The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Contact Us   Verdicts   Search

Personal Injury Construction Research Center News & Warnings OSHA Guidelines

Electrical protective devices

in this section: General requirements | Eye and face protection | Respiratory Protection | Head protection | Occupational foot protection | Electrical protective devices | Hand Protection | further information | Hazard Assessment


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Occupational Safety and Health Standards: Personal Protective Equipment, Electrical protective devices.

If you are the victim of construction accidents, use this page to conduct research. To have your case evaluated immediately, please fill out our form. Read more about the Occupational Safety and Health Standards, 1910.137, Personal Protective Equipment, Electrical protective devices..

1910.137(a)

"Design requirements." Insulating blankets, matting, covers, line hose, gloves, and sleeves made of rubber shall meet the following requirements:

1910.137(a)(1)

"Manufacture and marking."

1910.137(a)(1)(i)

Blankets, gloves, and sleeves shall be produced by a seamless process.

1910.137(a)(1)(ii)

Each item shall be clearly marked as follows:

1910.137(a)(1)(ii)(A)

Class 0 equipment shall be marked Class 0.

1910.137(a)(1)(ii)(B)

Class 1 equipment shall be marked Class 1.

1910.137(a)(1)(ii)(C)

Class 2 equipment shall be marked Class 2.

1910.137(a)(1)(ii)(D)

Class 3 equipment shall be marked Class 3.

1910.137(a)(1)(ii)(E)

Class 4 equipment shall be marked Class 4.

..1910.137(a)(1)(ii)(F)

1910.137(a)(1)(ii)(F)

Non-ozone-resistant equipment other than matting shall be marked Type I.

1910.137(a)(1)(ii)(G)

Ozone-resistant equipment other than matting shall be marked Type II.

1910.137(a)(1)(ii)(H)

Other relevant markings, such as the manufacturer's identification and the size of the equipment, may also be provided.

1910.137(a)(1)(iii)

Markings shall be nonconducting and shall be applied in such a manner as not to impair the insulating qualities of the equipment.

1910.137(a)(1)(iv)

Markings on gloves shall be confined to the cuff portion of the glove.

1910.137(a)(2)

"Electrical requirements."

1910.137(a)(2)(i)

Equipment shall be capable of withstanding the a-c proof-test voltage specified in Table I-2 or the d-c proof-test voltage specified in Table I-3.

1910.137(a)(2)(i)(A)

The proof test shall reliably indicate that the equipment can withstand the voltage involved.

1910.137(a)(2)(i)(B)

The test voltage shall be applied continuously for 3 minutes for equipment other than matting and shall be applied continuously for 1 minute for matting.

..1910.137(a)(2)(i)(C)

1910.137(a)(2)(i)(C)

Gloves shall also be capable of withstanding the a-c proof-test voltage specified in Table I-2 after a 16-hour water soak. (See the note following paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(B) of this section.)

1910.137(a)(2)(ii)

When the a-c proof test is used on gloves, the 60-hertz proof-test current may not exceed the values specified in Table I-2 at any time during the test period.

1910.137(a)(2)(ii)(A)

If the a-c proof test is made at a frequency other than 60 hertz, the permissible proof-test current shall be computed from the direct ratio of the frequencies.

1910.137(a)(2)(ii)(B)

For the test, gloves (right side out) shall be filled with tap water and immersed in water to a depth that is in accordance with Table I-4. Water shall be added to or removed from the glove, as necessary, so that the water level is the same inside and outside the glove.

1910.137(a)(2)(ii)(C)

After the 16-hour water soak specified in paragraph (a)(2)(i)(C) of this section, the 60-hertz proof-test current may exceed the values given in Table I-2 by not more than 2 milliamperes.

1910.137(a)(2)(iii)

Equipment that has been subjected to a minimum breakdown voltage test may not be used for electrical protection. (See the note following paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(B) of this section.)

