The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Choose Us   Settlements   Search

Accidents Injuries Lead Paint Research Center

Epidemiology

in this section: Guidelines | Poisoning Prevention | Epidemiology | Exposure in Children | What is Lead


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Epidemiologic Notes and Reports Fatal Pediatric Poisoning from Leaded Paint

Although fatal lead poisoning among children occurs rarely in the United States, it represents a medical and public health emergency. This report summarizes the investigation of a child who died from poisoning associated with ingestion of leadbased paint.

On September 12, 1990, a 28-month-old Wisconsin boy was admitted to a hospital with a 4-day history of lethargy and reduced appetite. Although the child had no known past medical problems, his parents reported that he had eaten flaking paint. On initial neurologic examination, the child had extreme lethargy with facial palsy and gasping respirations, consistent with lead encephalopathy; laboratory results revealed severe lead toxicity and hematologic abnormalities (blood lead level (BLL) 144 ug divided by L; erythrocyte protoporphyrin level 593 ug divided by L; hemoglobin 8.1; and basophilic stippling). Despite chelation therapy with British antilewisite and calcium disodium edetate (CaNa 2-EDTA), the child developed seizures, became comatose, and died 26 hours after admission. An autopsy showed massive cerebral edema with uncal herniation. The intestines contained multiple roundworms (Ascaris lumbricoides) and flake-like material consistent with paint chips. Radiographs revealed prominent epiphyseal lines in the lower extremities, consistent with chronic lead exposure.

On September 20, staff from the Wisconsin Division of Health and the Waukesha County Health Department inspected the child's residence. The child and his parents had lived for at least 4 months on the second floor of a two-story, nonresidential structure built in 1923. The interior paint was badly deteriorated with paint chips visibly flaking from the walls and accumulating on floors, windowsills, and stairs. Eleven paint chip samples from the apartment ranged from 0.2% to 33.1% lead by weight (average: 9.1%); the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) permits a maximum of 0.06% lead in new residential paint.* House dust from the child's bedroom floor contained 3900 ug lead/ft2, and dust from a windowsill above the child's bed contained 31,128 ug lead/ft2. These levels are more than 10 times higher than those proposed in recent guidelines issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1), which recommend the maximum dust lead levels permissible before reoccupancy of a unit following lead paint abatement.

After the child's death, the parents moved and were unavailable for follow-up. The landlord has blocked access to the second floor and plans to eliminate the lead paint hazards in the building. Reported by: J Schirmer, MS, HA Anderson, MD, State Environmental Epidemiologist, Div of Health, Wisconsin Dept of Health and Social Svcs; LA Saryan, PhD, Industrial Toxicology Laboratory, West Allis Memorial Hospital, West Allis, Wisconsin. Lead Poisoning Prevention Br, Center for Environmental Health and Injury Control, CDC.

Editorial Note: Lead encephalopathy usually is associated with a BLL greater than 100 ug divided by L, although it has been reported at BLLs as low as 70 ug divided by L (2). As in this report, children with acute lead encephalopathy often have a recent history of prodromal symptoms, including anorexia, apathy, decreased play activity, hyperirritability, aggressiveness, poor coordination, and sporadic vomiting. Because lead encephalopathy in a child can rapidly progress to death, either a BLL greater than or equal to 70 ug divided by L in a child or the onset of encephalopathy constitutes an acute medical emergency.

At least four factors may account for the dramatic decline in the incidence of acute lead encephalopathy and childhood deaths from lead poisoning since the 1960s (3), including 1) increased screening of children at risk, 2) recognition of toxicity before the onset of life-threatening symptoms, 3) improvements in the treatment for lead poisoning, and 4) reduction of lead exposure from certain environmental sources. Although childhood deaths from poisoning associated with exposure to lead-based paint are now rare in the United States (4) (the most recently reported lead-based paint-associated death occurred in the mid-1970s (5)), subclinical toxicity is a widespread and persistent public health problem (6). BLLs as low as 10 ug divided by L, once considered safe, are now known to adversely affect cognitive development and behavior in children (7), with potentially long-term sequelae (8). In 1984, an estimated 3-4 million U.S. children had BLLs greater than or equal to 15 ug divided by L (6).

The primary source of high-dose lead exposure among children in U.S. urban areas is lead-based paint (6). Although CPSC banned lead-based paint for residential use in 1978, an estimated 12 million children less than 7 years of age reside in homes containing previously applied lead-based paint (6). Interior paints used before 1940 contained as much as 50% lead (9). Although children can ingest lead directly by eating paint chips, ingestion of lead-contaminated house dust and soil during normal mouthing and exploratory behaviors contributes substantially to elevating BLLs (10). The child reported in Wisconsin appeared to have been ingesting paint chips and was exposed to highly contaminated house dust.

All cases of lead poisoning are preventable. A national health objective for the year 2000 is to reduce the prevalence of children aged 6 months through 5 years with BLLs greater than 15 ug divided by L to less than 500,000 and the prevalence of those with BLLs greater than 25 ug divided by L to zero (11). Recently, several federal agencies responsible for housing, health, and the environment have focused attention on this problem and have set goals to abate lead-based paint in privately owned housing (12), reduce the number of children with elevated BLLs (13), and promote national efforts to eliminate childhood lead poisoning (14).

Act now! It is essential that you inquire about your case as soon as possible. Litigation may be the only way to receive the damages to which you may be entitled, such as medical and health care bills, lost or diminished wages, and financial compensation to family in the case of death. Have your children been hurt? Your individual state's law may limit your time to bring a legal claim to protect your rights. You need to have your lead paint claim evaluated immediately!


Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Name
Email
Phone Number
Best Time to Call
City/State
Was your child harmed by lead paint? Yes
No
When and where did the lead paint exposure occur?
If you suspect lead poisoning, please describe symptoms
Has anyone else in your community had similar experiences with lead paint?
How did you hear about Weitz & Luxenberg?
Additional Comments



see also:

Guidelines Negligence Litigation - Lead Paint Lawyers - CPSC Lead Paint Guidlines
Your legal claim is too important to take chances with the wrong Negligence lawyer.

Epidemiology Lead Paint Lawyers - Epidemiology
Weitz & Luxenberg has been setting the standard in personal injury law for almost 20 years. For your Lead Paint claim, choose Weitz & Luxenberg, because experience counts.

Lead Poisoning Lead Poisoning Information from Lead Paint Lawyer
Lead poisoning is a condition brought on by excessive amount of lead

Free Legal Review:
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:



For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims