The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Choose Us   Settlements   Search

Offices Clinical Trial

Ch.1: Issues

in this section: Introduction | Ch.1: Issues | Ch.2: Taxability | Ch.3: Related Topics | Ch.4: Information | Ch.5: 3rd Party | Ch.6: The Case File | Ch.7: Examination | Ch.8: Penalties | Ch.9: Reporting | Ch.10: Case Synopsis | App A: Sample | App B: Letter | App C: Letter | App D: History


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Lawsuit Awards and Settlements: IRS Tax Law

With tax day fast approaching, Weitz & Luxenberg wants to ensure our clients have all the information they need to understand how to report their large settlements and lawsuit verdicts to the IRS. This information from the Internal Revenue Service does not consitute legal advice. We provide this document for informational purposes only. If you need help with your taxes, contact a tax attorney or an accountant. To file a personal injury lawsuit, click here.

Chapter 1, Issues

The following brief synopsis reflects the similarities and differences between the potential issues which may arise in lawsuit verdicts and settlements received prior to August 21, 1996, and those received on or subsequent to that date. Issues for Lawsuit Proceeds Received Prior to August 21, 1996
  1. Settlement proceeds are unreported.

  2. All punitive damages are taxable whether received in relation to a physical or non-physical injury (caution: Alabama wrongful death cases).

  3. Determine if any of the settlement proceeds are designated as interest, and if so, whether such interest is reported as income.

  4. For out of court settlements, determine if the taxpayer reported correct allocations between taxable type awards, such as punitive, back wages, etc., and non-taxable amounts, such as emotional distress damages (caution: back pay may be excludable if received under circumstances described in Rev. Rul. 93-88, 1993-2 C.B. 61, obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 96-65, 1996-2 C.B. 6)

  5. Verify that the taxpayer reported taxable amounts at gross rather than reporting them net of legal fees.

  6. Allowable legal fees should be deducted on Schedule A as miscellaneous itemized deductions, unless the origin of the claim litigated is related to a Schedule C (independent contractor), or a capital transaction. This guide does not address the proper treatment of legal fees paid and deducted in taxable years prior to the year of recovery.

  7. The legal fees deducted on Schedule A are a tax preference item for purposes of Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).

  8. For purposes of the AMT Credit, the legal fees which created AMT, are not allowed to generate the credit. They are "exclusion" items.


Issues for Lawsuit Proceeds Received After August 20, 1996

  1. Lawsuit proceeds are unreported.

  2. All punitive damages are taxable whether received in relation to a physical or non-physical injury (caution: Alabama wrongful death cases).

  3. Determine if any of the settlement proceeds are designated as interest, and if so, such interest is reported as income.

  4. Verify that amounts excluded from income were received in a case of physical injury. If it was not a physical injury, the only amounts excludable under IRC section 104(a)(2) are out of pocket costs for medical expenses incurred to treat emotional distress.

  5. For out of court settlements for physical injury cases, determine if proper amounts were allocated between compensatory and punitive damages.

  6. Verify the amount of out of pocket expense excluded for emotional distress in a non-physical injury case (that is, discrimination, fraud, etc.).

  7. Verify that the taxpayer reported taxable amounts at gross rather than reporting them net of legal fees paid.

  8. Allowable legal fees should be deducted on Schedule A as miscellaneous itemized deductions, unless the origin of the claim litigated is related to a Schedule C (independent contractor), or a capital transaction. This guide does not address the proper treatment of legal fees paid and deducted in taxable years prior to the year of recovery.

  9. The legal fees deducted on Schedule A are a tax preference item for purposes of AMT.

  10. For purposes of the AMT Credit, the legal fees which created AMT, are not allowed to generate the credit. They are "exclusion" items.

This comparison of issues before and after the 1996 law changes clearly reflects the fact that there is still much potential for adjustments in the area of lawsuit payments. By the time this guide is available service wide, a large portion of the examinations will probably be relating to post- August 20, 1996, payments. However, there may still be some pre-August 21, 1996, cases as well. For this reason, this guide provides assistance in examining the taxability of settlement payments received both on or prior and subsequent to, the amendment to IRC section 104 on August 20, 1996. (Note the exception to the effective date of this amendment).

For taxable years beginning after August 20, 1996, there will still be issues relating to allocations in out-of-court settlements. The allocation issues will be particularly important in out-of-court settlements for physical injury cases. Because many cases are settled to avoid the imposition of punitive damages, it is anticipated that the some taxpayers may erroneously allocate amounts between excludable and punitive damages in these cases. The allocation issue will not be as important in the non-physical cases because only out-of-pocket expenses for emotional distress are excludable under IRC section 104(a)(2) after August 20, 1996.

- Return to Table of Contents -

'
see also:

App A: Sample IRS Tax Law: Lawsuit Awards and Settlements, how to report your compensation
IRS-FREE Tax day help with your large settlements and lawsuit verdicts

Introduction IRS Tax Law: Lawsuit Awards and Settlements, how to report your compensation
IRS-FREE help with your large settlements and lawsuit verdicts

Tax Law IRS Tax Law: Lawsuit Awards and Settlements
IRS Information: Large settlements and lawsuit verdicts


Name Phone Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!   strictly confidential
Your Question

Click here for a free case review




$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims



Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases, get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 20 years, we’ve collected more than $1.3 billion for plaintiffs.