HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE
English En Français

FREE LEGAL REVIEW

First Name
Last Name
Home Phone
Work Phone
City and State
Email
Were you diagnosed with Asbestosis? Yes
No
Were you diagnosed with lung cancer? Yes
No
Were you diagnosed with Mesothelioma? yes
no
What is your date of diagnosis?
Additional Comments
Best time to call?

Size-of-Violator Component of the Penalty

Mr. Trotter calculated the penalty increase for the “size-of-violator” to be $62,500 to take into account Mr. Friedman’s net worth.

Mr. Trotter arrived at this increase by applying the guidance of the General CAA Penalty Policy suggesting incremental increases in the amount of the penalty based on the violator’s net worth and by utilizing a discretionary limit equal to 50% of the preliminary deterrence amount of the penalty. The preliminary deterrence amount is the sum of the gravity-based penalties for each violation, the economic benefit component, and the size-of-violator component. Where the discretionary 50% limit is applied, the size-of-violator component should not exceed one-half of this sum.

Based on Mr. Friedman’s substantial net worth, the Region reasoned that the General CAA Penalty Policy would ordinarily authorize a penalty increase of more than $70,000 for the “size of business” component. However, since the other components of the Region’s proposed preliminary deterrence penalty equaled $62,500, Mr. Trotter testified that he calculated the “size of business” component as limited to $62,500 consistent with the General CAA Penalty Policy’s guidance that the size-of-violator component may be limited to 50% of the preliminary deterrence amount.

Courtesy of The EPA

Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos


Mesothelioma
Asbestos
Asbestos Help
News & Warnings
Friedman Schmitt case
IN THIS SECTION
penalty criteria
Statutory provisions
statutory requirements
Board calculates the penalty
NESHAP penalty policy
Penalty evidence
Asbestos penalty policy
Calculations of economic benefit
Court analysis of penalty calculations
Penalty for notice violation
Wetting requirement
Gravity based penalty
Court assess benefit penalty
Violator component of penalty
Asbestos penalty policy
Preliminary deterrence penalty
Seeking penalty reduction
General CAA penalty policy

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

Asbestos penalty policy Construction company argues over asbestos penalty policy
Read about construction company arguing over asbestos penalty policy

Seeking penalty reduction Asbestos defendant seeks penalty reduction
Read about asbestos defendant seeking penalty reduction

Penalty issues Friedman and Schmitt Co. penalized for asbestos NESHAP violations
Read about Friedman and Schmitt Co.'s three asbestos violations