HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE

The Respondents’ Claims

The respondents’ claims implicate these considerations to the same or greater degree than in Metro-North. Each respondent seeks damages for his emotional response to being told he has an increased likelihood of dying. Ibid. The extent of the distress the respondents suffered is not calculable with a precision sufficient to permit juries to award damages, for the distress is simply incremental from the fears already shared by the general population.

The respondents observe, with extensive support in the medical literature, that a person with asbestosis has a 10 percent chance of developing mesothelioma, and that 39 percent of smokers with asbestosis develop fatal lung cancer; that cohort, however, drops to 5 percent, at most, for nonsmokers with asbestosis. While these statistics might at first appear to provide the beginning of an argument for giving asbestosis sufferers recovery for fear, the average American male has a 44 percent chance of developing cancer during the course of his life, and his chance of dying from some form of cancer is more than 21 percent. See L. Ries et al., National Cancer Institute, SEER Cancer Statistics Rev., 1973–1999, Tables I–15, I–16 (2002), available at http://Seer.Cancer.gov/csr/1973_1949/ overview.pdf (as visited Feb. 10, 2003) (available in Clerk of Court’s case file). This literature also suggests that a person who smokes has more than a 50 percent chance of dying from a disease caused by tobacco use, see National Cancer Institute, Changes in Cigarette-Related Disease Risks & Their Implication for Prevention and Control, Smoking & Tobacco Control Monograph, No. 8, 1997, at xi, Table1, a risk that all but one of the respondents has incurred that is wholly separate from their exposure to asbestos.

Courtesy of Opinion of Justice Kennedy in Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Petitioner v. Freeman Ayers et al.
Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos
Real Stories


IN THIS SECTION
Justice Kennedy’s Opinion: Part I
Fear of cancer
Mesothelioma Patients
Compensation in Norfolk vs. Ayers
Justice Kennedy opinion
Justice Kennedy's Opinion: Part II
Justice Kennedy’s Opinion: Part II A
Applying FELA
Emotional Distress
The Majority Opinion
Fear of Cancer Not Compensable
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Ruling
Pennsylvania Law Applied In Other Jurisdictions
Common Law Analysis
Responsibility Under FELA
Justice Kennedy’s Opinion: Part II B
The Respondents’ Claims
The Asbestos Jury's Analysis
Fear Must Be “Genuine and Serious”
Justice Kennedy’s Opinion: Part III


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Mesothelioma Resource Center
Asbestos
Asbestos Exposure Dangers
Asbestos Help
News & Warnings
Official Documents
Norfolk v. Ayers

Mesothelioma Lawyer

Asbestos Lawyer

Mesothelioma Attorney

Asbestos Attorney

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

The Respondents’ Claims Justice Kennedy discusses Norfolk's claims
Norfolk v. Ayers: Review of the railroad's claims

Pennsylvania Law Applied In Other Jurisdictions Justice Kennedy analyzes Pennsylvania law in other jurisdictions
Norfolk v. Ayers: Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejects the Court's view

Justice Kennedy's Opinion Justice Kennedy concurs in part and dissents in part
Read Justice Kennedy's Opinion in the Norfolk v. Ayers case