The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Choose Us   Settlements   Search

Medical Malpractice Hospital Malpractice Research Center

Malpractice: DIEP Breast Surgery

in this section: Hip Surgery Malpractice | Uterine Fibroid Malpractice | Malpractice: ECT to treat Depression | Malpractice: DIEP Breast Surgery | Malpractice: What is the Doctor Saying? | $12M Tampa hospital malpractice verdict | Liposuction malpractice charges | $18M Wisconsin hospital malpractice verdict | Ed McMahon sues hospital over neck injury | Ed McMahon lawsuit update | Michigan Supreme Court: $2.3M award | Florida Lt. Governor sues hospital | New York judge quadruples malpractice award


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Malpractice:  When Your Doctor Doesn't Advise on DIEP Breast Reconstruction Surgery

Patients who suffer from chronic illness, as well as those recovering from surgery, depend on their medical team to provide them with information about new therapies and treatments. According to a June 2008 report published by the Associated Press, for many reasons, including fears of malpractice litigation, physicians are sometimes hesitant to recommend a new surgical procedure for breast reconstruction surgery known as DIEP.

While federal law mandates that all insurance companies pay for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction surgery, for the most part, women are typically presented with saline or silicone implant options.

In the new procedure, called a DIEP flap, the surgeon moves a patient's abdominal skin and fat to her chest, transferring and reattaching blood vessels and sometimes nerves in the process. The DIEP flap leaves the abdominal muscles intact. Experts claim the DIEP flap procedure is better for the patients, since preserving the abdominal muscles means patients are better able to resume normal and everyday activities after recovery. Experts also cite reports of patients regaining sensation in their breasts after DIEP surgery. And since the DIEP procedure does not involve implants, the emotional benefits of the procedure are significant, as patients tend to view the procedure and outcome as a “real” breast.

Unfortunately, the surgery is not often recommended to patients. As of the June 1998 AP article, fewer than 100 surgeons in the U.S. are qualified to perform this type of surgery. And because the surgical costs are much higher than a typical implant surgery, insurers are reluctant to approve DIEP.

If you believe you have a medical malpractice lawsuit, please complete the form below for a free review of your potential case.

A representative from our firm will be in touch with you shortly.

    Click To Talk To Us Online

    Please complete the following questionnaire:

    Name
    Email
    Phone Number
    Best time to call
    City/State
    What medical procedure were you having done?
    How were you injured?
    How did you hear about Weitz & Luxenberg?
    Additional Comments


    see also:

    Malpractice: What is the Doctor Saying? Do you know what your doctor is saying? Medical malpractice risks
    Malpractice: You need to understand what your doctor is saying

    Ed McMahon sues hospital over neck injury TV personality Ed McMahon sues LA hospital for neck injury malpractice
    Ed McMahon charges malpractice over misdiagnosis of broken neck injury

    Breaking News Tips for preventing hospital and medical malpractice mistakes
    Preventing medical malpractice hospital mistakes: Tips from the AHRQ

    Free Legal Review:
    Name:
    Phone:
    Email:
    Case Description:



    For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
    Ask a Free Question:
    Were you injured?

    check for your response [login]
    $53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

    $13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

    $15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

    $37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

    $47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

    $2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

    $75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

    $12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

    $8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

    $64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

    $17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims