The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Contact Us   Verdicts   Search

Environmental Pollutants Other Contaminants Superfund Sites OH

Feed Materials Production Center (Usdoe)

in this section: Feed Materials Production Center (Usdoe) | Fields Brook | Fultz Landfill

Ohio Superfund Site: Feed Materials Production Center (Usdoe)
Fight Air Pollution & Water Pollution With an Environmental Toxic Tort Lawsuit


Do you need a Toxic Tort Lawyer in The Buckeye State? The EPA has designated Feed Materials Production Center (Usdoe) in Ohio as a Superfund site because of its amounts of toxic pollution and danger to the natural world. You can read the report for the site below.

Some Superfund sites are on the National Priority Site Lists. The National Priorities List ("NPL") is the list of hazardous waste sites in the United States eligible for long-term remedial action financed under the federal Superfund program. Environmental Protection Agency regulations outline a formal process for assessing hazardous waste sites and placing them on the NPL. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation.

Sites are listed on the NPL upon completion of Hazard Ranking System (HRS) screening, public solicitation of comments about the proposed site, and after all comments have been addressed. EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines that no further response is required to protect human health or the environment. Sites where a remediation was completed through the Superfund program are typically deleted from the NPL.

Living near Superfund Sites in Ohio may place you and your communtiy at higher risk of getting sick from proximity to the site and experiencing a loss of value for your property, but there are steps you can take to fight back: The EPA says,

[We have] set up a "Post Construction Completion" (or PCC) strategy to ensure that Superfund response actions provide for the long-term protection of human health and the environment. EPA's Post Construction Completion activities also involve optimizing remedies to increase effectiveness and/or reduce cost without sacrificing long-term protection of human health and the environment.
Even so, most of the Superfund sites are still very dangerous to the well-being of local residents.

When you rely on Weitz & Luxenberg, you can trust the legal experience of skilled Toxic Tort attorneys who will help fight back against polluters and secure you and your loved ones the financial compensation and remediation to which you are entitled.

Below you can read the EPA report for the Feed Materials Production Center (Usdoe) Superfund site. If you, a loved one, or someone in your community has gotten sick due to toxic pollution in Feed Materials Production Center (Usdoe), or if your property has lost value because of pollution, you are better off with a toxic tort attorney who knows the people of the State of Ohio . Get started by filling out this simple form. There is no obligation, and your case will be evaluated within 24 hours. To refer a friend, neighbor, or loved one, follow this link to let them know about the environmental toxic tort lawyers at Weitz & Luxenberg.




Feed Materials Production Center (Usdoe)

This site is a Federal Facility.

Site Responsibility:

This site is being addressed through federal actions.

NPL Listing History:

Proposed Date: 07/14/89
Final Date: 11/21/89 

Threats and Contaminants

Some of the materials contained trace quantities of fission products (e.g. technetium-99) and transuranics (e.g. plutonium-239). As a result, the primary contaminants are radionuclides including uranium, thorium, and radium. Extensive contamination exists at the facility with over two thirds of the site containing uranium contaminated soil and a uranium groundwater plume 1.5 mile long and 1.8 mile wide exists onsite and offsite of the facility. 

Cleanup Progress

All five Records of Decision (RODs) were signed between 1994 and 1996 addressing all of the operable units at the site. Further, 27 of the 30 Removal Actions were completed between 1991 and 1999. However, failure of a pilot-scale vitrification plant to treat waste stored in three silos (Operable Unit 4) resulted in the need to amend the ROD for this operable unit (12/29/00). Currently, facilities are being constructed to remove the materials from the silos in 2004. The materials will be treated prior to shipment to an off site disposal facility and will be completed by 2006. To date the Silos project is 30% complete.

A railroad line and a waste/soil drying and loading facility to treat and ship waste materials from six waste pits to Envirocare of Utah has been completed with the first rail shipment occurring April 26, 1999. Waste from the pits is excavated, thermally dried, packaged in rail cars, and sent via rail for offsite disposal at Envirocare. To date, the project is 75% complete with more than 100 unit trains having shipped 650,000 tons of the projected 850,000 tons of waste in the pits. The project is projected to be completed by the end of calendar year 2004.

Six of the planned eight cells of the Onsite Disposal Facility (OSDF) have been completed. Cell 1 is full and has been capped; Cell 2 is full and capped; Cell 3 is 95% filled; Cell 4 is 25% filled; Cell 5 is 15% filled; and Cell 6 has the lower liner constructed and is receiving waste materials. Approximately 1,200,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil and debris has been placed in the six cells. The OSDF is projected to be completed in 2006 and to hold approximately 2.5 million cubic yards of material.

