The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Contact Us   Verdicts   Search

Personal Injury Construction Research Center News & Warnings OSHA Guidelines Authority for 1910 Subpart Z

Pulmonary function

in this section: Air sampling - cotton dust | Respiratory questionnaire | Respiratory questionnaire | Abbreviated questionnaire | Spirometry prediction | Pulmonary function | Vertical elutriator


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Occupational Safety and Health Standards: Toxic and Hazardous Substances, Pulmonary function standards for cotton dust standard

If you are the victim of construction accidents, use this page to conduct research. To have your case evaluated immediately, please fill out our form. Read more about the Occupational Safety and Health Standards, 1910.1043 App D, Toxic and Hazardous Substances, Pulmonary function standards for cotton dust standard.

The spirometric measurements of pulmonary function shall conform to the following minimum standards, and these standards are not intended to preclude additional testing or alternate methods which can be determined to be superior.

I. APPARATUS

a. The instrument shall be accurate to within + or - 50 milliliters or within + or - 3 percent of reading, whichever is greater.

b. The instrument should be capable of measuring vital capacity from 0 to 7 liters BTPS.

c. The instrument shall have a low inertia and offer low resistance to airflow such that the resistance to airflow at 12 liters per second must be less than 1.5 cm H2O/(liter/sec).

d. The zero time point for the purpose of timing the FEV(1) shall be determined by extrapolating the steepest portion of the volume time curve back to the maximal inspiration volume (1, 2, 3, 4) or by an equivalent method.

e. Instruments incorporating measurements of airflow to determine volume shall conform to the same volume accuracy stated in (a) of this section when presented with flow rates from at least 0 to 12 liters per second.

f. The instrument or user of the instrument must have a means of correcting volumes to body temperature saturated with water vapor (BTPS) under conditions of varying ambient spirometer temperatures and barometric pressures.

g. The instrument used shall provide a tracing or display of either flow versus volume or volume versus time during the entire forced expiration. A tracing or display is necessary to determine whether the patient has performed the test properly. The tracing must be stored and available for recall and must be of sufficient size that hand measurements may be made within requirement of paragraph (a) of this section. If a paper record is made it must have a paper speed of at least 2 cm/sec and a volume sensitivity of at least 10.0 mm of chart per liter of volume.

h. The instrument shall be capable of accumulating volume for a minimum of 10 seconds and shall not stop accumulating volume before (1) the volume change for a 0.5 second interval is less than 25 milliliters, or (2) the flow is less than 50 milliliters per second for a 0.5 second interval.

i. The forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1).(0) measurements shall comply with the accuracy requirements stated in paragraph (a) of this section. That is, they should be accurately measured to within + or - 50 ml or within + or - 3 percent of reading, whichever is greater.

j. The instrument must be capable of being calibrated in the field with respect to the FEV(1) and FVC. This calibration of the FEV(1) and FVC may be either directly or indirectly through volume and time base measurements. The volume calibration source should provide a volume displacement of at least 2 liters and should be accurate to within + or - 30 milliliters.

II. TECHNIQUE FOR MEASUREMENT OF FORCED VITAL CAPACITY MANEUVER

a. Use of a nose clip is recommended but not required. The procedures shall be explained in simple terms to the patient who shall be instructed to loosen any tight clothing and stand in front of the apparatus. The subject may sit, but care should be taken on repeat testing that the same position be used and, if possible, the same spirometer. Particular attention shall be given to insure that the chin is slightly elevated with the neck slightly extended. The patient shall be instructed to make a full inspiration from a normal breathing pattern and then blow into the apparatus, without interruption, as hard, fast, and completely as possible. At least three forced expirations shall be carried out. During the maneuvers, the patient shall be observed for compliance with instruction. The expirations shall be checked visually for reproducibility from flow-volume or volume-time tracings or displays.

The following efforts shall be judged unacceptable when the patient:

1. Has not reached full inspiration preceding the forced expiration,

2. Has not used maximal effort during the entire forced expiration,

3. Has not continued the expiration for at least 5 seconds or until an obvious plateau in the volume time curve has occurred,

4. Has coughed or closed his glottis,

5. Has an obstructed mouthpiece or a leak around the mouthpiece (obstruction due to tongue being placed in front of mouthpiece, false teeth falling in front of mouthpiece, etc.)

6. Has an unsatisfactory start of expiration, one characterized by excessive hesitation (or false starts), and therefore not allowing back extrapolation of time 0 (extrapolated volume on the volume time tracing must be less than 10 percent of the FVC.)

7. Has an excessive variability between the three acceptable curves. The variation between the two largest FVC's and FEV(1)'s of the three satisfactory tracings should not exceed 10 percent or + or - 100 milliliters, whichever is greater.

b. Periodic and routine recalibration of the instrument or method for recording FVC and FEV(1).(0) should be performed using a syringe or other volume source of at least 2 liters.

III. INTERPRETATION OF SPIROGRAM

a. The first step in evaluating a spirogram should be to determine whether or not the patient has performed the test properly or as described in II above. From the three satisfactory tracings, the forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1).(0)) shall be measured and recorded. The largest observed FVC and largest observed FEV(1) shall be used in the analysis regardless of the curve(s) on which they occur.

b. The following guidelines are recommended by NIOSH for the evaluation and management of workers exposed to cotton dust. It is important to note that employees who show reductions in FEV(1)/FVC ratio below .75 or drops in Monday FEV(1) of 5 percent or greater on their initial screening exam, should be re-evaluated within a month of the first exam. Those who show consistent decrease in lung function, as shown on the following table, should be managed as recommended.

