Top reasons for relying on our personal injury lawyers:
Named among the "Best Lawyers" by New York magazine
Numerous suits won, including $1.4 million in an accident case
No legal fees unless we win your case
Review of your potential suit for free when you complete the form below |
Construction law can be complicated. We provide this 2005 Construction Law "H.R. 2834" if you have been injured in a construction accident fill out this simple form for a free case review.
HR 2834 IH
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2834
To assure quality and best value with respect to Federal construction projects by prohibiting the practice known as bid shopping.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 9, 2005
Mr. KANJORSKI (for himself, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. WYNN, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. BISHOP of New York, and Mr. OWENS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform
A BILL
To assure quality and best value with respect to Federal construction projects by prohibiting the practice known as bid shopping.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Construction Quality Assurance Act of 2005'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Certain abhorrent and undesirable practices, known as bid shopping, have arisen from time to time in construction work for the Federal Government.
(2) Bid shopping threatens the integrity of the procurement of construction services.
(3) The practice of bid shopping deprives taxpayers of the full benefits of fair competition among contractors and subcontractors, and often results in poor quality of material and workmanship to the detriment of the public.
(4) When bid shopping occurs, the cost savings gained are not passed on to the Federal Government, but the simultaneous reductions in quality and value are passed on to the Federal Government.
(5) The procurement practices of the Federal Government should be modified to prohibit bid shopping at all levels.
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
(1) CONTRACT- The term `contract' means any contract with the Federal Government, exceeding $1,000,000 in amount, for the construction, alteration, or repair of any public building or public work of the United States.
(2) BID SHOPPING- The term `bid shopping' means the practice of divulging, or causing to be divulged, a contractor's or subcontractor's bid or proposal or requiring a contractor or subcontractor to divulge its bid or proposal to another prospective contractor or subcontractor before the award of a contract or subcontract in order to secure a lower bid or proposal.
(3) CONTRACTOR- The term `contractor' means an individual or entity that has been awarded or is seeking to be awarded a construction contract by the Federal Government.
(4) SUBCONTRACTOR- The term `subcontractor' means an individual or entity with which an offeror on a contract proposes to enter into a subcontract for manufacturing, supplying, fabricating, installing, or otherwise performing with respect to the contract, whether the work is to be performed by the subcontractor at the construction site or off the site.
SEC. 4. PROHIBITION AGAINST BID SHOPPING.
(a) Prohibition- Neither the Federal Government, nor a contractor or subcontractor, shall participate in the practice of bid shopping with respect to a contract.
(b) Notice Requirement- Any invitation for bid or request for proposal issued by the Federal Government shall include a clause explicitly prohibiting the practice of bid shopping and specifying the penalties for violating the prohibition against bid shopping.
SEC. 5. PENALTIES.
(a) In General- A contract shall provide for termination of the contract or the imposition of liquidated damages in the amount described in subsection (b) upon a determination by the contracting officer, in accordance with applicable provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (including provisions relating to due process), that a violation of section 4(a) has occurred.
(b) Amount- The amount of liquidated damages that may be imposed pursuant to subsection (a) is an amount equal to the greater of--
(1) the final bid on the contract (before the award of the contract) by either a contractor or subcontractor; or
(2) the price paid to the contractor or any subcontractor for work performed.
SEC. 6. IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH THE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION.
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be modified to provide appropriate solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and investigatory procedures to implement this Act.
SEC. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act shall apply with respect to contracts awarded on or after the date of the beginning of the first fiscal quarter beginning more than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
END
Click To Talk To Us Online ''
Construction Bill, NYC  News: Bill Would Tighten Construction Regulations in New York City
Bill to address shortcomings in regulation of construction in New York
Construction Law construction law of 2005-FREE legal information-H. R. 2834
H. R. 2834-construction law of 2005-free legal information
News & Warnings Construction site accident news, dangers, warnings and information
Construction Site Accident News, Dangers and Warnings Information |
