The Story Of Our Firm | En Français | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Contact Us   Verdicts   Search

Previous Investigations Other Litigations Vioxx Research Center

Publications

in this section: Links & Numbers | Active Lawsuits | Publications | Vioxx Clinical Trials


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

What You Need to Know About Vioxx From Medical Journal Publications

Medical journals and publications have studied the side effects of Vioxx, Aspirin and Vioxx, Arthrotec, Vioxx with Asthma and other important topics. The medical journal abstracts below can help you understand the serious issues. If you need further help, please fill out this simple form, call our client relations department at 1 (800) 476-6070, or email us at clientrelations@weitzlux.com.

March-April 2004

“Acute Congestive Heart Failure Induced by Rofecoxib.” JABFP

By Robert J. Campbell, MD, and Kevin B. Sneed, PharmD

Although NSAIDs are prescribed for the treatment of inflammatory conditions as well as for chronic pains, they have the potential to cause harmful side effects. A case is mentioned involving a 42-year-old woman who suffered from acute congestive heart failure secondary to Rofecoxib. Prior to taking Rofecoxib, the patient suffered no symptoms of congestive heart failure. Once she stopped taking Rofecoxib, she was quick to recover from all symptoms associated with congestive heart failure. It has been decided, based on clinical discussion and review of literature that the cause of acute congestive heart failure is most likely caused by increasing the dosage of Rofecoxib to 50 mg after previously being treated with a dosage of 25 mg.



7 October 2004

“Coxib Cardio Risks: Case Effect?.” EU health regulators reviewing long-term data for all Cox-2 inhibitors; U.S. researchers cite evidence for class risk, blast inaction on rofecoxib.

By Ed Lamb, Pharmacy Today

Due to the worldwide withdrawal of Rofecoxib, administered by Merck, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) will review the long term data on cardiovascular safety for all licensed Cox-2 inhibitors. Pfizer, the makers of Celebrex and Bextra (also Cox-2 agents), is denying that any of there drugs contain similar risks as Rofecoxib. However, Garrett A. Fitzgerald, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania claims in an article posted to the NEJM that all coxibs have the same risks for adverse cardiovascular events. Fitzgerald notes in a soon-to-be published article that all Cox-2 inhibitors raise the risk of developing MI and thrombotic strokes. Eric J. Topol, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation also wrote an article titled “Failing the Public Health—Rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA.” In his article, Topol discusses the need for a congressional investigation of Merck and the FDA.



5 February 2004

“Relationship Between Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors and Acute Myocardial Infarction in Older Adults.”

By Daniel H. Solomon, MD, MPH; Sebastian Schneeweiss, MD, ScD; Robert J. Glynn, PHD, ScD; Yuka Kiyoya, MD, MPH; Raisa Levin, mSc; Helen Mogun, MSc; Jerry Avorn, MD.

A study is being conducted to test whether Cox-2 inhibitors, which originally were developed to decrease the amount of gastrointestinal problems that is caused by nonselective NSAIDs, actually increases the risk of cardiovascular conditions. Users of Celecoxib (celebrex), Rofecoxib (Vioxx), and NSAIDs were tested to see whether there was a risk of developing acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The study included 54,475 patients over the age of 65. It concluded that Rofecoxib linked to greater risks of AMI compared with Celecoxib. The higher risk of AMI caused by Rofecoxib was much greater when a patient was taking dosages of 25 mg or more.



24 February 2003

“Effect of Selective Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors and Naproxen on Short-term Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Elderly.”

By Muhammad Mamdani, PharmD, MA, MPH; Paula Rochon, MD, MPH; David N. Juurlink, MD; Geoffrey M. Anderson, MD, PhD, Alex Kopp, BA; Gary Naglie, MD; Peter C. Austin, PhD; Andreas Laupacis, MD, MSc

A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing the rates of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) among elderly patients given selective Cox-2 inhibitors, naproxen, and nonselective NSAIDs. There was no increase in short term risk of AMI among users of selective Cox-2 inhibitors. Additionally, there was no conclusion that found a short-term reduced risk of AMI with naproxen.



September 2002

“Do Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors Increase Risk of Cardiovascular Thrombotic Events?’

By Brent Kvern, MD, CCFP, FCFP

Dr. Brent Kvern, MD commented on an article written by Steven D Mukherjee and EJ Topol titled “Risk of Cardiovascular Events Associated with Selective Cox-2 Inhibitors.” This was a systematic review and descriptive subgroup analysis. The question presented asks whether patients who take Cox inhibitors suffer from more cardiovascular events than patients who do not. Kvern cautions the readers by saying that more trials need to be administered to determine the degree of risk associated with COX inhibitors. Although COX inhibitors lead to a reduced risk of GI side effects, there is an increased rate of thrombosis.



5 May 2004

“Rofecoxib, a COX-2 Inhibitor , Lowers C-Reactive Protein and Interleukin-6 Levels in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.”

By Daniel Monakier, MD; Michael Mates, MD; Marc W. Klutstein, MD; Jonathan a. Balkin, MBBS; Bernard Rudensky, MD; David Meerkin, MBBS; and Dan Tzivoni, MD.

