HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE
English En Français

FREE LEGAL REVIEW

First Name
Last Name
Home Phone
Work Phone
City and State
Email
Were you diagnosed with Asbestosis? Yes
Were you diagnosed with lung cancer? Yes
Were you diagnosed with Mesothelioma? yes
What is your date of diagnosis?
Additional Comments
Best time to call?

Roberts’ Work History Results in Mesothelioma Diagnosis

This section of the Opinion in PSI Energy v. Roberts details Roberts’ work history. Roberts was exposed to asbestos at his workplace, which led to his eventual diagnosis of mesothelioma.

In the late 1960’s and into the 1970’s, Roberts often worked at PSI’s Dresser generating station. According to Roberts, the asbestos insulation at Dresser was in very poor condition, torn up, and “raggy.” Id. at 2740.

In addition to exposure to asbestos as a result of his own work at PSI, Roberts was also exposed to asbestos as a result of the work of PSI employees and other PSI contractors. For example, the boiler was often damaged, making it necessary for PSI employees to remove and dispose of asbestos insulation that was damaged.

Numerous barrels of asbestos insulation were removed, causing asbestos dust. Roberts and others worked nearby without protective clothing, masks, or respirators. No one from PSI told Roberts to protect himself or ACandS to protect its employees from the airborne asbestos dust that the PSI employees were generating from their own work.

Roberts was also exposed to asbestos in 1973 when other PSI contractors were performing demolition work at the Dresser plant. The salvage crew allowed pipes covered in asbestos insulation to fall to the ground where the asbestos insulation “just literally exploded” and “flew off” of the pipes. Id. at 2748-2749.

While working at PSI’s Cayuga generating plant in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, Roberts was also exposed to asbestos as the result of the activities of PSI’s own employees.

Specifically, Roberts was exposed to airborne asbestos fibers when PSI employees drilled holes in asbestos pipe covering, PSI’s traveling maintenance crew performed work at Cayuga, and PSI’s maintenance people ground gaskets and otherwise caused asbestos materials to break apart while working over his head.

Moreover, it was common at PSI to have asbestos insulation materials lying around on the floor until a PSI employee cleaned them up. While the insulation was lying on the floor, it was broken up and spread to lower floors through the vast areas of grating, which acted like a “cheese grater.” Id. at 2783-2784.

This type of exposure occurred “quite frequently” when Roberts was working at PSI’s Cayuga plant. Id. at 2784-2785.

Courtesy of the Indiana Court of Appeals and the State of Indiana

Other helpful links:

Asbestos Asbestos
Asbestos and lung cancer Asbestos and lung cancer
Mesothelioma attorney Mesothelioma attorney
Mesothelioma Lawyer Mesothelioma lawyer
Asbestos attorney Asbestos attorney

Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos
Real Stories


IN THIS SECTION
Liability premise in mesothelioma insulator case
Liability premise in mesothelioma defendant appeal
Liability premise in mesothelioma landowner appeal
Jury’s liability theories in mesothelioma appeal
Mesothelioma: The Facts
Link between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma
Work history of mesothelioma employee victim
Witness testimony in mesothelioma worker case
Roberts mesothelioma diagnosis in PSI appeal
Mesothelioma jury verdict in PSI Energy v. Roberts
Mesothelioma case analysis: PSI Energy v. Roberts
Liability reexamined in Indiana mesothelioma case
Restatement of Torts examined in mesothelioma case
Restatement of Torts section in mesothelioma case
Restatement of Torts in mesothelioma case
Analysis: Restatement of Torts, mesothelioma case
Watson v. Ziegart cited in mesothelioma appeal
Premises liability reexamined in mesothelioma case
Liability theory reexamined in mesothelioma case
Appeals Court affirms denial in mesothelioma case
Footnotes in Opinion of mesothelioma case
Notes in mesothelioma case PSI Energy v. Roberts
Conclusion of notes in mesothelioma case


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Mesothelioma Resource Center
Mesothelioma
Information about Diagnosis
Latest News
Verdicts and Settlements

Mesothelioma Lawyer

Asbestos Lawyer

Mesothelioma Attorney

Asbestos Attorney

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

Roberts mesothelioma diagnosis in PSI appeal W.L. Roberts diagnosis of mesothelioma detailed in PSI’s appeal
Diagnostic details on mesothelioma victim W.L. Roberts in PSI appeal.

Mesothelioma case analysis: PSI Energy v. Roberts Analysis in mesothelioma case of PSI Energy v. Roberts.
Case analysis of an Indiana insulator diagnosed with mesothelioma.

Mesothelioma victim wins appeal Indiana Court affirms opinion for mesothelioma employee, Roberts
PSI Energy challenged court ruling for a mesothelioma victim, Roberts