HOME ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH

Analysis: The Atsbeha standard

Atsbeha, a criminal case, involved the application of a change in the law of evidence announced in State v. Ellis, 136 Wn.2d 498, 963 P.2d 843 (1998). The Chevron Oil test by its own terms only applies in a case in which a new rule is being adopted, not when a relatively new rule from another decision is being applied. Further, while the Washington Supreme Court cited to its earlier decision in Digital Equip. Corp. v. Dept. of Revenue for the elements of the Chevron Oil test, the next paragraph of that decision cites Robinson for the proposition that the precedential weight of Chevron Oil had been called into question by recent United States Supreme Court decisions. 129 Wn.2d 177, 184, 916 P.2d 933 (1996).

The Digital court concluded, "Chevron Oil no longer controls in this area." Id., at 188. Moreover, Chevron Oil was a test for application of a new rule adopted in a federal civil case, and has not been applied to application of a new rule adopted in a state criminal case. There was no precedent for use of Chevron Oil in this context.

Courtesy of The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos


IN THIS SECTION
Facts of the case
Defendant motion for summary judgment
strict liability
Summary judgment standard
Review on appeal
Retroactive application standard
Strict liability for product defect
Restatement of Torts
Washington Supreme Court Decisions
Washington appellate court decisions
Retroactive application
U.S. Supreme Court decision
Applicability of Chevron Oil
Application standard
Taskett King Broad rule
Strict product liability standard
Robinson not overruled
Atsbeha standard
Binding precedent
Griffith and St. Pierre cases
Audett case
Chevron standard
American Law Institute


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Asbestos
Asbestos Help: More Information
News & Warnings
see also:

Retroactive application Discussion of retroactive application in Lunsford mesothelioma case
Read about retroactive application in Lunsford mesothelioma case

U.S. Supreme Court decision Lunsford mesothelioma case: Discussion of Supreme Court decision
Read about Lunsford mesothelioma case and a Supreme Court decision

The Lunsford case Lunsford case relating to asbestos and mesothelioma
Read about the Lunsford case relating to asbestos and mesothelioma

Malignant Mesothelioma Information:Lawyer & Attorney:Facts, Symptoms, Asbestos Removal, Lawsuit, Litigation. Other terms used to find this site include:malignant mesothelioma, pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma, mesothelioma treatment, mesothelioma lawsuit, asbestos, asbestos cancer, asbestos lawyer, asbestos attorney.

Advanced Bionics, Advanced Bionics lawsuit, Cochlear Implants Lawyer, Deaf Attorney, CI, Failed Cochlear Implants, Digitek, Digitek death, Digitek Lawyer, Digitalis Lawsuit, Digitek Attorneys Shelhigh, Shelhigh Lawyers, Shelhigh Attorneys, Shelhigh Lawsuit, Avandia, Avandia Lawsuit, Avandia Lawyers, Avandia Attorney Gadolinium, Gadolinium Lawsuit, MRI Contrast Attorney, Gadolinium Lawyers, Injury, Injury Lawsuit, Injury Lawyer, Injury Attorney, Accidents, Accident Lawyers Malpractice, Malpractice Lawyers, Malpractice Case, Malpractice Attorney, Malpractice Lawsuit, Heparin, Heparin Lawsuit, Heparin Lawyer, Heparin Attorney