HOME ASBESTOS DRUGS POLLUTANTS ACCIDENTS MALPRACTICE STORY OF OUR FIRM SEARCH

Analysis: Review of Washington appellate court decisions

Numerous appellate decisions have applied strict liability to claims arising from exposures to asbestos that occurred before the adoption of § 402A. See e.g. Mavroudis, 86 Wn. App. at 22 (upholding a jury verdict finding strict liability under pre-WPLA law based on inadequate warnings of exposure occurring between 1957 and 1963); Van Hout v. Celotex Corp., 121 Wn.2d 697, 853 P.2d 908 (1993) (holding that under pre-WPLA law, strict liability should have been applied for exposure occurring between 1946 and 1980); Krivanek v. Fibreboard Corp., 72 Wn. App. 632-33, 865 P.2d 527 (1993) (upholding a jury verdict based on pre-WPLA strict liability standards for exposure occurring between 1953 and 1986); Falk v. Keene Corp., 113 Wn.2d 645; 782 P.2d 974 (1989) (holding that the WPLA did not change the standard to negligence—it remained strict liability as explained in § 402A and as adopted by Ulmer and Tabert—and remanding for application of strict liability to claims arising from exposure between 1947 and 1953); Lockwood v. AC&S, Inc., 109 Wn.2d 235, 744 P.2d 605 (1987) (upholding a jury verdict finding AC& S strictly liable for exposure to asbestos occurring between 1942 and 1972). In none of these cases did the court limit the application to the specific facts of each situation.

Courtesy of The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington

For legal help anywhere in the U.S. call:

1 - 800 - 476 - 6070

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Home Page
head Mesothelioma: An Overview
kleio The Clock Is Ticking
asbestos Our Toughest Cases
head Diagnosis
treatment Symptoms, Stages, Treatment
kleio Latest News
New York Numbers
Asbestos


IN THIS SECTION
Facts of the case
Defendant motion for summary judgment
strict liability
Summary judgment standard
Review on appeal
Retroactive application standard
Strict liability for product defect
Restatement of Torts
Washington Supreme Court Decisions
Washington appellate court decisions
Retroactive application
U.S. Supreme Court decision
Applicability of Chevron Oil
Application standard
Taskett King Broad rule
Strict product liability standard
Robinson not overruled
Atsbeha standard
Binding precedent
Griffith and St. Pierre cases
Audett case
Chevron standard
American Law Institute


RETURN BACK TO
Mesothelioma
Asbestos
Asbestos Help: More Information
News & Warnings
see also:

Review on appeal Lunsford case: mesothelioma and review on appeal
Learn about review on appeal from the Lunsford mesothelioma case

Griffith and St. Pierre cases The Lunsford mesothelioma case and Griffith
Read about the Lunsford mesothelioma case and Griffith case

The Lunsford case Lunsford case relating to asbestos and mesothelioma
Read about the Lunsford case relating to asbestos and mesothelioma