The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Why Choose Us?   Results   Search

Pollutants MTBE Research Center

Controversy

in this section: What Big Oil Knew | Fighting Back Against Big Oil | Controversy | Developments | Lawsuit Victory | Contamination Solution


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page
Weitz & Luxenberg reviews MTBE cases related to water systems that require remediation. We are not litigating any personal injury claims involving MTBE.

The Controversy over MTBE
(methyl tertiary-butyl ether)

In the MTBE controversy, opponents of MTBE note that as an ether, MTBE has a chemical attraction to the water molecule and increases the solubility of other, harmful components of gasoline. Because of this, MTBE often ends up in drinking water, especially in cases where oil storage tanks leak near populated areas, and may make contamination by other compounds more likely. MTBE biodegrades very slowly, remaining in water for decades or more. The oil industry did not test MTBE for its effects on human health before approving it as an additive, as the EPA did not require such tests.

Advocates of MTBE use, such as the oil industry, contend that there are no harmful effects of MTBE in humans. They note that there are no reported cases of a person becoming sick from MTBE in drinking water. Although MTBE has been labelled a "potential human carcinogen" by the Environmental Protection Agency, no carcinogenic properties have been confirmed. Advocates also say that gasoline manufacturers have been forced to add MTBE to gasoline by law.

Opponents respond that any oxygenate would have fulfilled the law, and other, safer compounds (such as ethanol) are available. They claim that MTBE was used instead because it is made by adding methanol to isobutylene, a toxic chemical that the industry would otherwise have to find another way to dispose of.

The clean-up of all MTBE in the U.S. is estimated to cost as much as $140 billion, including breaking down the compound in municipal water supplies and repairing leaky underground oil tanks. Much of the controversy centers around who will have to pay the costs of this clean-up, if such a task is required.


Instead of burdening taxpayers in affected areas with the costs of removing MTBE from their drinking water, Weitz & Luxenberg will aggressively go after the oil companies responsible. We want to do what is best not only for our clients, but for the environment and future generations as well. You have a right to clean, safe drinking water, and Weitz & Luxenberg is a powerful ally to have on your side. If you or your municipality needs our help, please fill out this simple form, call us at (800) 476-6070 or email us at clientrelations@weitzlux.com.

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Name
Email
Phone Number
Best Time to Call
Please describe your MTBE contamination:
Has anyone else in yuor community had similar experiences with MTBE?
Additional Comments


see also:

Controversy MTBE Controversy
Learn about the MTBE controversy.

Developments MTBE bans under recent state laws
Recent state laws have been passed to ban MTBE in certain areas.

Learn More Protect Yourself from the Dangers of MTBE, Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether
Harmed by MTBE Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether? Let us fight for you.


Name Phone Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!   strictly confidential
Your Question

Click here
for a free case review



$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims

$25 million jury verdict — brake reliner

$5.8 million settlement — failure to perform timely C-Section

$30 million verdict — 7 former power-plant workers suffering from asbestos-related illnesses

$6 million settlement — pediatric malpractice case

$14 million consolidated verdict — 5 asbestos-related cancer suits: shipyards/powerhouses/construction

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$3.5 million — 2 asbestos exposure cases

$600,000 settlement — motor vehicle negligence resulting in serious injury

$44 million verdict — 5 asbestos cases, including $11.6 million awarded to widow of sheet metal worker who died of mesothelioma

$1.6 million settlement — suicide after premature hospital discharge

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$1.5 million settlement — construction worker fell off elevated train tracks

$750,000 settlement — defective construction equipment resulted in serious injury to worker



Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases, get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 20 years, we’ve collected more than $1.3 billion for plaintiffs.