HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE
English En Français

FREE LEGAL REVIEW

First Name
Last Name
Home Phone
Work Phone
City and State
Email
Were you diagnosed with Asbestosis? Yes
Were you diagnosed with lung cancer? Yes
Were you diagnosed with Mesothelioma? yes
What is your date of diagnosis?
Additional Comments
Best time to call?

Justice Kennedy: Fear of Cancer Not Compensable As Pain and Suffering in Norfolk v. Ayers

Read more about the Norfolk v. Ayers case here.  In this section, Justice Kennedy provides his rationale for the fear of contracting cancer due to exposure to asbestos should not be considered in determining a pain and suffering award. Exposure to asbestos is known to cause serious diseases such as mesothelioma, asbestos-related lung cancer and asbestosis.

On the other hand, as the majority acknowledges, some courts have ruled that fear of cancer should not be compensable as pain and suffering. Ante, at 12, n. 10. These decisions are based, in part, upon the “separate disease rule,” which allows a person who has recovered for injuries resulting from asbestosis to bring a new lawsuit—notwithstanding the traditional common-law proscription against splitting a cause of action—if cancer develops. See Wilson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 684 F. 2d 111, 120– 121 (CADC 1982) (Ginsburg, J.). The rule has been adopted by a majority of jurisdictions, see Henderson & Twerski, Asbestos Litigation Gone Mad: Exposure-Based Recovery for Increased Risk, Mental Distress, and Medical Monitoring, 53 S. C. L. Rev. 815, 821, and n. 22 (2002) (collecting cases), and the Court does not suggest that it would not apply in cases brought under FELA.

The separate disease rule is pertinent for at least two reasons. First, it illustrates that courts have found it necessary to construct fair and sensible common-law rules for resolving the problems particular to asbestos litigation. Second, it establishes that a person with asbestosis will not be without a remedy for pain and suffering caused by cancer. That person can and will be compensated if the cancer develops. This eliminates the need courts might otherwise perceive to avert the danger that relief might be foreclosed in the future.

Courtesy of Opinion of Justice Kennedy in Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Petitioner v. Freeman Ayers et al.

Weitz & Luxenberg is a leading plaintiffs' law firm that has represented people affected by mesothelioma for over 20 years. Men and women diagnosed with mesothelioma caused by asbestos exposure may be entitled to compensation from the companies responsible for their disease.

If you would like a free consultation or more information about your legal options, please complete the form below, and a representative of our law firm will contact you as soon as possible.

Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos
Real Stories


IN THIS SECTION
Justice Kennedy’s Opinion: Part I
Fear of cancer
Mesothelioma Patients
Compensation in Norfolk vs. Ayers
Justice Kennedy opinion
Justice Kennedy's Opinion: Part II
Justice Kennedy’s Opinion: Part II A
Applying FELA
Emotional Distress
The Majority Opinion
Fear of Cancer Not Compensable
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Ruling
Pennsylvania Law Applied In Other Jurisdictions
Common Law Analysis
Responsibility Under FELA
Justice Kennedy’s Opinion: Part II B
The Respondents’ Claims
The Asbestos Jury's Analysis
Fear Must Be “Genuine and Serious”
Justice Kennedy’s Opinion: Part III


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Mesothelioma Resource Center
Asbestos
Asbestos Exposure Dangers
Asbestos Help
News & Warnings
Official Documents
Norfolk v. Ayers

Mesothelioma Lawyer

Asbestos Lawyer

Mesothelioma Attorney

Asbestos Attorney

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

Compensation in Norfolk vs. Ayers Opinion of Justice Kennedy on compensation in Norfolk vs. Ayers
Opinion of Justice Kennedy on compensation in Norfolk v. Freeman Ayers

Responsibility Under FELA Justice Kennedy: Does FELA apply in Norfolk v. Ayers asbestos case?
Justice Kennedy discusses Norfolk v. Ayers asbestos case and FELA

Justice Kennedy's Opinion Justice Kennedy concurs in part and dissents in part
Read Justice Kennedy's Opinion in the Norfolk v. Ayers case