HOME STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH
ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE
English En Français

FREE LEGAL REVIEW

First Name
Last Name
Home Phone
Work Phone
City and State
Email
Were you diagnosed with Asbestosis? Yes
Were you diagnosed with lung cancer? Yes
Were you diagnosed with Mesothelioma? yes
What is your date of diagnosis?
Additional Comments
Best time to call?

Notes on PSI Energy v. Roberts Mesothelioma Case: Part 2

The continuation of the footnotes in the Opinion in PSI Energy v. Roberts, Roberts’ work history are listed in this page regarding the reference to Ind. Trial Rule 50(A). In this case, Roberts was exposed to asbestos at his workplace, which led to his eventual diagnosis of mesothelioma.

Footnote: Ind. Trial Rule 50(A) provides that:

Where all or some of the issues in a case tried before a jury or an advisory jury are not supported by sufficient evidence or a verdict thereon is clearly erroneous as contrary to the evidence because the evidence is insufficient to support it, the court shall withdraw such issues from the jury and enter judgment thereon or shall enter judgment thereon notwithstanding a verdict. A party may move for such judgment on the evidence.

  • after another party carrying the burden of proof or of going forward with the evidence upon any one or more issues has completed presentation of his evidence thereon; or after all the parties have completed presentation of the evidence upon any one or more issues; or after all the evidence in the case has been presented and before judgment; or in a motion to correct errors; or
  • may raise the issue upon appeal for the first time in criminal appeals but not in civil cases; or The trial court upon its own motion may enter such a judgment on the evidence at any time before final judgment, or before the filing of a notice of appeal, or, if a Motion to Correct Error is made, at any time before entering its order or ruling thereon. A party who moves for judgment on the evidence at the close of the evidence offered by an opponent may offer evidence in the event that the motion is not granted, without having reserved the right so to do and to the same extent as if the motion had not been made. A motion for a judgment on the evidence which is not granted or which is granted only as to a part of the issues is not a waiver of trial by jury even though all parties to the action have moved for judgment on the evidence. A motion for judgment on the evidence made at one stage of the proceedings is not a waiver of the right of the court or of any party to make such motion on the same or different issues or reasons at a later stage as permitted above, except that error of the court in denying the motion shall be deemed corrected by evidence thereafter offered or admitted.

Courtesy of the Indiana Court of Appeals and the State of Indiana

Other helpful links:

Asbestos Asbestos
Asbestos and lung cancer Asbestos and lung cancer
Mesothelioma attorney Mesothelioma attorney
Mesothelioma Lawyer Mesothelioma lawyer
Asbestos attorney Asbestos attorney

Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos
Real Stories


IN THIS SECTION
Liability premise in mesothelioma insulator case
Liability premise in mesothelioma defendant appeal
Liability premise in mesothelioma landowner appeal
Jury’s liability theories in mesothelioma appeal
Mesothelioma: The Facts
Link between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma
Work history of mesothelioma employee victim
Witness testimony in mesothelioma worker case
Roberts mesothelioma diagnosis in PSI appeal
Mesothelioma jury verdict in PSI Energy v. Roberts
Mesothelioma case analysis: PSI Energy v. Roberts
Liability reexamined in Indiana mesothelioma case
Restatement of Torts examined in mesothelioma case
Restatement of Torts section in mesothelioma case
Restatement of Torts in mesothelioma case
Analysis: Restatement of Torts, mesothelioma case
Watson v. Ziegart cited in mesothelioma appeal
Premises liability reexamined in mesothelioma case
Liability theory reexamined in mesothelioma case
Appeals Court affirms denial in mesothelioma case
Footnotes in Opinion of mesothelioma case
Notes in mesothelioma case PSI Energy v. Roberts
Conclusion of notes in mesothelioma case


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Mesothelioma Resource Center
Mesothelioma
Information about Diagnosis
Latest News
Verdicts and Settlements

Mesothelioma Lawyer

Asbestos Lawyer

Mesothelioma Attorney

Asbestos Attorney

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

see also:

Restatement of Torts section in mesothelioma case Court examines Restatement of Torts section in mesothelioma case
More on Section 343, Restatement of Torts, in mesothelioma case

Witness testimony in mesothelioma worker case Witness testimony reexamined in Indiana mesothelioma worker case
Details of witness testimony in Indiana mesothelioma worker case

Mesothelioma victim wins appeal Indiana Court affirms opinion for mesothelioma employee, Roberts
PSI Energy challenged court ruling for a mesothelioma victim, Roberts