The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Why Choose Us?   Results   Search

Environmental Pollution MTBE Research Center

News & Warnings

in this section: Breaking News | Energy Policy Act | Congress Debates | Your Rep's Vote | Rep Bartlett's PR


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Weitz & Luxenberg Lawyers Condemn Energy Bill Relating to MTBE

April 22, 2005 New York, NY New York Lawyers at Weitz & Luxenberg are dismayed at the House of Representative’s approval of an energy bill that protects major oil companies from water contamination lawsuits stemming from the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). The bill also gives $2 billion to oil companies to help them foot the cost of phasing MTBE out of their products.

In the late 1970s, the oil industry began adding MTBE to its gasoline to act as an octane booster. In 1990, the Clean Air Act stipulated that oil companies must oxygenate gasoline to reduce air pollution. Given their choice of oxygenates, oil companies stuck by MTBE, which was a profit-making by-product of their own refinery processes, despite the availability of non-polluting oxygenates such as ethanol, the use of which would have benefited the American farmer.

MTBE is highly water-soluble, resists biodegradation, and moves rapidly in groundwater. If MTBE escapes from its container via a leak or spill, it actively seeks out and contaminates groundwater. Once MTBE has contaminated a drinking water source, its chemical nature makes it extremely difficult, expensive, and time-consuming to remove. Even small amounts of MTBE can render an entire community's groundwater supply undrinkable, with an unpleasant turpentine-like taste and odor. The Environmental Protection Agency has called MTBE “a potential human carcinogen.”

Weitz & Luxenberg reviews MTBE cases related to water systems that require remediation.  We are not litigating any personal injury claims involving MTBE.

Oil companies argued that lawsuits brought by plaintiffs demanding that the companies pay for the cost of MTBE cleanup are unfair, and that the accountability for shouldering the cost of cleanup should fall on those directly responsible for the spills, not the makers of oxygenated gasoline products. Gasoline products from several companies are often run through common pipelines before they end up at gas stations or underground storage tanks. If these pipelines or storage tanks leaks, the results can be disastrous to a community’s groundwater supply.

Weitz & Luxenberg, a leading player in MTBE litigation, represents several water systems nationwide. On April 20, 2005, the firm won a major victory in Manhattan’s Federal District Court when Judge Shira A. Scheindlin ruled that oil companies including Exxon Mobil Corp., BP PLC, Sunoco Inc., and Amerada Hess Corp., must defend dozens of lawsuits accusing them of polluting groundwater with MTBE. The lawsuits seek to hold oil companies responsible for the significant cost of MTBE cleanup in communities’ water supplies.

The House-approved energy bill will be enacted only if the Senate can pass legislation that both chambers agree on. If the bill passes both chambers, President Bush will most likely sign it into law. The bill reflects many of the President’s energy priorities, including massive tax breaks for the oil and gas industry and opening the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the waters of the Gulf of Mexico up to drilling for oil.

If you are concerned about MTBE pollution in your community, you can read the contents of the House Energy bill here.

Instead of burdening taxpayers in affected areas with the costs of removing MTBE from their drinking water, Weitz & Luxenberg will aggressively go after the oil companies responsible. We want to do what is best not only for our clients, but for the environment and future generations as well. You have a right to clean, safe drinking water, and Weitz & Luxenberg is a powerful ally to have on your side. If your municipality needs our help, please fill out this simple form.

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Name
Email
Phone Number
Best Time to Call
Please describe your MTBE contamination:
Has anyone else in yuor community had similar experiences with MTBE?
Additional Comments


see also:

Energy Policy Act HR 6: Energy Policy Act of 2005 - MTBE Victims threatened by Energy Act
MTBE Victims threatened by Energy Act: Energy Policy Act of 2005 (HR6)

Congress Debates Floor Statements on HR 6: MTBE related Energy Policy Act of 2005
The Floor Statements on MTBE related Energy Policy Act of 2005 (HR 6).

Learn More Protect Yourself from the Dangers of MTBE, Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether
Harmed by MTBE Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether? Let us fight for you.


Name Phone Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!   strictly confidential
Your Question

Click here
for a free case review



$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims

$25 million jury verdict — brake reliner

$5.8 million settlement — failure to perform timely C-Section

$30 million verdict — 7 former power-plant workers suffering from asbestos-related illnesses

$6 million settlement — pediatric malpractice case

$14 million consolidated verdict — 5 asbestos-related cancer suits: shipyards/powerhouses/construction

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$3.5 million — 2 asbestos exposure cases

$600,000 settlement — motor vehicle negligence resulting in serious injury

$44 million verdict — 5 asbestos cases, including $11.6 million awarded to widow of sheet metal worker who died of mesothelioma

$1.6 million settlement — suicide after premature hospital discharge

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$1.5 million settlement — construction worker fell off elevated train tracks

$750,000 settlement — defective construction equipment resulted in serious injury to worker



Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases, get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 20 years, we’ve collected more than $1.3 billion for plaintiffs.