The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Contact Us   Verdicts   Search

Environmental Pollutants Other Contaminants Chromium VI Chromium Research Center

Chromium Amendment Proposals

in this section: Breaking News | Complete Toxicological Profile for Chromium | Toxicological Report | EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Chromium | Chromium Amendment Proposals | Earth Day | Chromium Information from the NIH | Hexavalent Chromium Hazard Recognition | Erin Brockovich | Official Documents | Glossary | Legal Information


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE RULE REDUCING TOXIC AIR EMISSIONS FROM CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING AND CHROMIUM ANODIZING TANKS

May 23, 2002

TODAY'S ACTION

  • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing amendments to its national emission standards for chromium emissions from hard and decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks. These emission standards were put into place to reduce air emissions of toxic air pollutants. The purpose of this amendment is to allow for new equipment and control techniques that have been developed since the promulgation of the standard.
  • Toxic air pollutants, or air toxics, are known to cause cancer and other serious health effects.
  • EPA will accept comment on the proposal for 60 days after publication of the proposed amendment in the Federal Register. After reviewing and carefully considering all comments, the Agency anticipates issuing the final rule in 2002.

BACKGROUND

  • EPA worked with major stakeholders, including representatives from the industry, in developing this proposal. This action implements a recommendation from the Common Sense Initiative (CSI)
  • Metal Finishing subcommittee. The CSI was established by former Administrator Browner to bring together a broad spectrum of stakeholders to advise, consult with and make recommendations on
  • matters pertaining to improving the nation’s pollution prevention and control programs. The CSI participants included independent experts selected from among the national and local environmental
  • interest groups, industry, State and local governments, and other stakeholders such as labor organizations, environmental justice organizations, and the Federal government.
  • The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, require EPA to regulate emissions of 188 listed toxic air pollutants. On July 16, 1992, EPA published a list of industrial source categories that emit one or more of these air toxics.
  • For listed categories of "major" sources (those that emit 10 tons/year or more of a listed pollutant or 25 tons/year or more of a combination of pollutants), the Clean Air Act requires EPA to develop standards that require the application of stringent air pollution reduction measures known as maximum achievable control technology.
  • EPA identified chromium electroplating as one of the industrial sources emitting one or more toxic air pollutants.
  • Hard chromium electroplating processes deposit a relatively thick layer of chromium directly onto a base metal (usually steel) to provide characteristics such as hardness, wear and corrosion resistance. In decorative chromium electroplating, a thinner layer of chromium is plated onto the base metal to provide a bright surface with wear and tarnish resistance. In the chromium anodizing process, an oxide layer is coated onto aluminum to provide corrosion resistance.
  • Chromium air emissions from electroplating and anodizing processes are suspected to cause cancer or other serious health effects in humans.
  • EPA issued national emission standards for chromium emissions from hard and decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks were issued in 1995.

BENEFITS AND COST

  • The proposed rule amendments will not result in any measurable change in emission reductions, but will provide owners and operators alternatives to existing requirements. The existing alternatives will still be available for those owners and operators that choose to use them. These changes will provide more flexibility to many affected small businesses.

WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED RULE AMENDMENTS

  • The proposed rule amendments include two changes which may apply to hard chromium electroplating facilities. The first would add new requirements that accommodate the use of fume suppressants (fume suppressants are compounds which are added to the electroplating solution to
  • reduce misting) for controlling chromium emissions from hard chromium electroplating tanks. The second would add an alternative standard to the existing limit for air emissions of chromium for hard chromium electroplating tanks equipped with enclosing hoods which completely cover the surface of the plating tank.
  • This action also proposes to change the definitions of chromium electroplating tank and chromium anodizing tank to include all ancillary equipment necessary to accomplish electroplating or anodizing. EPA is proposing this change to maintain reductions in chromium air emissions while preventing existing electroplaters and anodizers from unnecessary regulatory requirements.
  • This action also proposes to amend the monitoring requirements for composite mesh pads by expanding the acceptable pressure drop range. EPA is also proposing to make several editorial changes which either correct or clarify rule language. These editorial changes would not effect the
  • rule’s applicability or requirements.
  • The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the proposed rule are similar to those required for other EPA air toxics regulations.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

  • To download a copy of the proposed rule, go to EPA’s World Wide Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/.
  • For further information about the proposed rule amendments, contact Mr. Phil Mulrine of EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards at(919) 541-5289 or mulrine.phil@epa.gov.
  • Send any comments on the proposed rulemaking (in duplicate if possible) to: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center (6102), Attention: Docket No. A-88-02, Room M-1500, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460. You may also
  • submit comments and data by electronic mail (e-mail) to: A-and-R-Docket@epamail.epa.gov.

