The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Contact Us   Verdicts   Search

Environmental Pollutants Other Contaminants Superfund Sites MA

Hatheway & Patterson

in this section: Hanscom Field/Hanscom Air Force Base | Hatheway & Patterson | Haverhill Municipal Landfill | Hocomonco Pond

Massachusetts Superfund Site: Hatheway & Patterson
Fight Air Pollution & Water Pollution With an Environmental Toxic Tort Lawsuit


Do you need a Toxic Tort Lawyer in The Bay State? The E.P.A. has designated Hatheway & Patterson in Massachusetts as a Superfund site because of its amounts of enviromental contamination and threat to the natural world. You can read the report for the site below.

Some Superfund sites are on the National Priority Site Lists. The National Priorities List ("NPL") is the list of hazardous waste sites in the United States eligible for long-term remedial action financed under the federal Superfund program. Environmental Protection Agency regulations outline a formal process for assessing hazardous waste sites and placing them on the NPL. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation.

Sites are listed on the NPL upon completion of Hazard Ranking System (HRS) screening, public solicitation of comments about the proposed site, and after all comments have been addressed. EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines that no further response is required to protect human health or the environment. Sites where a remediation was completed through the Superfund program are typically deleted from the NPL.

Living near Superfund Sites in Massachusetts may place you and the people you love at risk of getting sick from proximity to the site and experiencing a loss of value for your property, but there are steps you can take to fight back: The EPA says,

[We have] set up a "Post Construction Completion" (or PCC) strategy to ensure that Superfund response actions provide for the long-term protection of human health and the environment. EPA's Post Construction Completion activities also involve optimizing remedies to increase effectiveness and/or reduce cost without sacrificing long-term protection of human health and the environment.
However, most of the Superfund sites continue to pose a threat the health of those near-by.

By choosing Weitz & Luxenberg, you will get the legal experience of accomplished Toxic Tort attorneys who will help fight back against polluters and secure you and your loved ones the financial compensation and remediation to which you are entitled.

Below you can read the EPA report for the Hatheway & Patterson Superfund site. If you, a loved one, or someone in your community has suffered due to exposure to a Superfund site Hatheway & Patterson, or if your property has lost value because of pollution, you will need a toxic tort attorney who knows the people of the State of Massachusetts . Take your first step filling out this simple form. There is no obligation, and your case will be evaluated within 24 hours. To refer a friend, neighbor, or loved one, follow this link to let them know about the environmental toxic tort attorneys at Weitz & Luxenberg.




Hatheway & Patterson

This site is not a Federal Facility.

Site Type: Long Term/National Priorities List (NPL)


 HATHEWAY & PATTERSON


 Mansfield, Massachusetts

 Bristol County
 Street Address: 15 COUNTY ROAD
 Zip Code: 02048
 Congressional
 District(s):

04
 EPA ID #: MAD001060805
 Site ID #: 0102724
 Site Aliases: Hatheway & Patterson

 Street Address:

15 COUNTY ROAD

 Zip Code:

02048

 Congressional
 District(s):


04

 EPA ID #:

MAD001060805

 Site ID #:

0102724

 Site Aliases:

Hatheway & Patterson

 Site Responsibility:

Federal

 NPL LISTING HISTORY

 Proposed Date

09/13/2001

 Final Date

09/05/2002

Initial Action

Because wood treating solvents, chemicals, sludges, tanks, sumps, and drums were abandoned by HPC on the property with no electricity or heat, conditions at the site posed a significant threat of hazardous substance releases. Therefore, in December 1993, EPA's Emergency Planning and Response Branch initiated a two year removal action to address problems at the HPC site. Upon initiating the removal action, EPA discovered several process and support buildings that contained large tanks, process vessels, drums, sumps, pits, and various small containers. Outside on the property, EPA discovered three drip pads, treated lumber storage areas, three above ground tanks containing PCP, another tank containing fuel oil, three tanks containing Dricon(tm) in water, and six underground storage tanks. Over 50,000 gallons of waste water was removed by EPA during this action; an undetermined amount of contaminated soil remains at the site. HPC's operations and abandoned materials have caused releases of site-related contaminants to soils, ground water, and surface water.

Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study

Field work for the Remedial Investigation (RI) began in late October 2002 and ended in Fall 2003. The final RI and the Feasibility Study was released in June 2005.

Record of Decision

The Record of Decision was signed on September 30, 2005. The major components of the selected remedy are: (1) Approximately 31,000 cubic yards of soil exceeding cleanup levels will be excavated. (2) The buildings in and near Hatheway & Patterson’s former manufacturing area will be demolished to allow excavation of underlying contaminated soils. Excavated soil will be replaced with clean backfill. (3) Soils containing pentachlorophenol (PCP), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and arsenic will be excavated, tested for leachability and, if they fail, stabilization/solidification agent(s) will be utilized. The stabilized/solidified soils will then be consolidated on-site under a low-permeability cover. (4) Soils containing dioxin and oily material (LNAPL) will be disposed of off-site at a licensed facility. (5) Institutional controls will prohibit the use of Site groundwater and restrict land uses in a manner that ensures the protectiveness of the remedy as described in this ROD, and ensures the integrity of the on-site low-permeability cover and other remedial components. Risks from soil exposures within the area of the existing railroad right of way will be evaluated during design and appropriate action such as deed restrictions or other legal and administrative measures will be implemented if necessary. (6) Long term monitoring of groundwater, surface water, fish tissue and sediment. (6) Five-year reviews, and operation and maintenance of remedial components, including the low permeability cover

Disclaimer

Instructions about PDF


Recent Press Releases about this project (if any) nbsp


Proposed NPL Listing nbsp

Final NPL Listing nbsp


Administrative Record - Index Only - Record of Decision (ROD), September 2005 (584KB) nbsp


Preliminary Reuse Assessment, September 2003 (2,872 KB) nbsp

Interim Final Remedial Investigation Report, Volume I of II, April 2005 (70.5MB) nbsp

Interim Final Remedial Investigation Report, Volume II of II, April 2005 (25MB) nbsp

Interim Final Feasibility Study, June 2005 (6.9MB) nbsp

Proposed Plan, June 2005 (2.4MB) nbsp


View Records of Decision (RODS) on-line (EPA HQ) nbsp

Record of Decision, OU 1, September 30, 2005  nbsp


NPL Site Narrative at Listing: nbsp

NPL Site Narrative at Final Listing nbsp


[Back to Top

EPA Remedial Project Manager:

David Lederer

Address:

One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (HBO)
Boston, MA 02114-2023

Phone #:

(617) 918-1325

E-Mail Address:

lederer.david@epa.gov


EPA Community Involvement Coordinator:

Pamela Harting-Barrat

Address:

One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (HIO)
Boston, MA 02114-2023

Phone #:

(617) 918 - 1318

E-Mail Address:

harting-barrat.pamela@epa.gov




Operations at the HPC property included preserving wood sheeting, planking, timber, piling, poles, and other wood products. HPC began wood treating operations at the property in 1953, although it operated at the facility since 1927. Operations between 1927 and 1953 are unknown. HPC historically used various methods and materials to treat wood on the property, including PCP in fuel oil, creosote, fluoro-chrome-arsenate-phenol (FCAP) salts, chromated copper-arsenate (CCA), Dricon(tm) (a fire retardant), and other chemicals.

Threats and Contaminants

In 1971, a tar mat approximately 62 feet long and 6 inches wide was discovered by the town of Mansfield and Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) personnel. At the end of 1972, a citizen complained of "oily water" and dead water fowl in the Rumford River downstream of the HPC facility. Subsequently, MADEP and the town of Mansfield requested that HPC contain the seepage. By 1973, HPC developed a contaminated ground water recovery trench located along the east bank of the Rumford River just upstream from its confluence with the Rumford River backwash channel. Oily seepage was again detected in the Rumford River in 1981 by a prospective buyer of the site. In 1987, HPC was issued a Notice of Noncompliance by the MADEP, which ordered that HPC conduct a soils and hydrology assessment of the site. In 1988, MADEP issued HPC a Notice of Responsibility, and in 1990, MADEP issued a Request for Short-Term Measure to address the imminent contamination of the Rumford River emanating from the site. In 1992, EPA's RCRA program personnel conducted inspections of the HPC facility and determined that the drip pads were not in compliance. In 1993, HPC filed for bankruptcy and ceased operations in April 1993.


