Expand Box Expand Box Expand Box Close Close

We're standing by & we can help. It's free and confidential.*

Reach us now Chat Image

OR (800) 476-6070

*I agree that submitting this form does not create an attorney client relationship and that Weitz & Luxenberg will use the information I am providing to check for conflicts of interest to determine if the firm can assist me.

Weitz and Luxenburg logo 

Contact Us Home Page Image

W&L, Allied Firms Obtain Stryker Hip Implants Settlement; Could Top $1 Billion

Stryker Corp. has agreed to pay potentially more than $1 billion to settle claims from patients injured by the company’s Rejuvenate and ABGII modular hip implants, the nationally prominent personal-injury law firm of Weitz & Luxenberg today announced.

The settlement capped nearly four months of intensive negotiations between Stryker and Weitz & Luxenberg’s Ellen Relkin along with co-counsels C. Calvin Warriner of the firm Searcy Denney, West Palm Beach, Fla.; Thomas R. Anapol of Anapol Schwartz, Philadelphia; and Tara Sutton of Minneapolis-based Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi, Weitz & Luxenberg said. Preceding those global negotiations were many months of individual bellwether mediations.

Relkin said the settlement talks proceeded in secret under the watchful eye of retired Magistrate Judge Diane Welsh, formerly of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Stryker Settlement Described

Details of the settlement — reached on behalf of approximately 3,000 patients implanted with the Rejuvenate or ABGII implants and later forced to undergo revision surgery — were made public by Bergen County, N.J., Superior Court Judge Brian R. Martinotti.

Most qualifying patients can expect compensation of at least $300,000 per failed implant; however, for the elderly it is adjusted downward in five percent increments from the age of 70, 75 and 80 until the age of 85, where the reduction is 20 percent said Relkin.

“The settlement also provides significant additional compensation for patients who suffered complications during revision surgery and for other damages, including future surgeries made necessary as a result of having been implanted with one of the defective devices,” Relkin disclosed.

“There is no overall cap or fixed fund for Stryker’s liability under this settlement program,” she emphasized.

Stryker’s modular Rejuvenate and ABGII hip-implant systems are so-called metal-on-metal devices, Relkin explained.

“Metal-on-metal hips have the potential for fretting and corrosion near the modular neck-stem junction of the implant that could result in adverse tissue reactions, metallosis, necrosis, osteolysis, and the need for hip-implant revision surgeries to remove the neck and stem of the implant,” she said.

Michigan-based Stryker Corporation and its Mahwah, N.J., subsidiary, Howmedica Osteonics, in 2012 issued a voluntary recall of the Rejuvenate and ABGII hip stems because of the fretting and corrosion problems, Relkin said.

Weitz & Luxenberg Filed First Stryker Lawsuit

The first lawsuit against Stryker and Howmedica was filed that same year by Weitz & Luxenberg acting as local counsel for the West Palm Beach, Fla., firm of Searcy Denney, said Relkin, emphasizing that the lawsuit was filed in Bergen County, N.J., through New York-based Weitz & Luxenberg’s Cherry Hill, N.J., office.

Later, the case was granted Multi-County Consolidation status following Relkin’s petition for that designation. Martinotti — one of New Jersey’s three Multi-County Litigation judges — was then appointed to preside over the case, Relkin recounted.

Martinotti was no stranger to hip-implant injury cases — at that time he was managing hundreds of such claims against DePuy Orthopaedics and its ASR artificial hips, another Multi-District Litigation, one in which Relkin was co-lead counsel, she noted.

In the Stryker case, Martinotti appointed Relkin as liaison counsel and Chairperson of the Plaintiff Steering Committee. Martinotti subsequently appointed four other attorneys to the committee recommended by Relkin; along with Anapol and Sutton they were David Buchanan of Seeger Weiss in New York City and Newark, and Tobias Millrood of Pennsylvania, Relkin said.

Importantly, Martinotti proactively sought to encourage a settlement in the Stryker case, Relkin said.

“Judge Martinotti worked quickly to establish a unique, innovative bellwether mediation process that resulted in individual settlements of 20 out of 21 mediated cases,” she said. “This set the stage for the global settlement that we are able to announce today.”

At one point in the proceedings, Martinotti praised Relkin for “doing an admirable job in representing all the plaintiffs’ interests in chambers, building a consensus with, those of you in the courtroom with her liaison and leadership team here, presenting a very cogent, well thought-out discussion with [the Stryker defense team].”

He stated yesterday, “I want to especially thank the lawyers who have led this litigation on behalf of the plaintiffs, especially Ellen Relkin,” going on to thank the other members of the Plaintiffs’ negotiating team as well as the defense negotiating team for successfully participating in the mediation process.

Relkin said the settlement is a huge win for the patients.

“Many of our clients are elderly or have become disabled from work,” she said. “As a result, most clients will probably and quite understandably be glad that a settlement of their cases has been obtained.”

Relkin offered that the settlement required much time, planning, and skillful execution to be reached. “We at Weitz & Luxenberg are absolutely thrilled to have helped bring this about,” she said.

Recent W&L Results

  • $1 Billion

    W&L's Ellen Relkin, as lead counsel in the NJ Rejuvenate and ABG II hip stem litigation, played a key role in negotiating the more than $1 billion settlement. Most qualifying plaintiffs will receive $300,000 or more.

  • $2.5 Billion

    W&L helped negotiate one of the largest mass tort settlements in recent history. More than 300 W&L clients are part of the settlement. Claimants had recalled DePuy ASR hips implanted and removed prior to August 31, 2013.

Free Case Evaluation
Defective Drugs and Devices

I'm pleased with the results Weitz & Luxenberg achieved for me in my recently settled case. I was suing a hip-replacement company that tried to act like they did nothing wrong. But the fact is they allowed a defective medical device to go out. That was incredibly wrong. This company needed to learn that their actions were incredibly wrong and that there are consequences to your bad actions.

- Barbara Zimmerman , Denver

W&L Facts

  • Our largest total settlement amount for one client was more than $10 million. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We got more than $3 billion in settlements for defective devices. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We helped more than 500 clients from Texas. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We got almost $40 million in settlements for dangerous birth control methods. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We helped more than 500 clients from Florida. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We helped clients from all 50 states. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We got more than $10 billion in settlements for dangerous medicines. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • Some clients get multiple settlements. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We won a $13.5 million verdict for one of the very first Vioxx trial cases. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We’ve been helping clients for more than 25 years. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We helped more than 1,500 clients from New York. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • More than 10,000 clients have used us as their legal advisors. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We’ve been fighting for your rights for more than 25 years. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We helped more than 800 clients from Arizona. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We worked with more than 550 clients harmed by dangerous medicines. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We earned almost $12 billion for our clients. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • Our largest single settlement was for $10 million. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We worked with more than 550 clients with hip replacement problems. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • We settled harmful medication cases totaling more than $10 billion. Defective Drugs and Devices
  • Our team has more than a dozen lawyers. Defective Drugs and Devices
<<Prev Next>> View more W&L Facts