Analysis: Review on appeal
Saberhagen contends that Lunsford is attempting to raise the retroactivity argument, and should be precluded from doing so because he did not raise this argument below.
Generally, failure to raise an issue before the trial court precludes a party from raising it on appeal. Smith v. Shannon, 100 Wn.2d 26, 37, 666 P.2d 351 (1983); RAP 2.5.
But if an issue raised for the first time on appeal is "arguably related" to issues raised in the trial court, a court may exercise its discretion to consider newly-articulated theories for the first time on appeal. See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Amirpanahi, 50 Wn. App. 869, 751 P.2d 329 (1988).
Courtesy of The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington
Discussion of mesothelioma application standard in Lunsford case