HOME ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH

Asbestos Legislation: FAIR Act of 2005

Your Asbestos Lawyers provides you with House Resolution 1360: FAIR Act of 2005. If you have been injured by Asbestos, this document may help you understand Asbestos legislation. To find out if you have a claim, use our FREE Asbestos Case Evaluator.

SEC. 114. ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATIONS AND CLAIM AWARDS.

    (a) In General-

      (1) REVIEW OF CLAIMS- The Administrator shall, in accordance with this section, determine whether each claim filed under this Act satisfies the requirements for eligibility for an award under this Act and, if so, the value of the award. In making such determinations, the Administrator shall consider the claim presented by the claimant, the factual and medical evidence submitted by the claimant in support of the claim, the medical determinations of any Physicians Panel to which a claim is referred under section 121, and the results of such investigation as the Administrator may deem necessary to determine whether the claim satisfies the criteria for eligibility established by this Act.

      (2) ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE- The Administrator may request the submission of medical evidence in addition to the minimum requirements of section 113(c) if necessary or appropriate to make a determination of eligibility for an award, in which case the cost of obtaining such additional information or testing shall be borne by the Office.

    (b) Proposed Decisions- Not later than 90 days after the filing of a claim, the Administrator shall provide to the claimant (and the claimant's representative) a proposed decision accepting or rejecting the claim in whole or in part and specifying the amount of the proposed award, if any. The proposed decision shall be in writing, shall contain findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall contain an explanation of the procedure for obtaining review of the proposed decision.

    (c) Review of Proposed Decisions-

      (1) RIGHT TO HEARING-

        (A) IN GENERAL- Any claimant not satisfied with a proposed decision of the Administrator under subsection (b) shall be entitled, on written request made within 90 days after the date of the issuance of the decision, to a hearing on the claim of that claimant before a representative of the Administrator. At the hearing, the claimant shall be entitled to present oral evidence and written testimony in further support of that claim.

        (B) CONDUCT OF HEARING- When practicable, the hearing will be set at a time and place convenient for the claimant. In conducting the hearing, the representative of the Administrator shall not be bound by common law or statutory rules of evidence, by technical or formal rules of procedure, or by section 554 of title 5, United States Code, except as provided by this Act, but shall conduct the hearing in such manner as to best ascertain the rights of the claimant. For this purpose, the representative shall receive such relevant evidence as the claimant adduces and such other evidence as the representative determines necessary or useful in evaluating the claim.

        (C) REQUEST FOR SUBPOENAS-

          (i) IN GENERAL- A claimant may request a subpoena but the decision to grant or deny such a request is within the discretion of the representative of the Administrator. The representative may issue subpoenas for the attendance and testimony of witnesses, and for the production of books, records, correspondence, papers or other relevant documents. Subpoenas are issued for documents only if they are relevant and cannot be obtained by other means, and for witnesses only where oral testimony is the best way to ascertain the facts.

          (ii) REQUEST- A claimant may request a subpoena only as part of the hearing process. To request a subpoena, the requester shall--

            (I) submit the request in writing and send it to the representative as early as possible, but no later than 30 days after the date of the original hearing request; and

            (II) explain why the testimony or evidence is directly relevant to the issues at hand, and a subpoena is the best method or opportunity to obtain such evidence because there are no other means by which the documents or testimony could have been obtained.

          (iii) FEES AND MILEAGE- Any person required by such subpoena to attend as a witness shall be allowed and paid the same fees and mileage as are paid witnesses in the district courts of the United States.

      (2) REVIEW OF WRITTEN RECORD- In lieu of a hearing under paragraph (1), any claimant not satisfied with a proposed decision of the Administrator shall have the option, on written request made within 90 days after the date of the issuance of the decision, of obtaining a review of the written record by a representative of the Administrator. If such review is requested, the claimant shall be afforded an opportunity to submit any written evidence or argument which he or she believes relevant.

    (d) Final Decisions-

      (1) IN GENERAL- If the period of time for requesting review of the proposed decision expires and no request has been filed, or if the claimant waives any objections to the proposed decision, the Administrator shall issue a final decision. If such decision materially differs from the proposed decision, the claimant shall be entitled to review of the decision under subsection (c).

      (2) TIME AND CONTENT- If the claimant requests review of all or part of the proposed decision the Administrator shall issue a final decision on the claim not later than 180 days after the request for review is received, if the claimant requests a hearing, or not later than 90 days after the request for review is received, if the claimant requests review of the written record. Such decision shall be in writing and contain findings of fact and conclusions of law.

    (e) Representation- A claimant may authorize an attorney or other individual to represent him or her in any proceeding under this Act.
'

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos


IN THIS SECTION
Sec 1: Short Title
Sec 2: Findings/Purpose
Sec 3: Definitions
Sec 101: Create Office
Sec 102: Monetary AC
Sec 103: Medical AC
Sec 104: Assistance
Sec 105: Physicians
Sec 106: Program
Sec 107: Administrator
Sec 111: Eligibility
Sec 112: No-Fault
Sec 113: Filing a Claim
Sec 114: Claim Awards
Sec 115: Evidence
Sec 121: Requirements
Sec 131: Amount
Sec 132: Monitoring
Sec 133: Payment
Sec 134: Collateral
Sec 201: Definitions
Sec 202: Authority
Sec 203: Subtiers
Sec 204: Assessment
Sec 210: Definition
Sec 211: Insurers
Sec 212: Duties
Sec 213: Powers
Sec 214: Personnel
Sec 215: Termination
Sec 216: Expenses
Sec 221: Injury Fund
Asbestos FAIR ACt of 2005: Sec 222; Management
Sec 223: Enforcement
Sec 224: Interest
Sec 301: Judicial Rules
Sec 302: Award Review
The FAIR Act: Sec 303: Asbestos Assessments
FAIR Act of 2005--Sec 304: Challenges
Sec 305: Constitutionality
Sec 401: False Info
Sec 1348: Fraud
Sec 402: Bankruptcy
Sec 403: Existing Claims
Sec 404: Insurance
Sec 405: Report
Sec 406: U.S. Liability
Sec 407: Construction
Sec 408: Safety Breach
Sec 409: Discrimination
Sec 501: ACP Prohibition
`Sec 221: Ban of ACP
Subtitle A: Provisions
Subtitle B: Ban of ACP


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Asbestos
Asbestos Help: More Information
News & Warnings
see also:

Sec 1: Short Title Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2005 | Asbestos Lawyers
Asbestos Lawyers: Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2005

Sec 1348: Fraud FAIR Act of 2005 - TITLE I - Asbestos Claims Resolution
HR 1360: FAIR Act of 2005

FAIR Act of 2005 FAIR Act of 2005: House Resolution 1360
House Resolution 1360; FAIR Act of 2005