The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Why Choose Us?   Results   Search

Drugs Avandia Research Center

Scientists Silenced

in this section: Firm's Press Release, 10.1.07 | Another FDA Warning? 10.24.07 | avandia drug warning | Study Reveals Risks, 6.6.07 | FDA Warning, 5.22.07 | Secret Avandia Vote | Veterans Affairs: Avandia | FDA Approval of Avandia | NEJM Study | Warning Letter, 2001 | Sales Plunge | NEJM Update, 6.5.07 | FDA Safety Information | FDA Warning, 6.6.07 | Scientists Silenced | Dallas Lawsuit | Patients Switch Meds | Avandia Prescriptions Fall | Updated Study, 7.12.07 | Avandia Panel, 7.25.07 | Second Black Box? | Senators Testify | Experts Cite Risks | Black Box Warning | 9.12.07 Study Analysis | Actos Study | Arkansas Lawsuit | Weakens Bones | JAMA Report, 12.7.07 | Avandia Diabetes Pills | Avandia Warning


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Scientists Silenced About the Dangers of Avandia--Attorney Resources

Read on for information about the dangerous side effects of Avandia; get attorney resources.

On June 6, 2007, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested that a black box warning be added to Avandia, a drug for those with Type 2 diabetes. The so-called "black box" is the agency's strictest warning to the public for drugs. Studies have found that Avandia increases the risk of heart failure and heart attacks in users.

On June 12, 2007, the New York Times published an editorial saying GlaxoSmithKline, maker of Avandia, "failed to vigorously pursue questions about cardiac safety and the Food and Drug Administration acquiesced in its feeble efforts."

The editorial goes on to say that both The FDA and Glaxo were guilty of either ignoring or silencing scientists who raised the alarm about the safety of Avandia.

An FDA safety officer reportedly told the Times that she was reprimanded and removed from her duties of assessing the safety of Avandia after she recommended that it receive a black box warning.

Most alarming, however, is that Glaxo was alerted as early as 1999 about the potential risks to taking Avandia. According to the Times, Dr. John Buse, then a junior academic, warned the drugmaker about the cardiac risks.

If you or a loved one has suffered cardiac complications after ingesting Avandia, you deserve the guidance of a knowledgeable drug attorney. Get a free case review by filling out the form below.

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

When did you start taking Avandia?
What cardiovascular problems did you experience with the drug?
What was the date you experienced cardiac complications?
Did you have any cardiovascular disease before taking Avandia?
Do you smoke?
How did you learn of Weitz & Luxenberg?
Contact Name
Email Address
Phone Number (optional)


see also:

FDA Warning, 5.22.07 FDA Alert on the Anti-Diabetes Drug Avandia: Risk of Heart Attack
Risks to taking the drug Avandia include heart attack and chest pain

Veterans Affairs: Avandia Veterans Affairs Severely Limits Use of GlaxoSmithKline's Avandia Drug
Veterans Affairs Limits Use of Glaxo's Avandia Due to Safety Concerns

News & Warnings Avandia Breaking News: Glaxo Warned in 2001 about Misleading Marketing
Bloomberg News: FDA Warned Glaxo about Avandia Marketing in 2001


Name Phone Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!   strictly confidential
Your Question

Click here
for a free case review



$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims

$25 million jury verdict — brake reliner

$5.8 million settlement — failure to perform timely C-Section

$30 million verdict — 7 former power-plant workers suffering from asbestos-related illnesses

$6 million settlement — pediatric malpractice case

$14 million consolidated verdict — 5 asbestos-related cancer suits: shipyards/powerhouses/construction

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$3.5 million — 2 asbestos exposure cases

$600,000 settlement — motor vehicle negligence resulting in serious injury

$44 million verdict — 5 asbestos cases, including $11.6 million awarded to widow of sheet metal worker who died of mesothelioma

$1.6 million settlement — suicide after premature hospital discharge

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$1.5 million settlement — construction worker fell off elevated train tracks

$750,000 settlement — defective construction equipment resulted in serious injury to worker



Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases, get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 20 years, we’ve collected more than $1.3 billion for plaintiffs.