Statutory Provisions
The statute also provides general criteria that the Agency must consider in assessing a civil administrative penalty. Those criteria in relevant part are as follows:
In determining the amount of any penalty to be assessed under this section * * * , the Administrator * * * shall take into consideration (in addition to such other factors as justice may require) the size of the business, the economic impact of the penalty on the business, the violator’s full compliance history and good faith efforts to comply, the duration of the violation as established by any credible evidence * * * , payment by the violator of penalties previously assessed for the same violation, the economic benefit of noncompliance, and the seriousness of the violation.
In addition, the regulations governing this proceeding impose several considerations for the determination of an appropriate penalty. In particular, the regulations provide as follows:
Amount of civil penalty. If the Presiding Officer determines that a violation has occurred and the complaint seeks a civil penalty, the Presiding Officer shall determine the amount of the recommended civil penalty based on the evidence in the record and in accordance with any penalty criteria set forth in the Act. The Presiding Officer shall consider any civil penalty guidelines issued under the Act. The Presiding Officer shall explain in detail in the initial decision how the penalty to be assessed corresponds to any penalty criteria set forth in the Act. If the Presiding Officer decides to assess a penalty different in amount from the penalty proposed by complaint, the Presiding Officer shall set forth in the initial decision the specific reasons for the increase or decrease.
Courtesy of The EPA
Friedman Schmitt challenge gravity-based penalty