..1910.137(a)(2)(iv)

1910.137(a)(2)(iv)

Material used for Type II insulating equipment shall be capable of withstanding an ozone test, with no visible effects. The ozone test shall reliably indicate that the material will resist ozone exposure in actual use. Any visible signs of ozone deterioration of the material, such as checking, cracking, breaks, or pitting, is evidence of failure to meet the requirements for ozone-resistant material. (See the note following paragraph (a)(3)(ii)(B) of this section.)

1910.137(a)(3)

"Workmanship and finish."

1910.137(a)(3)(i)

Equipment shall be free of harmful physical irregularities that can be detected by the tests or inspections required under this section.

1910.137(a)(3)(ii)

Surface irregularities that may be present on all rubber goods because of imperfections on forms or molds or because of inherent difficulties in the manufacturing process and that may appear as indentations, protuberances, or imbedded foreign material are acceptable under the following conditions:

1910.137(a)(3)(ii)(A)

The indentation or protuberance blends into a smooth slope when the material is stretched.

1910.137(a)(3)(ii)(B)

Foreign material remains in place when the insulating material is folded and stretches with the insulating material surrounding it.

Note: Rubber insulating equipment meeting the following national consensus standards is deemed to be in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section:

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D 120-87, Specification for Rubber Insulating Gloves.

ASTM D 178-93 (or D 178-88), Specification for Rubber Insulating Matting.

ASTM D 1048-93 (or D 1048-88a), Specification for Rubber Insulating Blankets.

ASTM D 1049-93 (or D 1049-88), Specification for Rubber Insulating Covers.

ASTM D 1050-90, Specification for Rubber Insulating Line Hose.

ASTM D 1051-87, Specification for Rubber Insulating Sleeves.

These standards contain specifications for conducting the various tests required in paragraph (a) of this section. For example, the a-c and d-c proof tests, the breakdown test, the water soak procedure, and the ozone test mentioned in this paragraph are described in detail in the ASTM standards.

1910.137(b)

"In-service care and use."

1910.137(b)(1)

Electrical protective equipment shall be maintained in a safe, reliable condition.

1910.137(b)(2)

The following specific requirements apply to insulating blankets, covers, line hose, gloves, and sleeves made of rubber:

..1910.137(b)(2)(i)

1910.137(b)(2)(i)

Maximum use voltages shall conform to those listed in Table I-5.

1910.137(b)(2)(ii)

Insulating equipment shall be inspected for damage before each day's use and immediately following any incident that can reasonably be suspected of having caused damage. Insulating gloves shall be given an air test, along with the inspection.

1910.137(b)(2)(iii)

Insulating equipment with any of the following defects may not be used:

1910.137(b)(2)(iii)(A)

A hole, tear, puncture, or cut;

1910.137(b)(2)(iii)(B)

Ozone cutting or ozone checking (the cutting action produced by ozone on rubber under mechanical stress into a series of interlacing cracks);

1910.137(b)(2)(iii)(C)

An embedded foreign object;

1910.137(b)(2)(iii)(D)

Any of the following texture changes: swelling, softening, hardening, or becoming sticky or inelastic.

1910.137(b)(2)(iii)(E)

Any other defect that damages the insulating properties.

..1910.137(b)(2)(iv)

1910.137(b)(2)(iv)

Insulating equipment found to have other defects that might affect its insulating properties shall be removed from service and returned for testing under paragraphs (b)(2)(viii) and (b)(2)(ix) of this section.

1910.137(b)(2)(v)

Insulating equipment shall be cleaned as needed to remove foreign substances.

1910.137(b)(2)(vi)

Insulating equipment shall be stored in such a location and in such a manner as to protect it from light, temperature extremes, excessive humidity, ozone, and other injurious substances and conditions.

1910.137(b)(2)(vii)

Protector gloves shall be worn over insulating gloves, except as follows:

1910.137(b)(2)(vii)(A)

Protector gloves need not be used with Class 0 gloves, under limited-use conditions, where small equipment and parts manipulation necessitate unusually high finger dexterity.

