The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Contact Us   Verdicts   Search

Environmental Pollutants Other Contaminants Superfund Sites CA

Frontier Fertilizer

in this section: Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. (Mountain View Plant) | Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. (South San Jose Plant) | Fort Ord | Fresno Municipal Sanitary Landfill | Frontier Fertilizer

California Superfund Site: Frontier Fertilizer
Fight Air Pollution & Water Pollution With an Environmental Toxic Tort Lawsuit


Do you need a Toxic Tort Attorney in The Golden State? The EPA has designated Frontier Fertilizer in California as a Superfund site because of its amounts of environmental toxins and harm to the environment. You can read the report for the site below.

Some Superfund sites are on the National Priority Site Lists. The National Priorities List ("NPL") is the list of hazardous waste sites in the United States eligible for long-term remedial action financed under the federal Superfund program. Environmental Protection Agency regulations outline a formal process for assessing hazardous waste sites and placing them on the NPL. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation.

Sites are listed on the NPL upon completion of Hazard Ranking System (HRS) screening, public solicitation of comments about the proposed site, and after all comments have been addressed. EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines that no further response is required to protect human health or the environment. Sites where a remediation was completed through the Superfund program are typically deleted from the NPL.

Living near Superfund Sites in California may place you and your family more vulnerable to developing a disease from exposure to the site and experiencing a loss of value for your property, but you can do something to to fight back: The EPA says,

[We have] set up a "Post Construction Completion" (or PCC) strategy to ensure that Superfund response actions provide for the long-term protection of human health and the environment. EPA's Post Construction Completion activities also involve optimizing remedies to increase effectiveness and/or reduce cost without sacrificing long-term protection of human health and the environment.
However, most of the Superfund sites are still very dangerous to the health of local residents.

The lawyers of Weitz & Luxenberg, you benefit from the legal experience of accomplished Toxic Tort attorneys who will help fight back against polluters and win you and your community the financial compensation and remediation to which you are entitled.

Below you can read the EPA report for the Frontier Fertilizer Superfund site. If you, a loved one, or someone in your community has gotten sick due to exposure to a Superfund site Frontier Fertilizer, or if your property has lost value because of contamination, you are better off with a toxic tort attorney who knows the people of the State of California . Take your first step filling out this simple form. There is no obligation, and your case will be evaluated within one business day. To refer a friend, neighbor, or loved one, follow this link to let them know about the environmental toxic tort lawyers at Weitz & Luxenberg.




Frontier Fertilizer

This site is not a Federal Facility.

Updated: March 5, 2004

FRONTIER FERTILIZER
CALIFORNIA
EPA ID# CAD071530380


EPA Region 9
City: Davis
County: Yolo
Other Names:

Site Responsibility:

The site is being addressed through Federal and State actions.

NPL LISTING HISTORY

Proposed Date:01/18/1994

Final Date:05/31/1994

Deleted Date:


The principal chemicals in groundwater and soil are three pesticides which were used a soil fumigants: ethylene dibromide (EDB), 1,2-dichloropropane (DCP), and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) as well as the solvent carbon tetrachloride.

Subsurface soil in the area of the former disposal basins is contaminated as well as groundwater in the S-1, S-2 and A-1 zones. The A-2 aquifer, which is the drinking water supply for the City of Davis, is not contaminated.

The California Department of Toxic Substances Control installed a small groundwater extraction and treatment system in early 1993. EPA installed a larger system in 1995. The system was upgraded in Fall 2000 and again in 2002. The groundwater extraction wells for the existing system are in the field immediately north of the site. EPA has also installed groundwater monitoring wells on-site, in the field immediately north of the site and in the Mace Ranch residential subdivision. EPA collects samples of water chemistry and measures water levels in these wells on a quarterly, semi-annual, or annual basis, depending on the location of the well.

EPA collected samples of groundwater and surface and subsurface soil to determine the nature and extent of contamination and reported the results in an April 1997 Remedial Investigation (RI) Report. The studies showed that soil contamination was confined to the waste disposal basins area, and that contaminated groundwater existed in the upper three water-bearing zones and had migrated off-site. A June 1999 Supplemental Remedial Investigation Report describes sampling results from newly installed groundwater monitoring wells in the Mace Ranch Park subdivision as well as soil gas sampling results. Soil gas samples were collected on top of the former waste disposal basins and every 50 feet from the pits to the Mace Ranch Park subdivision. Groundwater sampling data showed much higher levels of contamination on-site and immediately north of the site than existed in Mace Ranch Park. Soil gas concentrations were high on-site and decreased rapidly north of the site.

