levels of Cr in the body when
exposure involves only the low levels of the element normally found
in food, water, and air. Indeed, it may be recalled (see Ingestion
section) that the average American may actually suffer from mild Cr
deficiency. The major fraction of body Cr originating in the qenera1
environment is contributed by ingestion. In industrial surroundings,
by contrast, other routes of exposure may become more
significant. Uptake of Cr by inhalation may pose special. risks
here. This conclusion follows from the fact that the lungs tend to
retain Cr more than do other tissues (see Inhalation section). The
Carcinogenicity section deals further with pulmonary effects of
exposure to Cr in air.
Under normal conditions of exnosure, considerable variabilitv
has been observed in the Cr concentrations of different tissues.
C-10
It is difficult to assess, however, to what extent the wide range
of values reported reflects analytical problems rather than true
individual variations. As a first approximation, an average level
of around 2 ug Cr/g ash may be derived from the work of Tipton and
Cook (1963) and of Imbus, et al. (1963) for most soft tissues and
for
whole blood of nonexposed humans. Levels of Cr in the lungs maybe ten times higher: there is no evidence to suggest that Cr is a
bone-seeking element. If we further assume that the average ash
content of soft tissues approximates 1 percent of fresh weight, a
total body burden in the adult of the order of 2 mg may be calculated.
Results of Schroeder, et al. (1962) showed values of Cr in
human tissues of the order of 0.05 ug/g fresh weight, which would
correspond to a total adult body burden of around 3 to 4 mg; Schroeder
(1965) suggested an upper limit of 6 mg Cr in a 70 kg man.
These values are presented here to indicate the net result of Cr
uptake by ingestion, inhalation, and cutaneous absorption under
normal conditions. As pointed
out, this body burden may actuallyrepresent a marginally deficient state.
PHARMACOYINETICS
Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion
Analysis of the movement of Cr through various body pools, and
determination of the size and turnover rates of these pools, are
complicated by several facts. In the first place it is likely that
different Cr compounds will exhibit different kinetic characteristics
in the body; this is well illustrated
by the wider body distributionof Cr injected in the form of the
glucose tolerance factorthan when administered
as CrC13 (Mertz, 1969). Second, thec-11
chemical methods emoloyed for the estimation of biological Cr concentrations
do not adequately distinguish between different forms
of Cr present in the original sample. For instance, the results of
Schroeder, et al. (1962) suggest that both hexavalent and trivalent
Cr may occur in the ash of biological materials. However, precise
conclusions on this point are difficult because the chemical forms
of Cr may be changed during the ashing. Third, difficulties of
interpretation arise from the fact that one chemical species of Cr
may be transformed into another in the body, for instance as bv
reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III).
The complexity of the pharmacokinetics of Cr to be predicted
from such considerations is observed both in man and in experimental
animals. This situation may be illustrated by reference to the
urinary excretion of Cr under normal conditions. In man, the kidneys
account for 80 Percent or more of Cr excretion by nonexposed
individuals (NAS, 1974) ; urinary excretion amounts on the average
to 5 to 10 pg/day or less (see Ingestion from Water and Food section).
Such a value corresponds to less than 1 percent of the total
body burden as estimated in the Evaluation of Relative Contribution
of Different Exposure Routes to Body Burden section: it also ap-
Proximately equals the average daily dietary retention of Cr (see
Ingestion from Water and Food section). The body thus apsears
roughly to be in steady state with regard to Cr. It would not be
correct to infer, however, that the turnover rates of the various
Cr
pools in the body all fall below 1 percent/day: this would betrue only if Cr taken in by one of the routes of entry discussed in
the Exnosure section always equilibrated evenly with different body
pools.
c-12
Although little information is available on changes in specific
radioactivities of Cr in different body compartments following
administration of "Cr, there is strong evidence to show that different
compartments exhibit distinctly different turnover kinetics.
Lim (1978) reports the kinetics of radiochromium (III) distribution
in humans. Three major accumulation and clearance components
were found for liver, spleen, and thigh; liver and spleen
contained the higher concentrations. Normally in man, the highest
concentration of Cr is found in the lungs, and oulmonarv levels
tend to rise with age while the Cr content of other tissues falls.
Apparently the lung obtains most of its Cr from the air, not from
oral loads, and pulmonary Cr does not come into equilibrium with
other body pools of Cr (see Inhalation section).
Similar conclusions on nonequilibration of body pools can be
drawn from measurements on the excretion kinetics of 51 Cr (ISI) injected
into rats. At least three kinetic compartments were observed
in this case (Flertz, et al. 1965), with half-lives respectively
of 0.5, 5.9, and 83.4 days. The Cr in a slowly equilibrating
compartment in man was estimated to oossess a half-life of 616
days (U.S. EPA, 1978). Injection of 1 mg of unlabeled Cr into
rats, a very large dose compared to the oresumptive body burden as
calculated in the Evaluation of Relative Contributions of Different
Exposure !?outes to Body Burdens section, exerted little effect on
the rate of tracer excretion from the slow compartment. The finding
that even a very large excess of Cr does not affect this compartment
further indicates that ingested or injected Cr does not
c-13
necessarily pass through every body compartment on its way to
excretion. Finally, this conclusion is supported by the observation
that the pool from which Cr (at least in some systems) enters
plasma following administration of glucose is not readily labeled
by injected 51 Cr (administered as CrC13) (Mertz, 1969).
As is the case with other metals, chromium normally circulates
in plasma primarily in a bound, nondiffusible form (Mertz, 1969).
At low levels of Cr (III) the iron-binding protein siderophilin
complexes most of the Cr present, but at higher levels of Cr other
plasma proteins also become involved. The high affinity of Cr
(III) for siderophilin presumably reflects the fact that this protein
provides the normal mechanism of transport for Cr to the tissues.
A small fraction of plasma Cr is also Dresent in a more diffusible
form, complexed to various small organic molecules which
are filtered at the glomerulus and partially reabsorbed in the
renal tubule. The suggestion that this reabsorption may involve an
active transport process (Davidson, et al. 1974) is not suDported
by the evidence presented. Chromium very tightly bound in lowmolecular
weight complexes such as Cr-EDTA may serve as a glomerular
indicator, being freely filtered but not reabsorbed (Stacy and
Thorburn, 1966).
The half-life of plasma Cr is relatively short, and cells tend
to accumulate the element to levels higher than that present in
plasma. Presumably this accumulation results from intracellular
trapping of Cr compounds which penetrate cells in the hexavalent
form and then react with cell constituents, such as hemoglobin in
the case of the erythrocyte. Within the cells, Cr (VI) will be re-
C-14
duced to Cr (III) and remain trapped in this form. In any case, the
lack of equilibration of Cr between plasma and cells renders invalid
the use of plasma levels as indicators of total exposure.
Another reason for the limited usefulness of plasma Clr levels
as a measure of body burden is the likelihood that plasma Cr can be
identified with one of the rapidly excreted Cr compartments discussed
above. This
is suggested by the finding that even though therise in plasma Cr reported by some authors to occur after administration
of a glucose load is not derived from a rapidly labeled
poolr it is followed by increased urinary excretion of Cr (Mertz,
1969). In summary, little can be concluded at this time about the