The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Contact Us   Verdicts   Search

Previous Investigations Other Litigations Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Leads Research News & Warnings

FDA Responds

in this section: FDA Explains Sprint Fidelis Leads | Sprint Fidelis Recall | 1st Step If You Use a Medtronic Sprint Fidelis


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

FDA Comments on Medtronic's Voluntary Market Suspension of Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator Leads

Statement on Medtronic's Voluntary Market Suspension of Their Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator Leads

For Immediate Release: October 15, 2007

Media Inquiries: Karen Riley, 301-827-6242
Consumer Inquiries: 888-INFO-FDA

Statement by Daniel Schultz, M.D., director of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health: Medtronic's decision to voluntarily remove its Sprint Fidelis defibrillation leads from the market is in the best interest of patient safety.

These electronic wires are prone to fracture in a small number of patients which can cause the defibrillator to deliver unnecessary shocks or not operate at all. Based on our initial review of reported adverse events, some deaths and major complications have occurred after the leads have fractured.

Defibrillators are life-saving products for patients with a heart rhythm abnormality. We know it can be frightening for a patient to learn that a product they rely on so much might have a serious defect. However, patients can be assured that the likelihood of fracture is very low and FDA is committed to ensuring that the risk to patients is minimized.

Background:
Today, Medtronic announced it was voluntarily suspending distribution of its Sprint Fidelis defibrillation leads because a small number of fractures have been detected. As a result of Medtronic's action, no more Sprint Fidelis leads will be sold or manufactured and any remaining product should be pulled from inventory and returned to the company. Patients who are implanted with this lead are encouraged to contact their physicians for further information.

Medtronic first notified physicians in March about the fracture rate at that time and the proper method for implantation. Additional data on adverse events accumulated since then has prompted today's action.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillators (CRT-Ds) are used to treat abnormal heart rhythms that can cause the heart to stop suddenly. ICDs and CRT-Ds shock the heart back into normal rhythm by sending a pulse of energy through an electronic wire or lead that is connected to the heart.

When a defibrillator lead is slightly more prone to fracture, most leads will function well, as is the case with Sprint Fidelis. In the infrequent circumstance where a lead actually breaks, or "fractures," the lead may send false signals that cause inappropriate defibrillator shocks, or therapies such as pacing or shocks may not be delivered.

Current adverse event information indicates that fractures have occurred in less than 1 percent of the approximately 268,000 of these leads implanted worldwide. We don't know if this rate of adverse events will remain constant or increase over the life of these leads.

FDA considers Medtronic's action to be a product recall, as defined by FDA regulations, and we will soon be issuing a recall classification for this action. We recognize that some patients and health care professionals might inappropriately interpret the word "recall" to mean that the devices must be surgically removed and returned to the manufacturer. Although the leads should no longer be implanted in patients, we do not mean to imply that these leads should be surgically removed.

The leads continue to function properly in the vast proportion of patients. Although there is no test to predict which lead will fracture, FDA agrees with Medtronic's recommendation that defibrillator settings be adjusted at the patient's next scheduled follow-up visit with their doctor. Doing so may increase the likelihood that a fracture will be detected before a patient is harmed.

Neither FDA, Medtronic, nor representatives of the Heart Rhythm Society, recommend the routine surgical removal of a fractured lead because removal carries risks. Instead, physicians should weigh the benefits and risks of either continuing to use the lead with careful monitoring or capping the lead so it is no longer useable and implanting a different model.

Patients should recognize that a small number of Sprint Fidelis leads are used with defibrillators made by manufacturers other than Medtronic. If patients have reason to believe that they have a Sprint Fidelis lead or if they do not know the model of their lead, they should contact their health care professional. FDA will continue to monitor information on these devices and will take whatever other actions may be necessary.

Courtesy of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Name
Email
Phone Number
Were you implanted with a Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Lead?
If yes, when?
Has your defibrillator failed to work?
If yes, please describe failure
Has your Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Lead been replaced?
If yes, when?
Additional comments


see also:

FDA Explains Sprint Fidelis Leads Have Questions About Sprint Fidelis Leads?
Sprint Fidelis Leads Are Explained by The FDA

Sprint Fidelis Recall Sprint Fidelis Recall
Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Recall

FDA Responds Breaking News from the FDA on Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Leads Recall
Vital information about Medtronic Sprint Fidelis leads

Name
Phone
Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!    strictly confidential
Your Question
  • MESOTHELIOMA
    • Mesothelioma Treatment
    • Mesothelioma Symptoms
    • Lung Cancer
    • Help for Veterans
    • Asbestos Exposure
    • Your Legal Options
    • Mesothelioma Lawyer
    • Asbestos Cancer
  • DEFECTIVE MEDICINES AND DEVICES
      Actos
      DePuy Hip
      Fosamax
    • Accutane
    • Avandia
    • Depakote
    • Gadolinium
    • Hydroxycut
    • Paxil Birth Defects
    • Qui Tam
    • Reglan
    • Shoulder Pain Pumps
    • Topamax
    • Pelvic Mesh
    • Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella
    • Zimmer Durom
    • Zimmer NexGen-CR Flex Porous Femoral component
    • Zimmer LPS-Flex
    • Zoloft Birth Defects
  • ENTERTAINMENT LAW
    • Intellectual Property
    • Creative Rights
    • Royalties
    • Licensing Fees
    • Breach of Contract
    • Fraud
  • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
    • Arsenic
    • Benzene
    • Chromium
    • Dioxins
    • Gulf Oil Spill
    • Landfill Odors
    • Lead Poisoning
    • Mercury Poisoning
    • Pesticides
    • Petroleum Spills
    • PCB
    • Property Damage
    • Radium
    • TCE
    • Water Contamination
    • Vapor Intrusion
  • ACCIDENTS
    • Auto Accident
    • Car Accident
    • Elevator Accident
    • Truck Accident
    • Workplace Accident
    • Pedestrian Knock-down
    • Bicyclist Collision
    • Motorcycle Collision
    • Single-Car Collision
    • Toyota Recall
    • Two-Car Collision
    • Multi-Car Collision
  • PERSONAL INJURY
    • Aviation
    • Back Injury
    • Birth Defects
    • Burn Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Eye Injury
    • Life Insurance Law
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • Dog Bite
    • Stray Electricity
  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
    • New York Medical Malpractice
    • Anesthesia Complications
    • Birth Injury
    • Brachial Plexus Palsy
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Death
    • Erb’s Palsy
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Foreign Object
    • Hospital Error
    • Hydrocephalus
    • Informed Consent
    • Medication Error
    • Pain and Suffering
    • Paraplegia
    • Podiatric Malpractice
    • Quadriplegia
    • Surgical Error
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:


$423 million settlement
MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally
$16.5 million verdict
Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape
$1.4 million settlement
Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance
$1.5 million settlement
for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks
$6 million settlement
Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth
$53 million verdict
brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma
$13.5 million verdict
one of the very first Vioxx trial cases
$15 million settlement
man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care
$37 million verdict
2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs
$47 million verdict
boilermaker who died from mesothelioma
$2.6 million settlement
ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers
$75 million verdict
historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s
$8 million settlement
obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits
$64.65 million award
4 asbestos plaintiffs
$17.5 million
consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?
check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases,

get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 25 years, we’ve collected more than $7 billion for plaintiffs.

Copyright © 2012 Weitz & Luxenberg, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

Wi3 Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
HOME | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP | CONTACT US |NEWS CENTER | CAREERS