Note: Extra care is needed in the visual examination of the glove and in the avoidance of handling sharp objects.

1910.137(b)(2)(vii)(B)

Any other class of glove may be used for similar work without protector gloves if the employer can demonstrate that the possibility of physical damage to the gloves is small and if the class of glove is one class higher than that required for the voltage involved. Insulating gloves that have been used without protector gloves may not be used at a higher voltage until they have been tested under the provisions of paragraphs (b)(2)(viii) and (b)(2)(ix) of this section.

..1910.137(b)(2)(viii)

1910.137(b)(2)(viii)

Electrical protective equipment shall be subjected to periodic electrical tests. Test voltages and the maximum intervals between tests shall be in accordance with Table I-5 and Table I-6.

1910.137(b)(2)(ix)

The test method used under paragraphs (b)(2)(viii) and (b)(2)(xi) of this section shall reliably indicate whether the insulating equipment can withstand the voltages involved.

Note: Standard electrical test methods considered as meeting this requirement are given in the following national consensus standards:

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D 120-87, Specification for Rubber Insulating Gloves.

ASTM D 1048-93, Specification for Rubber Insulating Blankets.

ASTM D 1049-93, Specification for Rubber Insulating Covers.

ASTM D 1050-90, Specification for Rubber Insulating Line Hose.

ASTM D 1051-87, Specification for Rubber Insulating Sleeves.

ASTM F 478-92, Specification for In-Service Care of Insulating Line Hose and Covers.

ASTM F 479-93, Specification for In-Service Care of Insulating Blankets.

ASTM F 496-93b, Specification for In-Service Care of Insulating Gloves and Sleeves.

1910.137(b)(2)(x)

Insulating equipment failing to pass inspections or electrical tests may not be used by employees, except as follows:

1910.137(b)(2)(x)(A)

Rubber insulating line hose may be used in shorter lengths with the defective portion cut off.

1910.137(b)(2)(x)(B)

Rubber insulating blankets may be repaired using a compatible patch that results in physical and electrical properties equal to those of the blanket.

1910.137(b)(2)(x)(C)

Rubber insulating blankets may be salvaged by severing the defective area from the undamaged portion of the blanket. The resulting undamaged area may not be smaller than 22 inches by 22 inches (560 mm by 560 mm) for Class 1, 2, 3, and 4 blankets.

..1910.137(b)(2)(x)(D)

1910.137(b)(2)(x)(D)

Rubber insulating gloves and sleeves with minor physical defects, such as small cuts, tears, or punctures, may be repaired by the application of a compatible patch. Also, rubber insulating gloves and sleeves with minor surface blemishes may be repaired with a compatible liquid compound. The patched area shall have electrical and physical properties equal to those of the surrounding material. Repairs to gloves are permitted only in the area between the wrist and the reinforced edge of the opening.

1910.137(b)(2)(xi)

Repaired insulating equipment shall be retested before it may be used by employees.

1910.137(b)(2)(xii)

The employer shall certify that equipment has been tested in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2)(viii), (b)(2)(ix), and (b)(2)(xi) of this section. The certification shall identify the equipment that passed the test and the date it was tested.

Note: Marking of equipment and entering the results of the tests and the dates of testing onto logs are two acceptable means of meeting this requirement.

Table I-2. - A-C Proof-Test Requirements

____________________________________________________________________

| |

| | Maximum proof-test current, mA (gloves only)

| |____________________________________________

| | | | |

| Proof-test | 267-mm | 356-mm | 406-mm | 457-mm

Class of | voltage | (10.5-in) | (14-in) | (16-in) | (18-in)