For additional information about our chromium lawyers and a complimentary consultation, speak to a Client Relations representative at Weitz & Luxenberg today! Please fill out this simple form, call toll free 1 (800) 476-6070 or e-mail us at Clientrelations@weitzlux.com

.
see also:

EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Chromium EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Chromium
Ambient water quality criteria for Chromium - Environmental Protection

Chromium Amendment Proposals Chromium Amendmant Proposals
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE RULE REDUCING TOXIC AIR EMISSIONS FROM CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING AND CHROMIUM ANODIZING TANKS

News & Warnings Chromium News & Warnings: Hexavalent Chromium
Hexavalent Chromium water pollution & chromium land fill contamination News

Name
Phone
Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!    strictly confidential
Your Question
  • MESOTHELIOMA
    • Mesothelioma Treatment
    • Mesothelioma Symptoms
    • Lung Cancer
    • Help for Veterans
    • Asbestos Exposure
    • Your Legal Options
    • Mesothelioma Lawyer
    • Asbestos Cancer
  • DEFECTIVE MEDICINES AND DEVICES
      Actos
      DePuy Hip
      Fosamax
    • Accutane
    • Avandia
    • Depakote
    • Gadolinium
    • Hydroxycut
    • Paxil
    • Qui Tam
    • Reglan
    • Shoulder Pain Pumps
    • Topamax
    • Pelvic Mesh
    • Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella
    • Zimmer Durom
    • Zimmer NexGen-CR Flex Porous Femoral component
    • Zimmer LPS-Flex
    • Zoloft
  • ENTERTAINMENT LAW
    • Intellectual Property
    • Creative Rights
    • Royalties
    • Licensing Fees
    • Breach of Contract
    • Fraud
  • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
    • Arsenic
    • Benzene
    • Chromium
    • Dioxins
    • Gulf Oil Spill
    • Landfill Odors
    • Lead Poisoning
    • Mercury Poisoning
    • Pesticides
    • Petroleum Spills
    • PCB
    • Property Damage
    • Radium
    • TCE
    • Water Contamination
    • Vapor Intrusion
  • ACCIDENTS
    • Auto Accident
    • Car Accident
    • Elevator Accident
    • Truck Accident
    • Workplace Accident
    • Pedestrian Knock-down
    • Bicyclist Collision
    • Motorcycle Collision
    • Single-Car Collision
    • Toyota Recall
    • Two-Car Collision
    • Multi-Car Collision
  • PERSONAL INJURY
    • Aviation
    • Back Injury
    • Birth Defects
    • Burn Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Eye Injury
    • Life Insurance Law
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • Dog Bite
    • Stray Electricity
  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
    • New York Medical Malpractice
    • Anesthesia Complications
    • Birth Injury
    • Brachial Plexus Palsy
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Death
    • Erb’s Palsy
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Foreign Object
    • Hospital Error
    • Hydrocephalus
    • Informed Consent
    • Medication Error
    • Pain and Suffering
    • Paraplegia
    • Podiatric Malpractice
    • Quadriplegia
    • Surgical Error
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:


$423 million settlement
MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally
$16.5 million verdict
Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape
$1.4 million settlement
Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance
$1.5 million settlement
for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks
$6 million settlement
Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth
$53 million verdict
brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma
$13.5 million verdict
one of the very first Vioxx trial cases
$15 million settlement
man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care
$37 million verdict
2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs
$47 million verdict
boilermaker who died from mesothelioma
$2.6 million settlement
ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers
$75 million verdict
historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s
$8 million settlement
obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits
$64.65 million award
4 asbestos plaintiffs
$17.5 million
consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?
check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases,

get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 25 years, we’ve collected more than $7 billion for plaintiffs.

Copyright © 2012 Weitz & Luxenberg, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

Wi3 Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
HOME | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP | CONTACT US |NEWS CENTER | CAREERS