The process of safe shutdown to remove contaminated materials from pipelines and other equipment from 130 buildings at the site was completed in March 1999. Also, 130 of the 223 total structures have been demolished, and the demolition materials are being placed in the OSDF. This project is 60% complete. Also, all nuclear materials previously stored onsite have been taken offsite as of May 2002.

Offsite groundwater contamination is being contained via an extraction system installed in 1991. An extensive network of extraction and injection wells were installed and began operation in August 1998 to expedite groundwater treatment and contaminant removal. Since that time, 7.5 billion gallons of groundwater have been pumped from the aquifer, removing 4,600 pounds of uranium. The groundwater is being treated to return the aquifer to drinking water standards.

Also, the Southern Waste Units, the largest source of groundwater contamination from the Fernald site, has been removed. Over 60% of the site area has been demonstrated to have attained final soil cleanup levels.

Based on DOE's baseline schedule developed in 2001, the cleanup is expected be completed by 2006 with a total cost of $4 billion. Expedited activities and cooperation between United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA), DOE and its contractor Flour Fernald have resulted in reducing cleanup costs by $2 billion. Much of the success of this project has been as a result of the cooperative relationships between Ohio EPA and U.S. EPA working together as joint regulators to push progress on this large DOE complex.


Contact

Remedial Project Manager
Jim Saric
(312) 886-0992
saric.james@epa.gov

Community Involvement Coordinator
Susan Pastor
(312) 353-1325
pastor.susan@epa.gov

Gene Jablonowski
(312) 886-4591
jablonowski.gene@epa.gov

The Feed Materials Production Center, also known as the Fernald Environmental Management Project, is a 1,050-acre facility located in southwestern Ohio, approximately 19 miles northwest of downtown Cincinnati. The facility is located just north of the small rural town of Fernald, and has an estimated population of 14,600 residing within five miles of the site. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) constructed and operated the site from 1951 to 1991, producing high purity uranium metal in support of national defense programs. This was accomplished by chemically and physically purifying a variety of feed materials, converting uranium compounds into uranium metal, casting the metal into various shapes, and machining the castings to specified dimensions. 

All five Records of Decision (RODs) were signed between 1994 and 1996 addressing all of the operable units at the site. Further, 27 of the 30 Removal Actions were completed between 1991 and 1999. However, failure of a pilot-scale vitrification plant to treat waste stored in three silos (Operable Unit 4) resulted in the need to amend the ROD for this operable unit (12/29/00). Currently, facilities are being constructed to remove the materials from the silos in 2004. The materials will be treated prior to shipment to an off site disposal facility and will be completed by 2006. To date the Silos project is 30% complete.

A railroad line and a waste/soil drying and loading facility to treat and ship waste materials from six waste pits to Envirocare of Utah has been completed with the first rail shipment occurring April 26, 1999. Waste from the pits is excavated, thermally dried, packaged in rail cars, and sent via rail for offsite disposal at Envirocare. To date, the project is 75% complete with more than 100 unit trains having shipped 650,000 tons of the projected 850,000 tons of waste in the pits. The project is projected to be completed by the end of calendar year 2004.

Six of the planned eight cells of the Onsite Disposal Facility (OSDF) have been completed. Cell 1 is full and has been capped; Cell 2 is full and capped; Cell 3 is 95% filled; Cell 4 is 25% filled; Cell 5 is 15% filled; and Cell 6 has the lower liner constructed and is receiving waste materials. Approximately 1,200,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil and debris has been placed in the six cells. The OSDF is projected to be completed in 2006 and to hold approximately 2.5 million cubic yards of material.

The process of safe shutdown to remove contaminated materials from pipelines and other equipment from 130 buildings at the site was completed in March 1999. Also, 130 of the 223 total structures have been demolished, and the demolition materials are being placed in the OSDF. This project is 60% complete. Also, all nuclear materials previously stored onsite have been taken offsite as of May 2002.

Offsite groundwater contamination is being contained via an extraction system installed in 1991. An extensive network of extraction and injection wells were installed and began operation in August 1998 to expedite groundwater treatment and contaminant removal. Since that time, 7.5 billion gallons of groundwater have been pumped from the aquifer, removing 4,600 pounds of uranium. The groundwater is being treated to return the aquifer to drinking water standards.

Also, the Southern Waste Units, the largest source of groundwater contamination from the Fernald site, has been removed. Over 60% of the site area has been demonstrated to have attained final soil cleanup levels.

Based on DOE's baseline schedule developed in 2001, the cleanup is expected be completed by 2006 with a total cost of $4 billion. Expedited activities and cooperation between United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA), DOE and its contractor Flour Fernald have resulted in reducing cleanup costs by $2 billion. Much of the success of this project has been as a result of the cooperative relationships between Ohio EPA and U.S. EPA working together as joint regulators to push progress on this large DOE complex.

Community Involvement Coordinator
Susan Pastor
(312) 353-1325
pastor.susan@epa.gov

Gene Jablonowski
(312) 886-4591
jablonowski.gene@epa.gov

source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency




Act Now! It is essential that you inquire about your pollutant lawsuit as soon as possible. Ohio law may limit your time to bring a legal claim to protect your rights. Your legal review is free and there is no commitment. You case will be evaluated immediately, so get started on your claim today!

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Name
Email
Phone Number
City, State
What kind of pollution are you exposed to?
Please list any medical conditions you feel may have been caused by exposure to toxins:
Has anyone else in your community had similar experiences with pollutants as a result of living on or near a Superfund Site?
Has your property been devalued because of pollution? yes
no
Additional comments/questions:


see also:

Fields Brook Environmental Pollution in Ohio- Site: Fields Brook
Fields Brook Superfund Site Info - Fight Air Pollution, Water Pollution

Feed Materials Production Center (Usdoe) Environmental Pollution in Ohio- Site: Feed Materials Production Center (Usdoe)
Feed Materials Production Center (Usdoe) Superfund Site Info - Fight Air Pollution, Water Pollution

Fa - Fz Ohio Superfund Sites: Fa - Fz
Ohio Superfund Site Info - Fight Air Pollution, Water Pollution

Name
Phone
Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!    strictly confidential
Your Question
  • MESOTHELIOMA
    • Mesothelioma Treatment
    • Mesothelioma Symptoms
    • Lung Cancer
    • Help for Veterans
    • Asbestos Exposure
    • Your Legal Options
    • Mesothelioma Lawyer
    • Asbestos Cancer
  • DEFECTIVE MEDICINES AND DEVICES
      Actos
      DePuy Hip
      Fosamax
    • Accutane
    • Avandia
    • Depakote
    • Gadolinium
    • Hydroxycut
    • Paxil Birth Defects
    • Qui Tam
    • Reglan
    • Shoulder Pain Pumps
    • Topamax
    • Pelvic Mesh
    • Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella
    • Zimmer Durom
    • Zimmer NexGen-CR Flex Porous Femoral component
    • Zimmer LPS-Flex
    • Zoloft Birth Defects
  • ENTERTAINMENT LAW
    • Intellectual Property
    • Creative Rights
    • Royalties
    • Licensing Fees
    • Breach of Contract
    • Fraud
  • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
    • Arsenic
    • Benzene
    • Chromium
    • Dioxins
    • Gulf Oil Spill
    • Landfill Odors
    • Lead Poisoning
    • Mercury Poisoning
    • Pesticides
    • Petroleum Spills
    • PCB
    • Property Damage
    • Radium
    • TCE
    • Water Contamination
    • Vapor Intrusion
  • ACCIDENTS
    • Auto Accident
    • Car Accident
    • Elevator Accident
    • Truck Accident
    • Workplace Accident
    • Pedestrian Knock-down
    • Bicyclist Collision
    • Motorcycle Collision
    • Single-Car Collision
    • Toyota Recall
    • Two-Car Collision
    • Multi-Car Collision
  • PERSONAL INJURY
    • Aviation
    • Back Injury
    • Birth Defects
    • Burn Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Eye Injury
    • Life Insurance Law
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • Dog Bite
    • Stray Electricity
  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
    • New York Medical Malpractice
    • Anesthesia Complications
    • Birth Injury
    • Brachial Plexus Palsy
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Death
    • Erb’s Palsy
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Foreign Object
    • Hospital Error
    • Hydrocephalus
    • Informed Consent
    • Medication Error
    • Pain and Suffering
    • Paraplegia
    • Podiatric Malpractice
    • Quadriplegia
    • Surgical Error
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:


$423 million settlement
MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally
$16.5 million verdict
Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape
$1.4 million settlement
Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance
$1.5 million settlement
for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks
$6 million settlement
Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth
$53 million verdict
brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma
$13.5 million verdict
one of the very first Vioxx trial cases
$15 million settlement
man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care
$37 million verdict
2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs
$47 million verdict
boilermaker who died from mesothelioma
$2.6 million settlement
ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers
$75 million verdict
historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s
$8 million settlement
obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits
$64.65 million award
4 asbestos plaintiffs
$17.5 million
consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?
check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases,

get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 25 years, we’ve collected more than $7 billion for plaintiffs.

Copyright © 2012 Weitz & Luxenberg, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

Wi3 Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
HOME | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP | CONTACT US |NEWS CENTER | CAREERS