equipment| rms V | glove | glove | glove | glove

_________|____________|___________|_________|_________|____________

| | | |

0........| 5,000 | 8 | 12 | 14 | 16

1........| 10,000 | ......... | 14 | 16 | 18

2........| 20,000 | ......... | 16 | 18 | 20

3........| 30,000 | ......... | 18 | 20 | 22

4........| 40,000 | ......... | ....... | 22 | 24

______________________|___________|_________|_________|____________

Table I-3. - D-C Proof-Test Requirements

____________________________________________________________________

|

Class of equipment | Proof-test voltage

__________________________________|________________________________

|

0.................................| 20,000

1.................................| 40,000

2.................................| 50,000

3.................................| 60,000

4.................................| 70,000

__________________________________|________________________________

Note: The d-c voltages listed in this table are not appropriate for proof testing rubber insulating line hose or covers. For this equipment, d-c proof tests shall use a voltage high enough to indicate that the equipment can be safely used at the voltages listed in Table I-4. See ASTM D 1050-90 and ASTM D 1049-88 for further information on proof tests for rubber insulating line hose and covers.

Table I-4. - Glove Tests - Water Level(1)(2)

____________________________________________________________________

| |

| AC proof test | DC proof test

|____________________|__________________________

| | | |

Class of glove | mm. | in. | mm. | in.

___________________|___________|________|___________|______________

| | | |

0..................| 38 | 1.5 | 38 | 1.5

1..................| 38 | 1.5 | 51 | 2.0

2..................| 64 | 2.5 | 76 | 3.0

3..................| 89 | 3.5 | 102 | 4.0

4..................| 127 | 5.0 | 153 | 6.0

___________________|___________|________|___________|_____________

Footnote(1) The water level is given as the clearance from the cuff

of the glove to the water line, with a tolerance of + or - 13 mm. (+

or - 0.5 in.).

Footnote(2) If atmospheric conditions make the specified clearances

impractical, the clearances may be increased by a maximum of 25 mm.

(1 in.).

Table I-5. - Rubber Insulating Equipment Voltage Requirements

____________________________________________________________________

| | |

Class of | Maximum use | Retest voltage(2) | Retest voltage(2)

equipment | voltage(1) | a - c - rms | d - c - avg

| a - c - rms | |

_____________|_____________|___________________|__________________

| | |

0............| 1,000 | 5,000 | 20,000

1............| 7,500 | 10,000 | 40,000

2............| 17,000 | 20,000 | 50,000

3............| 26,500 | 30,000 | 60,000

4............| 36,000 | 40,000 | 70,000

_____________|_____________|___________________|__________________

Footnote(1) The maximum use voltage is the a-c voltage (rms)

classification of the protective equipment that designates the

maximum nominal design voltage of the energized system that may be

safely worked. The nominal design voltage is equal to the

phase-to-phase voltage on multiphase circuits. However, the

phase-to-ground potential is considered to be the nominal design

voltage:

[1] If there is no multiphase exposure in a system area and if the voltage exposure is limited to the phase-to-ground potential, or

[2] If the electrical equipment and devices are insulated or isolated or both so that the multiphase exposure on a grounded wye circuit is removed.

Footnote(2) The proof-test voltage shall be applied continuously for at least 1 minute, but no more than 3 minutes.

Table I-6. - Rubber Insulating Equipment Test Intervals

___________________________________________________________________

|

Type of equipment | When to test

___________________________|______________________________________

|

Rubber insulating line hose| Upon indication that insulating value

| is suspect.

Rubber insulating covers | Upon indication that insulating value

| is suspect.

Rubber insulating blankets | Before first issue and every 12 months

| thereafter(1).

Rubber insulating gloves | Before first issue and every 6 months

| thereafter(1).

Rubber insulating sleeves | Before first issue and every 12 months

| thereafter(1).

___________________________|_______________________________________

Footnote(1) If the insulating equipment has been electrically

tested but not issued for service, it may not be placed into service

unless it has been electrically tested within the previous 12 months.

[59 FR 4435, Jan. 31, 1994; 59 FR 33658, June 30, 1994]

Act now! It is essential that you inquire about your case as soon as possible. Litigation may be the only way to receive the damages to which you may be entitled, such as medical and health care bills, lost or diminished wages, and financial compensation to family in the case of death. Your individual state's law may limit your time to bring a legal claim to protect your rights. You need to have your construction accidents claim evaluated immediately!