IV. QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTERING THE TEST

Technicians who perform pulmonary function testing should have the basic knowledge required to produce meaningful results. Training consisting of approximately 16 hours of formal instruction should cover the following areas.

a. Basic physiology of the forced vital capacity maneuver and the determinants of airflow limitation with emphasis on the relation to reproducibility of results.

b. Instrumentation requirements including calibration procedures, sources of error and their correction.

c. Performance of the testing including subject coaching, recognition of improperly performed maneuvers and corrective actions.

d. Data quality with emphasis on reproducibility.

e. Actual use of the equipment under supervised conditions.

f. Measurement of tracings and calculations of results.

Act now! It is essential that you inquire about your case as soon as possible. Litigation may be the only way to receive the damages to which you may be entitled, such as medical and health care bills, lost or diminished wages, and financial compensation to family in the case of death. Your individual state's law may limit your time to bring a legal claim to protect your rights. You need to have your construction accidents claim evaluated immediately!


Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Name
Email
Phone Number
Best time to call
City/State
Please describe the circumstances of the construction accident
Please describe your injury
How did you hear about Weitz & Luxenberg?
Additional comments
Are you experiencing health problems related to this work?



see also:

Spirometry prediction FREE construction accidents OSHA information: Spirometry prediction tables for normal males and females
construction accidents info: Toxic and Hazardous Substances, Spirometry prediction tables for normal males and females

Pulmonary function FREE construction accidents OSHA information: Pulmonary function standards for cotton dust standard
construction accidents info: Toxic and Hazardous Substances, Pulmonary function standards for cotton dust standard

Cotton dust FREE construction accidents OSHA information: Cotton dust.
construction accidents info: Toxic and Hazardous Substances, Cotton dust.

Name
Phone
Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!    strictly confidential
Your Question
  • MESOTHELIOMA
    • Mesothelioma Treatment
    • Mesothelioma Symptoms
    • Lung Cancer
    • Help for Veterans
    • Asbestos Exposure
    • Your Legal Options
    • Mesothelioma Lawyer
    • Asbestos Cancer
  • DEFECTIVE MEDICINES AND DEVICES
      Actos
      DePuy Hip
      Fosamax
    • Accutane
    • Avandia
    • Depakote
    • Gadolinium
    • Hydroxycut
    • Paxil Birth Defects
    • Qui Tam
    • Reglan
    • Shoulder Pain Pumps
    • Topamax
    • Pelvic Mesh
    • Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella
    • Zimmer Durom
    • Zimmer NexGen-CR Flex Porous Femoral component
    • Zimmer LPS-Flex
    • Zoloft Birth Defects
  • ENTERTAINMENT LAW
    • Intellectual Property
    • Creative Rights
    • Royalties
    • Licensing Fees
    • Breach of Contract
    • Fraud
  • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
    • Arsenic
    • Benzene
    • Chromium
    • Dioxins
    • Gulf Oil Spill
    • Landfill Odors
    • Lead Poisoning
    • Mercury Poisoning
    • Pesticides
    • Petroleum Spills
    • PCB
    • Property Damage
    • Radium
    • TCE
    • Water Contamination
    • Vapor Intrusion
  • ACCIDENTS
    • Auto Accident
    • Car Accident
    • Elevator Accident
    • Truck Accident
    • Workplace Accident
    • Pedestrian Knock-down
    • Bicyclist Collision
    • Motorcycle Collision
    • Single-Car Collision
    • Toyota Recall
    • Two-Car Collision
    • Multi-Car Collision
  • PERSONAL INJURY
    • Aviation
    • Back Injury
    • Birth Defects
    • Burn Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Eye Injury
    • Life Insurance Law
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • Dog Bite
    • Stray Electricity
  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
    • New York Medical Malpractice
    • Anesthesia Complications
    • Birth Injury
    • Brachial Plexus Palsy
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Death
    • Erb’s Palsy
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Foreign Object
    • Hospital Error
    • Hydrocephalus
    • Informed Consent
    • Medication Error
    • Pain and Suffering
    • Paraplegia
    • Podiatric Malpractice
    • Quadriplegia
    • Surgical Error
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:


$423 million settlement
MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally
$16.5 million verdict
Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape
$1.4 million settlement
Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance
$1.5 million settlement
for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks
$6 million settlement
Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth
$53 million verdict
brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma
$13.5 million verdict
one of the very first Vioxx trial cases
$15 million settlement
man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care
$37 million verdict
2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs
$47 million verdict
boilermaker who died from mesothelioma
$2.6 million settlement
ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers
$75 million verdict
historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s
$8 million settlement
obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits
$64.65 million award
4 asbestos plaintiffs
$17.5 million
consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?
check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases,

get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 25 years, we’ve collected more than $7 billion for plaintiffs.

Copyright © 2012 Weitz & Luxenberg, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

Wi3 Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
HOME | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP | CONTACT US |NEWS CENTER | CAREERS