The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Why Choose Us?   Results   Search

Drugs Avandia Research Center

Actos Study

in this section: Firm's Press Release, 10.1.07 | Another FDA Warning? 10.24.07 | avandia drug warning | Study Reveals Risks, 6.6.07 | FDA Warning, 5.22.07 | Secret Avandia Vote | Veterans Affairs: Avandia | FDA Approval of Avandia | NEJM Study | Warning Letter, 2001 | Sales Plunge | NEJM Update, 6.5.07 | FDA Safety Information | FDA Warning, 6.6.07 | Scientists Silenced | Dallas Lawsuit | Patients Switch Meds | Avandia Prescriptions Fall | Updated Study, 7.12.07 | Avandia Panel, 7.25.07 | Second Black Box? | Senators Testify | Experts Cite Risks | Black Box Warning | 9.12.07 Study Analysis | Actos Study | Arkansas Lawsuit | Weakens Bones | JAMA Report, 12.7.07 | Avandia Diabetes Pills | Avandia Warning

Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Study: Actos Drug Controls Blood Sugar Levels Better than Avandia

New clinical trial results out of Europe conclude that patients who get a starting dose of diabetes drug Actos, manufactured by Takeda Pharmaceutical, have better control of blood sugar and lipid levels than those who take GlaxoSmithKline's diabetes drug Avandia.

These recent findings were relayed in a medical meeting in Amsterdam. They will likely bolster Takeda's contention that Actos (known generically as pioglitazone) is a better drug than Avandia (known generically as rosiglitazone), which has been linked to heart attack risks.

The study involved an analysis of data from the first three months of a six-month head-to-head study of the two drugs.

It found a starting dose of 30 milligrams of Actos was more effective than a starting dose of 4 milligrams of Avandia in improving blood sugar levels.

Scientists presented the research on the two drugs at the annual meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

If you or a loved one has suffered cardiac complications after ingesting Avandia, you deserve the guidance of a knowledgeable drug attorney.

Get a free case review by filling out the form below.

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

When did you start taking Avandia?
What cardiovascular problems did you experience with the drug?
What was the date you experienced cardiac complications?
Did you have any cardiovascular disease before taking Avandia?
Do you smoke?
How did you learn of Weitz & Luxenberg?
Contact Name
Email Address
Phone Number (optional)


see also:

Senators Testify Senators Testify in Investigation That FDA Pulled Reviewer off Avandia
Avandia Scientist Says in Investigation that the FDA Removed Him

Another FDA Warning? 10.24.07 New Avandia Setback? Possible Second Black Box Warning on Heart Attack
GlaxoSmithKline May Get New Avandia Black Box Warning for Heart Attack

News & Warnings Avandia Breaking News: Glaxo Warned in 2001 about Misleading Marketing
Bloomberg News: FDA Warned Glaxo about Avandia Marketing in 2001

Name Phone Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!   strictly confidential
Your Question

Click here
for a free case review

$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims

$25 million jury verdict — brake reliner

$5.8 million settlement — failure to perform timely C-Section

$30 million verdict — 7 former power-plant workers suffering from asbestos-related illnesses

$6 million settlement — pediatric malpractice case

$14 million consolidated verdict — 5 asbestos-related cancer suits: shipyards/powerhouses/construction

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$3.5 million — 2 asbestos exposure cases

$600,000 settlement — motor vehicle negligence resulting in serious injury

$44 million verdict — 5 asbestos cases, including $11.6 million awarded to widow of sheet metal worker who died of mesothelioma

$1.6 million settlement — suicide after premature hospital discharge

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$1.5 million settlement — construction worker fell off elevated train tracks

$750,000 settlement — defective construction equipment resulted in serious injury to worker


Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases, get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 20 years, we’ve collected more than $1.3 billion for plaintiffs.