In 1999, the state of Massachusetts, at the recommendation of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, closed the Rumford River from below Glue Factory Pond dam to the Norton Reservoir to all fishing due to dioxin contamination attributed to HPC. Releases of dioxins and phenols also have impacted approximately 1.25 miles of wetland frontage along the Rumford River, and the releases pose a threat to several other wetland areas, fisheries, and habitats used by State designated threatened species downstream of the facility. In addition, over 44,000 people receive drinking water from private and municipal wells within four miles of the HPC facility.

Front Entrance to Hatheway & Patterson Company Site

Cleanup Approach


Response Action Status

Initial Action Because wood treating solvents, chemicals, sludges, tanks, sumps, and drums were abandoned by HPC on the property with no electricity or heat, conditions at the site posed a significant threat of hazardous substance releases. Therefore, in December 1993, EPA's Emergency Planning and Response Branch initiated a two year removal action to address problems at the HPC site. Upon initiating the removal action, EPA discovered several process and support buildings that contained large tanks, process vessels, drums, sumps, pits, and various small containers. Outside on the property, EPA discovered three drip pads, treated lumber storage areas, three above ground tanks containing PCP, another tank containing fuel oil, three tanks containing Dricon(tm) in water, and six underground storage tanks. Over 50,000 gallons of waste water was removed by EPA during this action; an undetermined amount of contaminated soil remains at the site. HPC's operations and abandoned materials have caused releases of site-related contaminants to soils, ground water, and surface water.
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Field work for the Remedial Investigation (RI) began in late October 2002 and ended in Fall 2003. The final RI and the Feasibility Study was released in June 2005.
Record of Decision The Record of Decision was signed on September 30, 2005. The major components of the selected remedy are: (1) Approximately 31,000 cubic yards of soil exceeding cleanup levels will be excavated. (2) The buildings in and near Hatheway & Patterson’s former manufacturing area will be demolished to allow excavation of underlying contaminated soils. Excavated soil will be replaced with clean backfill. (3) Soils containing pentachlorophenol (PCP), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and arsenic will be excavated, tested for leachability and, if they fail, stabilization/solidification agent(s) will be utilized. The stabilized/solidified soils will then be consolidated on-site under a low-permeability cover. (4) Soils containing dioxin and oily material (LNAPL) will be disposed of off-site at a licensed facility. (5) Institutional controls will prohibit the use of Site groundwater and restrict land uses in a manner that ensures the protectiveness of the remedy as described in this ROD, and ensures the integrity of the on-site low-permeability cover and other remedial components. Risks from soil exposures within the area of the existing railroad right of way will be evaluated during design and appropriate action such as deed restrictions or other legal and administrative measures will be implemented if necessary. (6) Long term monitoring of groundwater, surface water, fish tissue and sediment. (6) Five-year reviews, and operation and maintenance of remedial components, including the low permeability cover
Environmental Progress

EPA conducted a preliminary environmental investigation in the Fall of 2001 and issued a Final Data Report on June 4, 2002. The preliminary environmental investigation focused on sampling existing ground water monitoring wells at the site and collecting water and sediment samples from the Rumford River. The Final Data Report summarizes all historical soil data collected at the site as well as data collected during the preliminary environmental investigation. Based on the information presented in the Final Data Report, EPA was able to identify where additional information is needed to complete a Remedial Investigation.

Current Site Status

A Remedial Investigation of the Hatheway & Patterson site was completed in the Spring of 2005.

A Proposed Plan for cleanup of the Site was released in June 2005. The public information meeting was held on June 16, 2005 at the Mansfield Town Hall at 7pm and the Public Hearing on the proposal was held on July 7, 2005 at the Mansfield Town Hall at 7pm. The public comment period on the proposal wasopen from June 17th to July 18, 2005.

