Friedman Schmitt Construction: Failure to Give Notice on Renovations
This page continues the discussion in the Friedman Schmitt case. The construction company was charged for failure to give notice of renovations that involved the removal of asbestos. Exposure to asbestos is known to cause serious diseases such as mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer and asbestosis.
In renovations that exceed the threshold requiring an application notice, the Asbestos NESHAP requires each owner or operator of a renovation activity to provide the Administrator written notice of the intention to renovate, with such notice postmarked or delivered "[a]t least 10 working days before asbestos stripping or removal work or any other activity begins (such as site preparation that would break up, dislodge or similarly disturb asbestos material).
In the present case, Friedman & Schmitt admitted in their Answer that they did not provide the notice required by 40 C.F.R. § 61.145(b) prior to removing RACM from both the Calderwood Apartments and Building #2.
Accordingly, we find that Friedman & Schmitt violated 40 C.F.R. § 61.145(b) (1996).
Weitz & Luxenberg is a leading plaintiffs' law firm that has represented people affected by mesothelioma for over 20 years. Men and women diagnosed with mesothelioma caused by asbestos exposure may be entitled to compensation from the companies responsible for their disease. If you would like a free consultation or more information about your legal options, please complete the form below, and a representative of our law firm will contact you as soon as possible.

Friedman Schmitt Construction Case and wet RACM removal