The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Contact Us   Verdicts   Search


Tracking Labels

in this section: Bankruptcy | Duty to Warn | Tracking Labels | Reverse Bifurcation | Time-Barred Claims | Negligence vs. Malpractice | Spoliation


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

CHILDREN’S PRODUCTS MUST NOW HAVE TRACKING LABELS, By Alani Golanski

Manufacturers sometimes have trouble finding products that were recalled; more importantly, parents can’t always easily identify recalled products. To address these problems, the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) requires manufacturers to affix permanent tracking labels to most children’s products. Manufacturers vigorously opposed this improvement, but the Consumer Product Safety Commission stuck to August 14, 2009, as the effective date for the new tracking label requirements.

The tracking label requirement applies to products manufactured after the August 14, 2009 date. To be deemed adequate and in compliance, any such tracking labels must enable the manufacturer and the consumer to ascertain the following product information:

  • Name of the manufacturer or private labeler;
  • Date (or date range) of production;
  • Location of production (country, state and city is sufficient for the label, but the manufacturer must also know the building);
  • Cohort information (e.g., batch, run number or other identifying characteristic);
  • Other information that would allow the manufacturer to determine the source of the product.

    Beyond these requirements, the Act doesn’t require a uniform system for labeling. But each manufacturer is charged with making “a reasonable judgment about what information can be marked on their product and packaging, given the character and type of their product and packaging, and what required information can be ascertainable, given the character and type of their business.” And there are some exceptions to the labeling requirement, of course, such as for certain disposable packages (if there’s a label visible through the packaging on the product itself), vending machine products, and where aesthetically or structurally impracticable.

    But despite the various exceptions, the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act is an improvement that has now gone into effect, and that will permit parents to safeguard their children’s well-being with greater certainty.


  • see also:

    Duty to Warn A SELLER’S DUTY TO WARN OF DANGEROUS POST-SALE COMPONENTS – PART 1
    Hazards associated with third-party components | Duty to Warn

    Tracking Labels Article: Children's Products Must Now Have Tracking Labels | Golanski
    Manufacturers must affix tracking labels to most children’s products

    Articles Archive Firm Library: Read Articles Written by Weitz & Luxenberg Attorneys
    Articles about recent decisions and news involving our litigations

    Name
    Phone
    Email
    Do you have a legal question? Ask us!    strictly confidential
    Your Question
    • MESOTHELIOMA
      • Mesothelioma Treatment
      • Mesothelioma Symptoms
      • Lung Cancer
      • Help for Veterans
      • Asbestos Exposure
      • Your Legal Options
      • Mesothelioma Lawyer
      • Asbestos Cancer
    • DEFECTIVE MEDICINES AND DEVICES
        Actos
        DePuy Hip
        Fosamax
      • Accutane
      • Avandia
      • Depakote
      • Gadolinium
      • Hydroxycut
      • Paxil Birth Defects
      • Qui Tam
      • Reglan
      • Shoulder Pain Pumps
      • Topamax
      • Pelvic Mesh
      • Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella
      • Zimmer Durom
      • Zimmer NexGen-CR Flex Porous Femoral component
      • Zimmer LPS-Flex
      • Zoloft Birth Defects
    • ENTERTAINMENT LAW
      • Intellectual Property
      • Creative Rights
      • Royalties
      • Licensing Fees
      • Breach of Contract
      • Fraud
    • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
      • Arsenic
      • Benzene
      • Chromium
      • Dioxins
      • Gulf Oil Spill
      • Landfill Odors
      • Lead Poisoning
      • Mercury Poisoning
      • Pesticides
      • Petroleum Spills
      • PCB
      • Property Damage
      • Radium
      • TCE
      • Water Contamination
      • Vapor Intrusion
    • ACCIDENTS
      • Auto Accident
      • Car Accident
      • Elevator Accident
      • Truck Accident
      • Workplace Accident
      • Pedestrian Knock-down
      • Bicyclist Collision
      • Motorcycle Collision
      • Single-Car Collision
      • Toyota Recall
      • Two-Car Collision
      • Multi-Car Collision
    • PERSONAL INJURY
      • Aviation
      • Back Injury
      • Birth Defects
      • Burn Injury
      • Brain Injury
      • Eye Injury
      • Life Insurance Law
      • Nursing Home Abuse
      • Spinal Cord Injury
      • Wrongful Death
      • Product Liability
      • Assault
      • Battery
      • Dog Bite
      • Stray Electricity
    • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
      • New York Medical Malpractice
      • Anesthesia Complications
      • Birth Injury
      • Brachial Plexus Palsy
      • Cancer Misdiagnosis
      • Cerebral Palsy
      • Death
      • Erb’s Palsy
      • Failure to Diagnose
      • Foreign Object
      • Hospital Error
      • Hydrocephalus
      • Informed Consent
      • Medication Error
      • Pain and Suffering
      • Paraplegia
      • Podiatric Malpractice
      • Quadriplegia
      • Surgical Error
    Name:
    Phone:
    Email:
    Case Description:


    $423 million settlement
    MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally
    $16.5 million verdict
    Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape
    $1.4 million settlement
    Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance
    $1.5 million settlement
    for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks
    $6 million settlement
    Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth
    $53 million verdict
    brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma
    $13.5 million verdict
    one of the very first Vioxx trial cases
    $15 million settlement
    man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care
    $37 million verdict
    2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs
    $47 million verdict
    boilermaker who died from mesothelioma
    $2.6 million settlement
    ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers
    $75 million verdict
    historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s
    $8 million settlement
    obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits
    $64.65 million award
    4 asbestos plaintiffs
    $17.5 million
    consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims
    Ask a Free Question:
    Were you injured?
    check for your response [login]
    For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
    A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases,

    get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 25 years, we’ve collected more than $7 billion for plaintiffs.

    Copyright © 2012 Weitz & Luxenberg, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

    Wi3 Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
    HOME | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP | CONTACT US |NEWS CENTER | CAREERS