The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Why Choose Us?   Results   Search

Accident Lawyer Injuries On Property/Premises Research Center Learn More

Modern Law

in this section: English Common Law | Early American Law | Special Relationships | Foreseeability | Modern Law


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

Totality of circumstances

In the 1980's, courts began critically examining the prior similar incidents rule and, over the next decade, the majority of American jurisdictions abandoned it in favor of a "totality of the circumstances" test. In other words, although prior similar incidents would be one factor that a court would consider in determining whether a crime was foreseeable, the court would look to other factors as well, such as the nature of the business, its surrounding locale, the lack of customary security precautions as an invitation to crime, and the experience of the particular landowner at other locations.

Property owners have been critical of the totality of the circumstances test because of their belief that it is an impossible standard, i.e., that any time a crime occurs, one can argue that the security was necessarily inadequate. What is often overlooked in the analysis, however, is that this test is not whether security was inadequate in any abstract sense, but whether the inadequacies were unreasonable and below generally accepted standards for a particular industry. Furthermore, the deficiency must have been a substantial contributing factor to the incident.

The lack of prior similar crimes does not render it impossible to take reasonable precautions to prevent crimes that most would agree were reasonably foreseeable. Crime prevention experts, for example, routinely develop proactive security plans for premises on which crime has not yet occurred, relying on all the circumstances to predict reasonably foreseeable crime and develop reasonable precautions against it. Therefore, if property owners take no such precautions, their good fortune in not having any prior crimes is not to their benefit when the first unfortunate victim brings a claim.


see also:

Foreseeability Premises Liability Lawsuit History - Get your FREE Case Evaluation
Premises Liability Lawsuit History: Crime victims sue property owners.

Special Relationships Premises Liability Lawsuit History - Get your FREE Case Evaluation
Premises Liability Lawsuit History: Crime victims sue property owners.

Premises Liability case overview Premises Liability - Get your FREE Case Evaluation
An overview of Premises Liability Cases. Find out if you have a case.


Name Phone Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!   strictly confidential
Your Question

Click here
for a free case review



$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims

$25 million jury verdict — brake reliner

$5.8 million settlement — failure to perform timely C-Section

$30 million verdict — 7 former power-plant workers suffering from asbestos-related illnesses

$6 million settlement — pediatric malpractice case

$14 million consolidated verdict — 5 asbestos-related cancer suits: shipyards/powerhouses/construction

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$3.5 million — 2 asbestos exposure cases

$600,000 settlement — motor vehicle negligence resulting in serious injury

$44 million verdict — 5 asbestos cases, including $11.6 million awarded to widow of sheet metal worker who died of mesothelioma

$1.6 million settlement — suicide after premature hospital discharge

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$1.5 million settlement — construction worker fell off elevated train tracks

$750,000 settlement — defective construction equipment resulted in serious injury to worker



Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases, get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 20 years, we’ve collected more than $1.3 billion for plaintiffs.