The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Contact Us   Verdicts   Search

Drugs & Medical Devices Avandia Legal Options News & Warnings

Secret Avandia Vote

in this section: Avandia Diabetes Pills


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Secret FDA Avandia Vote Outrages Senator--Begs Questions on Procedure

October 31, 2007, New York, NY— A high-ranking Republican Senator has learned that an internal panel of government safety experts recently voted in a private meeting to keep Type 2 diabetes drug Avandia on the market by a sliver-thin margin of 8-7. Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa wants answers to why the Food and Drug Administration’s Drug Safety Oversight Board (DSOB) did not disclose this vote to the public, which took place on October 2, 2007, according to Reuters.

“This is yet another example of how patients are kept in the dark about how close a pharmaceutical comes to being withdrawn from the market,” said Arthur Luxenberg, partner of personal injury law firm Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. “Both the FDA and GlaxoSmithKline had an obligation to fully inform the public of Avandia’s heart risks. There are growing questions about who knew what and when.”

The public at large only learned of Avandia’s link to a significant increase in the risk of heart attack in June 2007, after the New England Journal of Medicine published that finding in a combined analysis of more than 40 studies.

Following that report, the FDA announced in June that the toughest so-called “black-box warning” label would be placed on Avandia for its link to heart failure. This move was overshadowed, however, by the discovery that FDA safety reviewers reportedly recommended taking that urgent step more than a year earlier. The FDA is currently weighing whether to add a separate warning label for heart attack, according to the Wall Street Journal. This label would hobble GlaxoSmithKline’s contention that Avandia is just as safe as its competitors. Its leading drug rival, Actos, does not have a warning for heart-attack risk.

If you or a loved one has suffered cardiac complications after ingesting Avandia, you deserve the guidance of a knowledgeable drug attorney. Get a free case review by filling out the form below.

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Contact Name
Email Address
Phone Number
When did you start taking Avandia?
Did you experience cardiovascular problems after taking Avandia?
What was the date you experienced cardiac complications?
Did you have any cardiovascular disease before taking Avandia?
Did you suffer a bone fracture after taking either Avandia or Actos?
Please provide detail about your bone fracture injury, including the date of the injury, how the fracture occured and what bone(s) were affected.
Additional information


see also:

Avandia Diabetes Pills Glaxo Failed to Disclose Studies Regarding Avandia Diabetes Pills
FDA wasn't told about safety reports on Avandia Pills--lawsuit info

Veterans Affairs: Avandia Veterans Affairs Severely Limits Use of GlaxoSmithKline's Avandia Drug
Veterans Affairs Limits Use of Glaxo's Avandia Due to Safety Concerns

News & Warnings Avandia News and Information | Weitz & Luxenberg
Bloomberg News: FDA Warned Glaxo about Avandia Marketing in 2001

Name
Phone
Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!    strictly confidential
Your Question
  • MESOTHELIOMA
    • Mesothelioma Treatment
    • Mesothelioma Symptoms
    • Lung Cancer
    • Help for Veterans
    • Asbestos Exposure
    • Your Legal Options
    • Mesothelioma Lawyer
    • Asbestos Cancer
  • DEFECTIVE MEDICINES AND DEVICES
      Actos
      DePuy Hip
      Fosamax
    • Accutane
    • Avandia
    • Depakote
    • Gadolinium
    • Hydroxycut
    • Paxil Birth Defects
    • Qui Tam
    • Reglan
    • Shoulder Pain Pumps
    • Topamax
    • Pelvic Mesh
    • Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella
    • Zimmer Durom
    • Zimmer NexGen-CR Flex Porous Femoral component
    • Zimmer LPS-Flex
    • Zoloft Birth Defects
  • ENTERTAINMENT LAW
    • Intellectual Property
    • Creative Rights
    • Royalties
    • Licensing Fees
    • Breach of Contract
    • Fraud
  • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
    • Arsenic
    • Benzene
    • Chromium
    • Dioxins
    • Gulf Oil Spill
    • Landfill Odors
    • Lead Poisoning
    • Mercury Poisoning
    • Pesticides
    • Petroleum Spills
    • PCB
    • Property Damage
    • Radium
    • TCE
    • Water Contamination
    • Vapor Intrusion
  • ACCIDENTS
    • Auto Accident
    • Car Accident
    • Elevator Accident
    • Truck Accident
    • Workplace Accident
    • Pedestrian Knock-down
    • Bicyclist Collision
    • Motorcycle Collision
    • Single-Car Collision
    • Toyota Recall
    • Two-Car Collision
    • Multi-Car Collision
  • PERSONAL INJURY
    • Aviation
    • Back Injury
    • Birth Defects
    • Burn Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Eye Injury
    • Life Insurance Law
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • Dog Bite
    • Stray Electricity
  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
    • New York Medical Malpractice
    • Anesthesia Complications
    • Birth Injury
    • Brachial Plexus Palsy
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Death
    • Erb’s Palsy
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Foreign Object
    • Hospital Error
    • Hydrocephalus
    • Informed Consent
    • Medication Error
    • Pain and Suffering
    • Paraplegia
    • Podiatric Malpractice
    • Quadriplegia
    • Surgical Error
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:


$423 million settlement
MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally
$16.5 million verdict
Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape
$1.4 million settlement
Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance
$1.5 million settlement
for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks
$6 million settlement
Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth
$53 million verdict
brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma
$13.5 million verdict
one of the very first Vioxx trial cases
$15 million settlement
man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care
$37 million verdict
2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs
$47 million verdict
boilermaker who died from mesothelioma
$2.6 million settlement
ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers
$75 million verdict
historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s
$8 million settlement
obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits
$64.65 million award
4 asbestos plaintiffs
$17.5 million
consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?
check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases,

get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 25 years, we’ve collected more than $7 billion for plaintiffs.

Copyright © 2012 Weitz & Luxenberg, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

Wi3 Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
HOME | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP | CONTACT US |NEWS CENTER | CAREERS