A Baseline Risk Assessment was produced in April 1999. An indoor air risk assessment for the residents of Mace Ranch was included in the Baseline Risk Assessment. The indoor air risk assessment determined that there is no risk to residents of Mace Ranch from volatile chemicals in groundwater moving up through soil and into homes.

In Fall/Winter 2001 and Spring 2002, EPA collected additional groundwater samples in the Mace Ranch subdivision and collected soil, soil gas and groundwater samples on-site and in the field immediately north of the site to better define the geology and extent of groundwater contamination. A groundwater extraction well cluster was installed at the intersection of Caricia Drive and Arroyo Avenue and in the field immediately north of the former waste pits. A new groundwater monitoring well cluster was installed on Fifth Street near Entrada.

The groundwater sampling results showed elevated concentrations in the S-1 and S-2 zones on-site and immediately north of the site. These concentrations generally decrease sharply within a few hundred feet of the former disposal basins, although there is a localized area of elevated pesticide concentrations in the S-2 zone near the intersection of Caricia and Arroyo in Mace Ranch Park. Soil gas concentrations were lower than those collected in 1997, indicating that the risk calculations performed for the 1999 Baseline Risk Assessment remain protective. Soil sampling identified a zone of soil contamination extending from near the ground surface down to about 30 feet below ground surface in the area next to the former disposal basins. Soil samples collected about 60 feet north of the disposal basins show contamination about 30 to 80 feet deep, although at much lower concentrations than the shallow soil contamination near the former disposal basins. The results of this field work are described in Supplement No. 2 to the Remedial Investigation Report, dated January 2003.

As described above, EPA has been operating a groundwater extraction and treatment system since 1995. While the system has been effective in removing contaminants from groundwater in the field north of the site, quarterly groundwater monitoring data shows that the system is not capturing all of the plume (the area of contaminated groundwater) in the Mace Ranch subdivision. Therefore, EPA is in the process of expanding the groundwater extraction and treatment system. The first steps were the installation of the groundwater extraction wells and the additional site characterization performed in Fall/Winter 2001 and Spring 2002. EPA is using all of the groundwater data (as well as historical data) to help produce a Site Conceptual Model (SCM). The SCM will help determine the optimal locations for additional groundwater extraction wells. EPA expects to construct the first phase of the expansion to the extraction and treatment system in Summer 2003.

EPA will evaluate cleanup options for the waste dispoal basins area (the source area) and the A-1 aquifer in a Feasibility Study and then holding a public hearing on the preferred cleanup alternatives. EPA expects to finalize the Feasibility Study and hold a public hearing in Summer 2004.

The public information repositories for the site are at the following locations:

Yolo County Library,
315 East Fourteenth St.,
Davis, CA 95616

University of California, Shields Library Government Documents Department,
Davis, CA 95616

The most complete collection of documents is the official EPA site file, maintained at the following location:

Superfund Records Center
Mail Stop SFD-7C
95 Hawthorne Street, Room 403
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 536-2000

Enter main lobby of 75 Hawthorne street, go to 4th floor of South Wing Annex.

EPA SITE MANAGER:

Bonnie Arthur/R9/USEPA/US, Janet Rosati

ADDRESS:

75 Hawthorne Street
SanFrancisco, CA 94105

PHONE NUMBER:

B. Arthur (415) 972-3030, J. Rosati (415) 972-3165

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

Arthur.Bonnie@epa.gov
Rosati.Janet@epa.gov


EPA COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT COORDINATOR:

Don Hodge

ADDRESS:

75 Hawthorne Street (SFD-3), San Francisco, CA 94105

PHONE NUMBER:

1-800-231-3075

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

Hodge.Don@epa.gov


PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTER:

(415) 947-8701

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

r9.info@epamail.epa.gov


STATE CONTACT:

Steve Ross

ADDRESS:

8800 Cal Center Drive
Sacramento, CA 95826

PHONE NUMBER:

(916) 255-3696

PRP CONTACT:

ADDRESS:

PHONE NUMBER:

COMMUNITY CONTACT:

Pam Nieberg, President

ADDRESS:

Frontier Fertilizer Superfund Oversight Group

PHONE NUMBER:

(530) 756-6856

State Environmental Protection Agency

US Environmental Protection Agency

(800) 852-7550

(800) 424-8802

STATE:

CA

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT:

04

EPA ORGANIZATION:

SFD-8-2


• Site Description and History


•  Maps
•  Images


•  Description
•  Environmental Data


•  Response Action Status

EPA SITE MANAGER:

ADDRESS:

PHONE NUMBER:

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

EPA COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT COORDINATOR:

ADDRESS:

PHONE NUMBER:

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTER:

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

STATE CONTACT:

ADDRESS:

PHONE NUMBER:

PRP CONTACT:

ADDRESS:

PHONE NUMBER:

COMMUNITY CONTACT:

ADDRESS:

PHONE NUMBER:

STATE:

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT:

EPA ORGANIZATION:

source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency




Act Now! It is essential that you inquire about your pollutant lawsuit as soon as possible. California law may limit your time to bring a legal claim to protect your rights. Your legal review is free and there is no commitment. You case will be evaluated immediately, so get started on your claim today!

