HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE
English En Français

FREE LEGAL REVIEW

First Name
Last Name
Home Phone
Work Phone
City and State
Email
Were you diagnosed with Asbestosis? Yes
Were you diagnosed with lung cancer? Yes
Were you diagnosed with Mesothelioma? yes
What is your date of diagnosis?
Additional Comments
Best time to call?

Owens Illinois vs. Harry Cook Mesothelioma Case: Was the jury influenced by mention of award cap?

Read the Maryland Appeals Court opinion in Owens Illinois vs. Cook, where the issues surrounding whether an attorney’s mention of an award cap merits a mistrial is further discussed. In this mesothelioma case, the parties argue regarding the amount of damages awarded to the surviving spouse, who did not marry the decedent until after his last known exposure to asbestos.

Immediately after the mention of the word “cap,” counsel for Owens-Illinois, Ms. Tostanoski, objected. Counsel then approached the bench and the following exchange occurred:

THE COURT: You can’t mention that.

MR. FLERLAGE [PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL]: I know.

MS. TOSTANOSKI: Your Honor, I move for mistrial. I am serious.

MR. FLERLAGE: I think that can be cured with an instruction, if you think it is necessary at all, because they don’t know what a cap is.

MS. TOSTANOSKI: Of course, they know what a cap is. Of course, they know. There are salary caps on sports teams, and there is no way they don’t know what a cap is, Judge. What they don’t know is that they have no idea why they are making this decision. Mr. Flerlage is telling them they are making a finding of fact for Your Honor to make a decision, and now he had told them about a cap. It is prejudicial. There is no way that can be corrected.

MS. TOSTANOSKI: The statute is clear that a jury can never be told about that.
THE COURT: Well, it wasn’t told about it.
MS. TOSTANOSKI: Of course, they were.
MR. FLERLAGE: I don’t think it does any good at this point to highlight whatever the jury does perceive from that.
THE COURT: Such an experienced lawyer. I am not going to rule on it. I am going to hold [sub curia] the motion for mistrial.

The next morning, after deliberations had begun, the jury sent the trial judge a note that read: “Is [sic] are there any caps as to the amounts given by law?” The court answered: “That is no concern. You do not even consider, deliberate, or talk about whether there is or is not a cap. Okay?”

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with an asbestos illness like mesothelioma, lung cancer or asbestosis, complete the form on this page to get a FREE and prompt review of your case by a leading asbestos attorney. Weitz & Luxenberg is a leading mesothelioma law firm with a substantial history of success in asbestos exposure cases.

Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos
Real Stories


Mesothelioma
Mesothelioma Resource Center
Mesothelioma
Information about Diagnosis
Latest News
Verdicts and Settlements
IN THIS SECTION
Scribner mesothelioma case
Grimshaw mesothelioma case
Cook mesothelioma case
Mesothelioma case backgound
Mesothelioma case issues
Mesothelioma mistrial
Award cap in mesothelioma case

Mesothelioma Lawyer

Asbestos Lawyer

Mesothelioma Attorney

Asbestos Attorney

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

Mesothelioma mistrial Information about the mistrial motion in a mesothelioma case here
Learn about the mistrial motion made in the Cook mesothelioma case

Mesothelioma case issues Information on the mesothelioma issues in the Cook case on our website
Learn about the mesothelioma case issues resolved by Scribnner here

Owens mesothelioma case Read about a discussion of the Owens mesothelioma case on our site
Read about the Owens mesothelioma case on our website. Click to enter.