The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Choose Us   Settlements   Search

Medical Malpractice Hospital Malpractice Research Center

Hip Surgery Malpractice

in this section: Hip Surgery Malpractice | Uterine Fibroid Malpractice | Malpractice: ECT to treat Depression | Malpractice: DIEP Breast Surgery | Malpractice: What is the Doctor Saying? | $12M Tampa hospital malpractice verdict | Liposuction malpractice charges | $18M Wisconsin hospital malpractice verdict | Ed McMahon sues hospital over neck injury | Ed McMahon lawsuit update | Michigan Supreme Court: $2.3M award | Florida Lt. Governor sues hospital | New York judge quadruples malpractice award


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Is it Malpractice When Your Doctor Doesn't Advise on New Therapies and Treatments for Hip Surgery?

Patients who suffer from chronic illness, as well as those recovering from surgery, depend on their medical team to provide them with information about new therapies and treatments. According to a June 2008 report published by the Associated Press, for many reasons, including fears of malpractice litigation, physicians are sometimes hesitant to recommend new treatments for chronic hip arthritis. 

For those who suffer from mild to moderate forms of the disease, the normal treatment includes the advice for patients to wait until they are in their late 50’s or early 60’s before they can be considered for a full or partial hip replacement. By that time, some patients will have been living with pain and range of motion problems for 10-20 years.

A newer procedure, approved by the FDA in 2006, is hip resurfacing. There are two types of the procedure: a total resurfacing, where the ball of the hip is resurfaced only, and glides against a cup placed in the socket. In a hemi resurfacing, only the head is resurfaced, and the socket is left alone.

While the procedure is gaining in frequency, some orthopedic surgeons are reluctant to recommend the procedure to their patients. Physicians interviewed for the AP article cite claims that physician reluctance stems from the newness of the procedure and the lack of long term data on the effectiveness of the procedure.

If you believe you have a medical malpractice lawsuit, please complete the form below for a free review of your potential case.

A representative from our firm will be in touch with you shortly.

    Click To Talk To Us Online

    Please complete the following questionnaire:

    Name
    Email
    Phone Number
    Best time to call
    City/State
    What medical procedure were you having done?
    How were you injured?
    How did you hear about Weitz & Luxenberg?
    Additional Comments


    see also:

    $12M Tampa hospital malpractice verdict Tampa hospital found liable of medical malpractice in infant death
    $12 million malpractice award in Tampa hospital infant death case

    Hip Surgery Malpractice Malpractice: Did your doctor tell you about new hip surgery treatments
    Malpractice: New hip surgery therapies and treatments are available

    Breaking News Tips for preventing hospital and medical malpractice mistakes
    Preventing medical malpractice hospital mistakes: Tips from the AHRQ

    Free Legal Review:
    Name:
    Phone:
    Email:
    Case Description:



    For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
    Ask a Free Question:
    Were you injured?

    check for your response [login]
    $53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

    $13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

    $15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

    $37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

    $47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

    $2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

    $75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

    $12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

    $8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

    $64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

    $17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims