The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
FONT SIZE: A A A A A

FAQ

Breach of Duty

in this section: Cause of Action | Breach of Duty | Causation | Personal Injury Damage - Financial Loss | Negligence & Remoteness | Cause of Action: Defense | Jurisdictions


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Cause of Action: Breach of duty

Breach of a duty is the second element to a negligence lawsuit. The question to be asked is: Would a reasonable person in a similar situation have done the same thing as the person being sued? To come to that conclusion both objective and subjective standards need to be considered.

The objective standard of breach of duty considers a hypothetical person and what his or her reasonable behavior might be. The subjective standard of breach of duty considers the actual person being sued and whether the jury thinks they acted reasonably in the matter at hand. See also: calculus of negligence.

Whether there is a breach of duty is determined by reference to the following factors:
The defendant's knowledge- e.g., whether a reasonable person in defendant's position would have foreseen the damage in the circumstances prevailing at the time of the alleged breach of duty.
The extent of risk- the greater the risk that serious harm can be inflicted, the greater the precautions that the defendant is required to take.
The feasibility of these precautions- if the precautions that should have been taken were not feasible, the defendant may not be held liable for failure to take those precautions.
The social significance of the defendant's actions. If the defendant's actions meet a socially useful purpose, then he or she may have been justified in taking greater risks, i.e. no breach of duty on part of the defendant

Your legal claim is too important to take chances with the wrong Negligence lawyer. Weitz & Luxenberg has been setting the standard in personal injury law for almost 20 years. For your Negligence claim, choose Weitz & Luxenberg, because experience counts.

Return to the Components of a Negligence Lawsuit

©


see also:

Breach of Duty Negligence Litigation - Negligence Lawyers - Breach of Duty
Learn about breach of duty and how it affects your case

Negligence & Remoteness How does "remoteness" apply to a negligence lawsuit?
The legal definition of remoteness in a negligence lawsuit

Glossary of Legal terms Free glossary of commonly used legal terms
Look here for a free glossary of free legal terms

Name Phone Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!   strictly confidential
Your Question
Free Legal Review
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:
$423 million settlement— MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally

$16.5 million verdict — Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape

$1.4 million settlement — Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance

$1.5 million settlement — for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks

$6 million settlement — Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth

$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims



Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases, get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 20 years, we’ve collected more than $1.3 billion for plaintiffs.