HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE
English En Français

FREE LEGAL REVIEW

First Name
Last Name
Home Phone
Work Phone
City and State
Email
Were you diagnosed with Asbestosis? Yes
No
Were you diagnosed with lung cancer? Yes
No
Were you diagnosed with Mesothelioma? yes
no
What is your date of diagnosis?
Additional Comments
Best time to call?

Carbaugh v. Asbestos Corporation: Introduction of Opinion and Decision in Utah Case

Read the introduction of the opinion and decision in the Carbaugh case, where a number of asbestos plaintiffs sought relief after finding that their medical expert, although a licensed and credentialed physician in other states, was not licensed to practice medicine in Utah.

Unlicensed to practice medicine in Utah, Dr. Alvin Schonfeld set up short-term medical clinics in various hostelries in Salt Lake City, Utah, for the purpose of examining persons who suspected that they suffered from asbestos-related diseases. Dr. Schonfeld confirmed the suspicions of forty-seven individuals, whom he diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases. These forty-seven became the plaintiffs in the four cases we have heard together on this appeal. The plaintiffs sued a legion of entities that they believed were legally accountable for their asbestos-related illnesses.

The plaintiffs designated Dr. Schonfeld as their medical expert. He was to present his opinion testimony about the causes of the plaintiffs’ conditions. The defendants, however, sought summary judgment on the ground that Dr. Schonfeld had practiced medicine in Utah without a license in violation of the Utah Medical Practice Act (or the Act), Utah Code Ann. §§ 58-67-101 to -803 (2002 & Supp. 2005), and was therefore unreliable as an expert.

The district court agreed, granted the defendants’ motions, and dismissed the plaintiffs’ cases because, without the services of Dr. Schonfeld, they could not present the necessary expert testimony to sustain their claims. We hold that Dr. Schonfeld did not violate the Utah Medical Practice Act when he conducted pre-testimony examinations of the plaintiffs and that, therefore, Dr. Schonfeld did not disqualify himself from testifying by performing the examinations.

Courtesy of the Utah State Courts

Other helpful links:

Asbestos Asbestos
Asbestos and lung cancer Asbestos and lung cancer
Mesothelioma attorney Mesothelioma attorney
Mesothelioma Lawyer Mesothelioma lawyer
Asbestos attorney Asbestos attorney

Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos


IN THIS SECTION
Introduction to Utah Carbaugh asbestos opinion
Utah opinion background in Carbaugh asbestos case
Standard for review in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case
District court erred Utah Carbaugh asbestos case
Professional licensing Utah Carbaugh asbestos case
Expert testimony in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case
Discussion of Utah Carbaugh asbestos case
Expert testimony in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case
Medical expert in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case
Court to interpret Utah Carbaugh asbestos witness
Licensing standards in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case
Utah District Court reversed in Carbaugh asbestos
Footnotes in Utah opinion of Carbaugh v. Asbestos


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Asbestos
Asbestos Help
News & Warnings
Asbestos News

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

Standard for review in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case Standard for the review of the facts in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case
Questions on the standard for review in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case?

Expert testimony in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case Medical expert testimony evaluated in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case
Expert testimony viability in Utah Carbaugh asbestos case

Utah court decision in Carbaugh asbestos appeal Utah Supreme Court decision in Carbaugh v. Asbestos Corporation
Utah Carbaugh plaintiffs appeal decision on unlicensed asbestos expert