The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Why Choose Us?   Results   Search

Previous Investigations Other Litigations Celebrex Research Center News & Warnings

Label: 6/7/2002

in this section: Warfarin FAQ | Label: 1/9/2004 | Label: 6/7/2004 | Label: 6/7/2002 | Label: 12/23/1999 | NDA 020998: 10/18/2001 | NDA 020998: 12/23/1999


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

LABELING CHANGES FOR ARTHRITIS DRUG CELEBREX

The following in information on the FDA label change for the dangerous arthritis drug, Celebrex:

June 7, 2002


Summary:

The FDA has approved labeling changes for Celebrex (celecoxib) based on the results of the Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study (CLASS). CLASS was a prospective double-blind randomized safety trial that evaluated approximately 4000 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with Celebrex 400 mg twice a day (twice the highest approved dose of Celebrex to treat RA) compared to approximately 4000 patients treated with standard doses of ibuprofen or diclofenac (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.) The use of low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis (up to 325 mg/day) was permitted during the study.

FDA agreed with its Advisory Committee recommendations of February 7, 2001 that CLASS did not show a safety advantage in upper gastrointestinal (GI) events for Celebrex compared to either ibuprofen or diclofenac. Inclusion of patients on low-dose aspirin in the study was valuable for safety assessment of Celebrex in this important population of arthritis sufferers. However, the use of aspirin (a drug known to cause stomach ulcers and bleeding) may have obscured the ability to accurately compare the GI safety of Celebrex to other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The agency concluded that the drug labeling for Celebrex should continue to include the standard warning for doctors and their patients about risks associated with all NSAIDS, including risks of GI ulceration, bleeding and perforation. The labeling advises physicians prescribing and patients taking these drugs to be alert for ulceration and bleeding that can occur with or without warning.

The Agency also determined that valuable safety data from CLASS should be incorporated into the labeling. The overall safety of Celebrex at twice the highest approved dose for RA was similar to commonly used doses of ibuprofen and diclofenac. Despite the high dose used, the rates of hypertension, edema, and serious adverse events, including cardiovascular adverse events (such as heart attacks) were no higher in Celebrex treated patients compared to ibuprofen or diclofenac treated patients.

Patients taking low dose aspirin and Celebrex had a higher rate of upper GI events than those taking Celebrex alone.

The geriatric section of the labeling will include new information about the risk of serious GI and renal (kidney) effects in the elderly. Such findings have been reported with other NSAIDs as well, and it is known that the elderly are at higher risk of GI ulcers and bleeding.

Another observation reported in the labeling is that patients treated with Celebrex had fewer clinically relevant decreases in hemoglobin than patients taking ibuprofen or diclofenac.

Celebrex is manufactured by Pharmacia of Peapack, New Jersey. The drug was approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis in December l998.

For more detailed information about Celebrex, ask your health care provider or pharmacist.


Have you been hurt by Celebrex? We can help. Fill out the form below for a free case evaluation.

Weitz & Luxenberg is no longer accepting Celebrex cases.


see also:

Warfarin FAQ Celebrex Label Changes
Q&A summary of the Celebrex label changes - Read before you take

NDA 020998: 10/18/2001 Celebrex Medicine Labels October 18, 2001
Celebrex medicine labels from October 18, 2001

Labeling Celebrex Medication Labeling Information
Celebrex Medication Information on Past and Present Label Descriptions


Name Phone Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!   strictly confidential
Your Question

Click here
for a free case review



$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims

$25 million jury verdict — brake reliner

$5.8 million settlement — failure to perform timely C-Section

$30 million verdict — 7 former power-plant workers suffering from asbestos-related illnesses

$6 million settlement — pediatric malpractice case

$14 million consolidated verdict — 5 asbestos-related cancer suits: shipyards/powerhouses/construction

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$3.5 million — 2 asbestos exposure cases

$600,000 settlement — motor vehicle negligence resulting in serious injury

$44 million verdict — 5 asbestos cases, including $11.6 million awarded to widow of sheet metal worker who died of mesothelioma

$1.6 million settlement — suicide after premature hospital discharge

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$1.5 million settlement — construction worker fell off elevated train tracks

$750,000 settlement — defective construction equipment resulted in serious injury to worker



Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases, get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 20 years, we’ve collected more than $1.3 billion for plaintiffs.