Patients suffering from acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have high levels of inflammatory mediators such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin (IL)-6. The aim of the study was to determine whether patients taking Rofecoxib to treat ACS will have reduced CRP, IL-6, and soluble tumor necrotic factor receptor-1 (sTNF-R1) levels and greater endothelial function with aspirin. For a period of three months, 34 patients who were hospitalized with ACS were administered 25 mg of rofecoxib plus aspirin or a placebo plus aspirin. There was a decrease in the CRP level among the rofecoxib group that took aspirin. However, a large scale study will be needed for follow-up of these results.

Weitz & Luxenberg can help you with your Vioxx claim

The lawyers at Weitz & Luxenberg are now accepting clients who have been injured by Vioxx. If you have taken Vioxx and have suffered a stroke, heart attack, or other cardiovascular event, please contact Weitz & Luxenberg for a free case evaluation. You can fill out this simple form, call us at 1 (800) 476-6070, or email us at clientrelations@weitzlux.com.

Weitz & Luxenberg is no longer accepting Vioxx cases.


see also:

Active Lawsuits Read about active Mass Tort and Class Action Vioxx Lawsuits
Know about current Class Action Vioxx Lawsuits and see how we can help

Publications Serious Vioxx issues direct from medical journal Publications
Concerned with important health issues? Check Publications on Vioxx

Frequently Asked Questions Are you at risk? Here are Frequently Asked Questions regarding Vioxx
A list of some of the Frequently Asked Questions regarding Vioxx

Name
Phone
Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!    strictly confidential
Your Question
  • MESOTHELIOMA
    • Mesothelioma Treatment
    • Mesothelioma Symptoms
    • Lung Cancer
    • Help for Veterans
    • Asbestos Exposure
    • Your Legal Options
    • Mesothelioma Lawyer
    • Asbestos Cancer
  • DEFECTIVE MEDICINES AND DEVICES
      Actos
      DePuy Hip
      Fosamax
    • Accutane
    • Avandia
    • Depakote
    • Gadolinium
    • Hydroxycut
    • Paxil Birth Defects
    • Qui Tam
    • Reglan
    • Shoulder Pain Pumps
    • Topamax
    • Pelvic Mesh
    • Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella
    • Zimmer Durom
    • Zimmer NexGen-CR Flex Porous Femoral component
    • Zimmer LPS-Flex
    • Zoloft Birth Defects
  • ENTERTAINMENT LAW
    • Intellectual Property
    • Creative Rights
    • Royalties
    • Licensing Fees
    • Breach of Contract
    • Fraud
  • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
    • Arsenic
    • Benzene
    • Chromium
    • Dioxins
    • Gulf Oil Spill
    • Landfill Odors
    • Lead Poisoning
    • Mercury Poisoning
    • Pesticides
    • Petroleum Spills
    • PCB
    • Property Damage
    • Radium
    • TCE
    • Water Contamination
    • Vapor Intrusion
  • ACCIDENTS
    • Auto Accident
    • Car Accident
    • Elevator Accident
    • Truck Accident
    • Workplace Accident
    • Pedestrian Knock-down
    • Bicyclist Collision
    • Motorcycle Collision
    • Single-Car Collision
    • Toyota Recall
    • Two-Car Collision
    • Multi-Car Collision
  • PERSONAL INJURY
    • Aviation
    • Back Injury
    • Birth Defects
    • Burn Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Eye Injury
    • Life Insurance Law
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Product Liability
    • Assault
    • Battery
    • Dog Bite
    • Stray Electricity
  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
    • New York Medical Malpractice
    • Anesthesia Complications
    • Birth Injury
    • Brachial Plexus Palsy
    • Cancer Misdiagnosis
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Death
    • Erb’s Palsy
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Foreign Object
    • Hospital Error
    • Hydrocephalus
    • Informed Consent
    • Medication Error
    • Pain and Suffering
    • Paraplegia
    • Podiatric Malpractice
    • Quadriplegia
    • Surgical Error
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:


$423 million settlement
MTBE suit involving the contamination of 153 public water systems nationally
$16.5 million verdict
Asbestos case involving exposure from dental tape
$1.4 million settlement
Accident involving woman struck down by ambulance
$1.5 million settlement
for 47-year-old construction worker who fell off elevated train tracks
$6 million settlement
Pediatric malpractice involving infant who suffered brain damage at birth
$53 million verdict
brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma
$13.5 million verdict
one of the very first Vioxx trial cases
$15 million settlement
man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care
$37 million verdict
2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs
$47 million verdict
boilermaker who died from mesothelioma
$2.6 million settlement
ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers
$75 million verdict
historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s
$8 million settlement
obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits
$64.65 million award
4 asbestos plaintiffs
$17.5 million
consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?
check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases,

get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 25 years, we’ve collected more than $7 billion for plaintiffs.

Copyright © 2012 Weitz & Luxenberg, 700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

Wi3 Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
HOME | DISCLAIMER | SITE MAP | CONTACT US |NEWS CENTER | CAREERS