The Record of Decision was signed on September 30, 2005. The major components of the selected remedy are:

Approximately 31,000 cubic yards of soil exceeding cleanup levels will be excavated.
The buildings in and near Hatheway & Patterson’s former manufacturing area will be demolished to allow excavation of underlying contaminated soils. Excavated soil will be replaced with clean backfill.
Soils containing pentachlorophenol (PCP), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and arsenic will be excavated, tested for leachability and, if they fail, stabilization/solidification agent(s) will be utilized. The stabilized/solidified soils will then be consolidated on-site under a low-permeability cover.
Soils containing dioxin and oily material (LNAPL) will be disposed of off-site at a licensed facility.
Institutional controls will prohibit the use of Site groundwater and restrict land uses in a manner that ensures the protectiveness of the remedy as
described in this ROD, and ensures the integrity of the on-site low-permeability cover and other remedial components. Risks from soil exposures within the area of the existing railroad right of way will be evaluated during design and appropriate action such as deed restrictions or other legal and administrative measures will be implemented if necessary.
Long term monitoring of groundwater, surface water, fish tissue and sediment.
Five-year reviews, and operation and maintenance of remedial components, including the low permeability cover

The Remedial Design will commence in 2005 and be complete in 2006. EPA hopes to begin demolition of the remaining Hatheway & Patterson production facilities during 2006.

Site Photos


Links to Other Site Information
DisclaimerInstructions about PDF

Newsletters & Press Releases:
Recent Press Releases about this project (if any) nbsp

Federal Register Notices:
Proposed NPL Listing nbsp
Final NPL Listing nbsp

Administrative Records:
Administrative Record - Index Only - Record of Decision (ROD), September 2005 (584KB) nbsp

Reports and Studies:
Preliminary Reuse Assessment, September 2003 (2,872 KB) nbsp
Interim Final Remedial Investigation Report, Volume I of II, April 2005 (70.5MB) nbsp
Interim Final Remedial Investigation Report, Volume II of II, April 2005 (25MB) nbsp
Interim Final Feasibility Study, June 2005 (6.9MB) nbsp
Proposed Plan, June 2005 (2.4MB) nbsp

Decision Documents:
View Records of Decision (RODS) on-line (EPA HQ) nbsp
Record of Decision, OU 1, September 30, 2005  nbsp

Other Links:
NPL Site Narrative at Listing: nbsp
NPL Site Narrative at Final Listing nbsp

Site Repositories

Mansfield Public Library, 255 Hope Street, Mansfield, MA
EPA New England Records Center, One Congress Street, Boston, MA 02114 (617) 918-1440

[Back to Top

EPA Remedial Project Manager:David Lederer
Address:One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (HBO)
Boston, MA 02114-2023
Phone #: (617) 918-1325
E-Mail Address:lederer.david@epa.gov

EPA Community Involvement Coordinator: Pamela Harting-Barrat
Address: One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (HIO)
Boston, MA 02114-2023
Phone #:(617) 918 - 1318
E-Mail Address: harting-barrat.pamela@epa.gov

 



In 1999, the state of Massachusetts, at the recommendation of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, closed the Rumford River from below Glue Factory Pond dam to the Norton Reservoir to all fishing due to dioxin contamination attributed to HPC. Releases of dioxins and phenols also have impacted approximately 1.25 miles of wetland frontage along the Rumford River, and the releases pose a threat to several other wetland areas, fisheries, and habitats used by State designated threatened species downstream of the facility. In addition, over 44,000 people receive drinking water from private and municipal wells within four miles of the HPC facility.

Front Entrance to Hatheway & Patterson Company Site

 

source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency




Act Now! It is essential that you inquire about your pollutant lawsuit as soon as possible. Massachusetts law may limit your time to bring a legal claim to protect your rights. Your legal review is free and there is no commitment. You case will be evaluated immediately, so get started on your claim today!

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Name
Email
Phone Number
City, State
What kind of pollution are you exposed to?
Please list any medical conditions you feel may have been caused by exposure to toxins:
Has anyone else in your community had similar experiences with pollutants as a result of living on or near a Superfund Site?
Has your property been devalued because of pollution? yes
no
Additional comments/questions:


see also:

Hatheway & Patterson Environmental Pollution in Massachusetts- Site: Hatheway & Patterson
Hatheway & Patterson Superfund Site Info - Fight Air Pollution, Water Pollution

Hanscom Field/Hanscom Air Force Base Environmental Pollution in Massachusetts- Site: Hanscom Field/Hanscom Air Force Base
Hanscom Field/Hanscom Air Force Base Superfund Site Info - Fight Air Pollution, Water Pollution

Ha - Hz Massachusetts Superfund Sites: Ha - Hz
Massachusetts Superfund Site Info - Fight Air Pollution, Water Pollution

Name
Phone
Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!    strictly confidential
Your Question
  • MESOTHELIOMA
    • Mesothelioma Treatment
    • Mesothelioma Symptoms
    • Lung Cancer
    • Help for Veterans
    • Asbestos Exposure
    • Your Legal Options
    • Mesothelioma Lawyer
    • Asbestos Cancer
  • DEFECTIVE MEDICINES AND DEVICES
      Actos
      DePuy Hip
      Fosamax
    • Accutane
    • Avandia
    • Depakote
    • Gadolinium
    • Hydroxycut
    • Paxil Birth Defects
    • Qui Tam
    • Reglan
    • Shoulder Pain Pumps
    • Topamax
    • Pelvic Mesh
    • Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella
    • Zimmer Durom
    • Zimmer NexGen-CR Flex Porous Femoral component
    • Zimmer LPS-Flex
    • Zoloft Birth Defects
  • ENTERTAINMENT LAW
    • Intellectual Property
    • Creative Rights
    • Royalties
    • Licensing Fees
    • Breach of Contract
    • Fraud
  • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
    • Arsenic
    • Benzene
    • Chromium
    • Dioxins
    • Gulf Oil Spill
    • Landfill Odors
    • Lead Poisoning
    • Mercury Poisoning
    • Pesticides
    • Petroleum Spills
    • PCB
    • Property Damage
    • Radium
    • TCE
    • Water Contamination
    • Vapor Intrusion
  • ACCIDENTS
    • Auto Accident
    • Car Accident
    • Elevator Accident
    • Truck Accident
    • Workplace Accident
    • Pedestrian Knock-down
    • Bicyclist Collision
    • Motorcycle Collision
    • Single-Car Collision
    • Toyota Recall
    • Two-Car Collision
    • Multi-Car Collision
  • PERSONAL INJURY
    • Aviation
    • Back Injury
    • Birth Defects
    • Burn Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Eye Injury
    • Life Insurance Law
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • Dog Bite
    • Stray Electricity
  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
    • New York Medical Malpractice
    • Anesthesia Complications
    • Birth Injury
    • Brachial Plexus Palsy
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Death
    • Erb’s Palsy
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Foreign Object
    • Hospital Error
    • Hydrocephalus
    • Informed Consent
    • Medication Error
    • Pain and Suffering
    • Paraplegia
    • Podiatric Malpractice
    • Quadriplegia
    • Surgical Error
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:


$423 million settlement
MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally
$16.5 million verdict
Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape
$1.4 million settlement
Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance
$1.5 million settlement
for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks
$6 million settlement
Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth
$53 million verdict
brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma
$13.5 million verdict
one of the very first Vioxx trial cases
$15 million settlement
man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care
$37 million verdict
2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs
$47 million verdict
boilermaker who died from mesothelioma
$2.6 million settlement
ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers
$75 million verdict
historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s
$8 million settlement
obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits
$64.65 million award
4 asbestos plaintiffs
$17.5 million
consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?
check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases,

get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 25 years, we’ve collected more than $7 billion for plaintiffs.

Copyright © 2012 Weitz & Luxenberg, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

Wi3 Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
HOME | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP | CONTACT US |NEWS CENTER | CAREERS