HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE

When Did the Plaintiff Learn of the Injury?

13 Here, it is undisputed that Christiansen knew of the existence of his injury in 1995 when he retired and filed a Social Security disability claim for pain relating to his lungs. We must therefore consider at what point Christiansen knew or had reason to know that the injury was attributable to his employment.

Courtesy of Christiansen v. Union Pacific
Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos


Mesothelioma
Asbestos
Asbestos Help
News & Warnings
IN THIS SECTION
Parties in the Case
Review of the Facts in the Case
Plantiff's Asbestos Exposure
Union Pacific's Motion Denied
Issues and Standard of Review
Analysis
Union Pacific's Assertions
The Court's Considerations
FELA Defendants
Union Pacific's Contentions
Summary Judgment on the Limitations Period
Plaintiff Learns of his Injury
The Trial Court's Decision
The Plaintiff's Argument
Did the Plaintiff Diligently Pursue his Claim?
The Court's Opinion
The Court's Conclusons

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

The Trial Court's Decision Christiansen v. Union Pacific: The Trial Court's Decision
The Trial Court's Decision in Christensen v. Union Pacific

Union Pacific's Contentions Christiansen v. Union Pacific: Union Pacific's Contentions
Read about the legal standards for hazardous levels of asbestos

Christiansen v. Union Pacific Christiansen v. Union Pacific: Important Asbestos litigation decision
Read about the asbestos case of Christiansen v. Union Pacific