HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE

Asbestos NESHAP Applies to Friedman and Schmitt

In the present case, Friedman & Schmitt’s Answer states as follows:

The allegations giving rise to this action * * * concern the renovation and/or demolition of property forming part of Town & Country Village, a shopping complex in Sacramento, California. Respondent MORTON FRIEDMAN was the owner of the property in August, 1997, when the alleged violations occurred. * * * Altogether, there were ten buildings involved in the development project in the summer and fall of 1997, as indicated on the attached map.

From this statement in their Answer, Friedman & Schmitt have admitted that the work performed at the 10 to 11 buildings was part of a single construction project for the development of a shopping mall.

The record also demonstrates that Schmitt’s removal of the linoleum from the Calderwood Apartments was part of Friedman & Schmitt’s overall Town & Country Village redevelopment project undertaken in the summer of 1997.

In particular, Mr. Friedman demolished the Calderwood Apartments on the side of Calderwood Lane adjacent to the Town & Country Village, and combined that portion of the Calderwood Apartments with the Town & Country Village, at 298, in order to construct a larger building to attract an anchor grocery store to the Town & Country Village, at 296.

As noted in the factual background above, Friedman & Schmitt’s counsel succinctly described the development project as follows:

"Back in the summer of 1997, there was a major renovation project that was going on at the Town & Country Village. * * * There were * * * either 10 or 12 buildings, actually, that were going through renovation or demolition stage to make way for some larger buildings."

Courtesy of The EPA
Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos


IN THIS SECTION
Meaning of facility
Regulatory text
Preamble to Asbestos NESHAP
EPA asbestos definitions
Asbestos NESHAP Applies
Friedman Schmitt Case involves a facility
Court rejects Friedman Schmitt argument
Calderwood linoleum and asbestos
Vinyl floor RACM
Calderwood claims
EPA's Asbestos Threshold
RACM Applicability Standard
RACM Applicability Summary
Friedman and Schmitt violation of NESHAP
Failure to Give Notice on Renovations
Removal of wet RACM
Adequately wet RACM
RACM Report from Friedman Schmitt Construction
Waste shipment records
Penalty issues
Conclusion


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Asbestos
Asbestos Help
News & Warnings

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

vea también:

RACM Applicability Summary Summary of Friedman Schmitt Construction RACM Applicability Standard
About Friedman Construction RACM Applicability summary

Removal of wet RACM Friedman Schmitt Construction Case and wet RACM removal
Read about Friedman Schmitt Construction Case and wet RACM removal

Friedman Schmitt case EPA case about Friedman Schmitt Construction and asbestos floor
Read about Friedman Schmitt Construction EPA asbestos floor case