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Name
Email
Phone Number
Best time to call
City/State
Please describe the circumstances of the construction accident
Please describe your injury
How did you hear about Weitz & Luxenberg?
Additional comments
Are you experiencing health problems related to this work?


see also:

Hand Protection FREE construction accidents OSHA information: Hand Protection.
construction accidents info: Personal Protective Equipment, Hand Protection.

Electrical protective devices FREE construction accidents OSHA information: Electrical protective devices.
construction accidents info: Personal Protective Equipment, Electrical protective devices.

Authority for 1910 Subpart I FREE construction accidents OSHA information: Authority for 1910 Subpart I
construction accidents info: Personal Protective Equipment, Authority for 1910 Subpart I

Name
Phone
Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!    strictly confidential
Your Question
  • MESOTHELIOMA
    • Mesothelioma Treatment
    • Mesothelioma Symptoms
    • Lung Cancer
    • Help for Veterans
    • Asbestos Exposure
    • Your Legal Options
    • Mesothelioma Lawyer
    • Asbestos Cancer
  • DEFECTIVE MEDICINES AND DEVICES
      Actos
      DePuy Hip
      Fosamax
    • Accutane
    • Avandia
    • Depakote
    • Gadolinium
    • Hydroxycut
    • Paxil Birth Defects
    • Qui Tam
    • Reglan
    • Shoulder Pain Pumps
    • Topamax
    • Pelvic Mesh
    • Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella
    • Zimmer Durom
    • Zimmer NexGen-CR Flex Porous Femoral component
    • Zimmer LPS-Flex
    • Zoloft Birth Defects
  • ENTERTAINMENT LAW
    • Intellectual Property
    • Creative Rights
    • Royalties
    • Licensing Fees
    • Breach of Contract
    • Fraud
  • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
    • Arsenic
    • Benzene
    • Chromium
    • Dioxins
    • Gulf Oil Spill
    • Landfill Odors
    • Lead Poisoning
    • Mercury Poisoning
    • Pesticides
    • Petroleum Spills
    • PCB
    • Property Damage
    • Radium
    • TCE
    • Water Contamination
    • Vapor Intrusion
  • ACCIDENTS
    • Auto Accident
    • Car Accident
    • Elevator Accident
    • Truck Accident
    • Workplace Accident
    • Pedestrian Knock-down
    • Bicyclist Collision
    • Motorcycle Collision
    • Single-Car Collision
    • Toyota Recall
    • Two-Car Collision
    • Multi-Car Collision
  • PERSONAL INJURY
    • Aviation
    • Back Injury
    • Birth Defects
    • Burn Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Eye Injury
    • Life Insurance Law
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • Dog Bite
    • Stray Electricity
  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
    • New York Medical Malpractice
    • Anesthesia Complications
    • Birth Injury
    • Brachial Plexus Palsy
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Death
    • Erb’s Palsy
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Foreign Object
    • Hospital Error
    • Hydrocephalus
    • Informed Consent
    • Medication Error
    • Pain and Suffering
    • Paraplegia
    • Podiatric Malpractice
    • Quadriplegia
    • Surgical Error
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:


$423 million settlement
MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally
$16.5 million verdict
Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape
$1.4 million settlement
Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance
$1.5 million settlement
for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks
$6 million settlement
Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth
$53 million verdict
brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma
$13.5 million verdict
one of the very first Vioxx trial cases
$15 million settlement
man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care
$37 million verdict
2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs
$47 million verdict
boilermaker who died from mesothelioma
$2.6 million settlement
ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers
$75 million verdict
historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s
$8 million settlement
obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits
$64.65 million award
4 asbestos plaintiffs
$17.5 million
consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?
check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases,

get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 25 years, we’ve collected more than $7 billion for plaintiffs.

Copyright © 2012 Weitz & Luxenberg, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

Wi3 Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
HOME | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP | CONTACT US |NEWS CENTER | CAREERS