HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE
English En Français

FREE LEGAL REVIEW

First Name
Last Name
Home Phone
Work Phone
City and State
Email
Were you diagnosed with Asbestosis? Yes
No
Were you diagnosed with lung cancer? Yes
No
Were you diagnosed with Mesothelioma? yes
no
What is your date of diagnosis?
Additional Comments
Best time to call?

FRIEDMAN & SCHMITT CO.
Construction company penalized for 3 asbestos violations

Friedman and Schmitt penalized for three asbestos violations

Although the ALJ concluded that Friedman & Schmitt were not liable for the alleged violations of the Asbestos NESHAP, the ALJ nevertheless provided an analysis of what he believed an appropriate penalty would be in the event that the Board disagreed with his liability determination.

In this alternative analysis, the ALJ rejected the Region’s proposed penalty of $134,300, determining instead that $3,500 would be an appropriate penalty. For the following reasons, we adopt certain aspects of the ALJ’s analysis and reject others.

As explained below, we assess a penalty of $30,980 for Friedman & Schmitt’s three violations of the Asbestos NESHAP.

Courtesy of The EPA

Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos


IN THIS SECTION
penalty criteria
Statutory provisions
statutory requirements
Board calculates the penalty
NESHAP penalty policy
Penalty evidence
Asbestos penalty policy
Calculations of economic benefit
Court analysis of penalty calculations
Penalty for notice violation
Wetting requirement
Gravity based penalty
Court assess benefit penalty
Violator component of penalty
Asbestos penalty policy
Preliminary deterrence penalty
Seeking penalty reduction
General CAA penalty policy


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Asbestos
Asbestos Help
News & Warnings
Friedman Schmitt case

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

Statutory provisions Friedman Schmitt Construction case and statutory provisions
Read about Friedman Schmitt Construction case and statutory provisions

Violator component of penalty Violator component of penalty in Friedman Schmitt case
Read about violator component penalty in Friedman Schmitt case

Waste shipment records Schmitt Construction EPA case and waste shipment records
Read about Schmitt Construction EPA case and waste shipment records