HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1-3

1. Respondents, L.G. Kienast Utility Construction and Lu Vern G. Kienast, are each a "person" as that term is defined by § 302(e) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7602(e).

2. Respondents are each an "owner or operator of a demolition or renovation activity" as defined at 40 C.F.R. § 61.141.

3. The Hudson facility is a "facility" as defined at 40 C.F.R. § 61.141.

Courtesy of The Environmental Protection Agency
Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos
Real Stories


Mesothelioma
Mesothelioma Resource Center
Mesothelioma
Information about Diagnosis
Latest News
Asbestos News Reports
Mesothelioma & Mining
Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Kienast Utility Construction
IN THIS SECTION
Hudson Facility
Hudson Demolition Issues
Wet RACM
Disposing of Waste Material
Respondents' Penalties

Mesothelioma Lawyer

Asbestos Lawyer

Mesothelioma Attorney

Asbestos Attorney

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

Wet RACM Kienast failure to wet the RACM during asbestos removal
Kienast Construction did not properly wet the asbestos RACM

Hudson Facility Asbestos troubles for Hudson Facility in Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Conclusions of law for the Hudson Facility asbestos site

Civil Penalty Clean Air Act violations for asbestos on behalf of Kienast
Kienast responsible for Clean Air Act violations regarding asbestos