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Name
Email
Phone Number
City, State
What kind of pollution are you exposed to?
Please list any medical conditions you feel may have been caused by exposure to toxins:
Has anyone else in your community had similar experiences with pollutants as a result of living on or near a Superfund Site?
Has your property been devalued because of pollution? yes
no
Additional comments/questions:


see also:

Fresno Municipal Sanitary Landfill Environmental Pollution in California- Site: Fresno Municipal Sanitary Landfill
Fresno Municipal Sanitary Landfill Superfund Site Info - Fight Air Pollution, Water Pollution

Fort Ord Environmental Pollution in California- Site: Fort Ord
Fort Ord Superfund Site Info - Fight Air Pollution, Water Pollution

Fa - Fz California Superfund Sites: Fa - Fz
California Superfund Site Info - Fight Air Pollution, Water Pollution

Name
Phone
Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!    strictly confidential
Your Question
  • MESOTHELIOMA
    • Mesothelioma Treatment
    • Mesothelioma Symptoms
    • Lung Cancer
    • Help for Veterans
    • Asbestos Exposure
    • Your Legal Options
    • Mesothelioma Lawyer
    • Asbestos Cancer
  • DEFECTIVE MEDICINES AND DEVICES
      Actos
      DePuy Hip
      Fosamax
    • Accutane
    • Avandia
    • Depakote
    • Gadolinium
    • Hydroxycut
    • Paxil Birth Defects
    • Qui Tam
    • Reglan
    • Shoulder Pain Pumps
    • Topamax
    • Pelvic Mesh
    • Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella
    • Zimmer Durom
    • Zimmer NexGen-CR Flex Porous Femoral component
    • Zimmer LPS-Flex
    • Zoloft Birth Defects
  • ENTERTAINMENT LAW
    • Intellectual Property
    • Creative Rights
    • Royalties
    • Licensing Fees
    • Breach of Contract
    • Fraud
  • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
    • Arsenic
    • Benzene
    • Chromium
    • Dioxins
    • Gulf Oil Spill
    • Landfill Odors
    • Lead Poisoning
    • Mercury Poisoning
    • Pesticides
    • Petroleum Spills
    • PCB
    • Property Damage
    • Radium
    • TCE
    • Water Contamination
    • Vapor Intrusion
  • ACCIDENTS
    • Auto Accident
    • Car Accident
    • Elevator Accident
    • Truck Accident
    • Workplace Accident
    • Pedestrian Knock-down
    • Bicyclist Collision
    • Motorcycle Collision
    • Single-Car Collision
    • Toyota Recall
    • Two-Car Collision
    • Multi-Car Collision
  • PERSONAL INJURY
    • Aviation
    • Back Injury
    • Birth Defects
    • Burn Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Eye Injury
    • Life Insurance Law
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • Dog Bite
    • Stray Electricity
  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
    • New York Medical Malpractice
    • Anesthesia Complications
    • Birth Injury
    • Brachial Plexus Palsy
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Death
    • Erb’s Palsy
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Foreign Object
    • Hospital Error
    • Hydrocephalus
    • Informed Consent
    • Medication Error
    • Pain and Suffering
    • Paraplegia
    • Podiatric Malpractice
    • Quadriplegia
    • Surgical Error
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:


$423 million settlement
MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally
$16.5 million verdict
Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape
$1.4 million settlement
Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance
$1.5 million settlement
for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks
$6 million settlement
Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth
$53 million verdict
brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma
$13.5 million verdict
one of the very first Vioxx trial cases
$15 million settlement
man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care
$37 million verdict
2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs
$47 million verdict
boilermaker who died from mesothelioma
$2.6 million settlement
ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers
$75 million verdict
historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s
$8 million settlement
obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits
$64.65 million award
4 asbestos plaintiffs
$17.5 million
consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?
check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases,

get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 25 years, we’ve collected more than $7 billion for plaintiffs.

Copyright © 2012 Weitz & Luxenberg, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

Wi3 Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
HOME | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP | CONTACT US |NEWS CENTER | CAREERS