The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Choose Us   Settlements   Search

Drugs & Medical Devices Vioxx Research Center

Learn More

in this section: Super Asprin Gone Wrong | Side Effects | Recall | FDA Regulation


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page


BREAKING NEWS: April 25, 2008--A Class I recall was issued by Actavis Totowa LLC for all lots of the heart medicine Digitek (generic name digoxin) because some have been found to contain twice the approved levels of active ingredient than is appropriate. Read on for more.

Learn More About Vioxx and Find an Experienced Weitz and Luxenberg Lawyer That Can Help

VIOXX® (rofecoxib), a popular anti-inflammatory drug manufactured by Merck &Co. Inc., is used for the treatment of arthritis and pain, most commonly for the treatment of acute and chronic osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, relief of pain in adults and treatment of menstrual discomfort.

Weitz & Luxenberg is the law firm that won the second major Vioxx lawsuit against Merck for a Vioxx heart attack victim in Atlantic City, a jury verdict of $13.5 Million. If you or a loved one has experienced a serious injury such as a heart attack or stroke after taking Vioxx, fill out this simple form for a FREE case evaluation from a Weitz and Luxenberg lawyer.

Vioxx has been distributed to over 20 million American citizens and 105 million prescriptions have been written world-wide.

In 2003, sales for Vioxx totaled 2.5 billion dollars.

On September 30th, 2004, Merck recalled Vioxx from the market after studies showed an increased risk of heart attacks, strokes, and other cardiovascular events in patients who had taken it, especially for longer than 18 months.

Recent evidence has shown that Merck & Co., Inc. knew and understood the cardiovascular risks Vioxx posed before the drug was ever put on the market.

Regardless of the consequences Vioxx may have posed for patients taking this drug, Merck continued to promote Vioxx with a gross marketing budget of $500 million.

October 6th, 2004, the Wall Street Journal reported the drug may have been the cause of 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before it was removed from the market.

People who have suffered injuries such as heart attacks and strokes after taking Vioxx for a prolonged period of time have filed suit on the grounds that Merck failed to fully reveal the dangerous side effects of the drug.

Individuals who have suffered a heart attack, stroke, or other cardiovascular event after taking Vioxx, and families who have suffered a loss after a loved one has taken the drug may be eligible to file a claim against Merck & Co. Inc.


Weitz & Luxenberg is now accepting clients who have been injured by Vioxx. If you have taken Vioxx and have suffered a stroke, heart attack, or other cardiovascular event, please contact Weitz & Luxenberg for a free case evaluation. Click here to complete our Vioxx questionnaire.

Weitz & Luxenberg is no longer accepting Vioxx cases.


see also:

Super Asprin Gone Wrong Vioxx - Super-Aspirin Gone Wrong
Once hailed as a "super-aspirin", Vioxx is now known to be dangerous

Side Effects Are you at Risk for Dangerous Vioxx Side Effects? Find out here.
Vioxx Side Effects: Heart Attack & Stroke are among the Most Dangerous

News & Warnings The latest news about Vioxx and Merck you must know
Get recent Vioxx News and Warnings from the 2nd Vioxx Lawsuit winners

Free Legal Review:
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Case Description:



For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims