The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Why Choose Us?   Results

Pollutants Superfund Sites Environmental Spotlight

FAQ about Nyanza

in this section: Ashland Lawsuit | History of Nyanza Dump | Textile Dye-Making Plant | Nyanza Lagoon and Pond Contamination | Contaminated Wetlands | Ashland High School | Ashland Cancer Cluster | Swimming in Ashland? | Legacy of Kevin Kane | FAQ about Nyanza | Fell in Lagoon | MA State Department of Health Report on Nyanza

Nyanza, Inc. - Frequently Asked Questions

Why is a health study being conducted in Ashland?

Recent information has been reported that children who lived and grew up in the town of Ashland and reported playing on the Nyanza site have developed similar types of rare cancers as young adults.

The current study was initiated due to the report of five young men from the same graduating class that have developed various types of sarcoma (rare types of cancers).

What is the Nyanza site and what types of contaminants were present?

The Nyanza site is the location of the former Nyanza Chemical Company, which operated a dye manufacturing facility in Ashland from 1965 until 1978.

The Nyanza Company was one of several former dye manufacturing companies located on Megunko Road that operated from 1917 to 1978.

More than 100 different types of dyes and dye by-products were produced at the site.

Some of the hazardous substances used at the site include acids, bases, semi-volatile organic compounds, and metals.

In 1983, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed the Nyanza site on the National Priorities List because of local soil and groundwater contamination from improper waste disposal.

Who was exposed to Nyanza site contamination and how did exposure occur?

The populations with the greatest potential for past exposure to hazardous substances used at Nyanza were on-site workers, nearby residents and workers, children who played at the site, and individuals who ate fish from nearby streams.

Children had opportunities for exposure to contaminants at the Nyanza site, particularly during the 1960s and 1970s before cleanup began.

In the past, human exposure occurred due to the following:

  • Breathing in the air emissions coming from the site,
  • Skin contact, accidental ingestion, or inhalation of site contaminants
  • Ingestion of contaminated fish, surface water and sediments from local waterways

Are there any current exposures to Nyanza contaminants that could affect my health?

Mercury contamination has been found at elevated levels in fish from the Sudbury River.

MDPH issued a health advisory for the Sudbury River in 1986. This advisory recommends that individuals, particularly pregnant woman, do not eat fish caught in the Sudbury River.

This health advisory is still in effect today.

Have any other studies been conducted on the Nyanza site?

Yes. In 1994, the MDPH in cooperation with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) conducted a health assessment for the Nyanza site.

The purpose of the public health assessment was to determine the possibility of adverse health impacts from past, current, and future exposures to contaminants from the site.

Information about environmental exposures, contaminant toxicology, community health concerns and cancer incidence data were evaluated.

What were the conclusions of the 1994 study?

Review of cancer incidence data indicated that the types of cancer associated with the chemicals used during dye manufacturing (bladder and kidney cancer), were consistent with the types of cancer observed to be more common in certain areas of Ashland.

As a result, the MDPH conducted a follow-up investigation, which included an evaluation of more recent cancer incidence data.

An expert panel reviewed this information, and upon completion, one panel concluded that the available evidence did not demonstrate that environmental contamination was responsible for the reported number of kidney and bladder cancer cases in Ashland.

It was also determined that because of probable past exposure, follow-up actions at the Nyanza site were indicated.

Specifically, the PHA recommended that community health education be conducted and that an epidemiological study be conducted to evaluate increased adverse health outcomes to residents of Ashland.

Why is the MDPH conducting a health study today?

Recent information has been reported that children and young adults who grew up in the town of Ashland and reported playing on the Nyanza site during the 1960s and 1970s have developed similar types of rare cancers as young adults.

The current study was initiated due to the report of five young men from the same graduating class that have developed various types of sarcoma.

Does the Nyanza site pose a public health hazard today?

No. The Nyanza site is currently not a public health hazard. The area north of the Nyanza site has been thoroughly investigated by the EPA.

The EPA has also initiated an aggressive cleanup plan to eliminate contamination from streams and wetlands that are leaching mercury into the Sudbury River.

People are however, at risk from past exposures.


see also:

FAQ about Nyanza Nyanza - Frequently Asked Questions
Nyanza - Frequently Asked Questions - Free Lawsuit Eval

Swimming in Ashland? Have you Swam in Ashland? You are at risk for Cancer
Those who swam in or exposed to waters in Ashland are at risk for cancer

Nyanza Plant Nyanza Plant-Learn more about the Nyanza Plant and its history
Nyanza Plant-Find out about the plant and the dangers it has caused


Name Phone Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!   strictly confidential
Your Question


$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims

$25 million jury verdict — brake reliner

$5.8 million settlement — failure to perform timely C-Section

$30 million verdict — 7 former power-plant workers suffering from asbestos-related illnesses

$6 million settlement — pediatric malpractice case

$14 million consolidated verdict — 5 asbestos-related cancer suits: shipyards/powerhouses/construction

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$3.5 million — 2 asbestos exposure cases

$600,000 settlement — motor vehicle negligence resulting in serious injury

$44 million verdict — 5 asbestos cases, including $11.6 million awarded to widow of sheet metal worker who died of mesothelioma

$1.6 million settlement — suicide after premature hospital discharge

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$1.5 million settlement — construction worker fell off elevated train tracks

$750,000 settlement — defective construction equipment resulted in serious injury to worker



Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases, get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 20 years, we’ve collected more than $1.3 billion for plaintiffs.