Your Vioxx Lawyer - Vioxx, Celebrex & Bextra FDA Transcript

Your Vioxx lawyer provides you the complete transcript of the February 16^th, 2005 joint meeting of the FDA's Arthritis Advisory Committee and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee. We have formatted the complete transcript of the three day conference for easy of navigation to provide you with the best possible vioxx information. To contact a Vioxx Lawyer, click here for a FREE case evaluation.

Bayer and Roche Joint Presentation on Naproxen

DR. BAUM: Good evening. My name is Len Baum. On behalf of Hoffmann La-Roche and Bayer HealthCare, I would like to thank the advisory committee and the FDA for allowing us to come before you today to talk about naproxen.

Roche and Bayer would like to share what we know about the issues and provide information on the large body of data that can help the FDA and the advisory committee in their review. We also would like to help reassure consumers and healthcare professionals about the safety of naproxen.

Today we will provide a summary of the information from our briefing book and we will quickly go through some of the information that both Roche and Bayer jointly submitted. The information comes from over 30 years of clinical and marketing experience. We will provide a very brief overview of the history of the product, and we will quickly go through some of the properties of naproxen since a lot has been covered today. I will briefly touch on the ADAPT trial and then spend most of the time on the safety evaluation that has been conducted.

Along with me today is Dr. Martin Huber who is the Vice President and Global Head of Drug Safety and Risk Management for Hoffmann La-Roche. We also have a number of people from each of our companies to assist us should we have any questions at the end of the presentation. And, a couple of outside experts also, Dr. Kay Brune and Dr. Ian Grainek who could also assist should there be questions at the end of the presentation.

Naproxen has been available for over 28 years now. The prescription was approved in 1976 for a number of indications that you see up here on the board. It is available by a number of manufacturers today for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, dysmenorrhea, bursitis and the other indications that are listed.

In 1994 Aleve was approved as the over-the-counter version. That came before an advisory committee who looked at the data and then was ultimately approved by the FDA via an NDA. The indications are listed up there and it is currently marketed by Bayer HealthCare for the temporary relief of minor aches and pains, and also for reduction of fever.

I wish to note here that naproxen is safe and effective for these indications when used according to the labeling directions.

Quickly going through this and just to lay the groundwork for the rest of the presentation, we did talk today extensively about the class of NSAIDs, and naproxen has its anti-inflammatory, analgesic and anti-pyretic properties. It is also known to inhibit platelet aggregation, as we heard, with the major differences between the members of the class being potency and pharmacokinetics, and this includes duration of action.

Just to set the stage and to remind everyone, the class of NSAIDs is fairly large. The one thing I would like to point out is that coxibs as well as the propionic acid class are listed as part of the NSAID class. We have heard a lot today of NSAIDs versus coxibs but this is a large class. Within the class of the propionic acids is naproxen under the form Aleve also for over-the-counter, ibuprofen, Advil, motrin. So, there are a large number of products that we use every day for both Rx and OTC.

What is the relevance of what we are looking at with naproxen? This compound has been well documented with a long history. It is referenced, as you have heard today, for many analgesic clinical trials. Naproxen as well as other selective NSAIDs are important treatment options for a broad range of patients and conditions. As we look at this data, we must also consider not just the safety data but also the efficacy, as has been mentioned a number of times today.

The data that has been submitted in our briefing document covers a considerable amount of patient exposure and experience. I am going to draw upon our safety discussion today, information from clinical trials, observational studies and postmarketing information. From the Rx side we will draw from over 110 billion patient use. From the OTC side, over 550 billion, and this is courses of therapy. We have listed this as 2 tablets a day for 10 days.

When we look at the totality of the data, we have not seen any safety signals related to myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, and as we look closely now at ADAPT, what I am going to do is just highlight a couple of the points, and I do this more to let you know how this fits into the spectrum of the data that we have been presenting and will discuss today.

One point is that it is an NIH-sponsored trial. Bayer provided product, naproxen, for investigational use. It was a 3-arm study comparing naproxen celecoxib and placebo. The patient population included 1200 patients. We don't know the exact breakout of these but I want to point out that it was a 2:1 placebo to the investigational drug examination. So, it is not 2400 patients on any one drug. Patients were 70 years of age and older, and it was being looked for as the prevention of Alzheimer's disease. The study began in 2001 and was planned for 7 years. It was suspended after 3 years. One thing about the patient population I would like to point out is that these patients did have a familial history of dementia or Alzheimer's.

What is on this slide are events that have been publicly reported leading up to the suspension of ADAPT. On December 10 the data safety review board did not recommend stopping the ADAPT trial. In fact, the same safety board reviewed the data at least twice over the past three years and each of the times did not recommend stopping the trial.

On December 17 the APC trial was suspended due to an indication in cardiovascular/cerebrovascular risk of celecoxib versus placebo. Although there was no significant risk for celecoxib, the ADAPT trial was suspended in part due to the APC findings and this was released as part of the NIH statement. So, on December 20th the NEI announced the ADAPT trial suspension. This information was released to the public by the study group and it was based on preliminary findings, not through the peer reviewed journals.

Some of these data may be discussed on Friday by the NEI. We do not have that information and will not be covering that in our presentation. I put this up to at least bridge into the data that we will be covering on the safety analysis, and to help put that into its perspective.

In summary, at this point naproxen is a non-selective COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor. It is widely used, with over 22 million patients using the product each year. It has an established safety profile with over 30 years of both clinical and marketing experience. It is used as a reference standard for many of the trials we have heard about, and the unadjudicated preliminary findings of ADAPT, and for that matter the final findings of ADAPT, will need to be put into the context of the wide body of data that is available on naproxen to date.

At this point I would like to introduce Dr. Martin Huber who will review the totality of the safety data that supports the lack of myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular signals with naproxen.

Weitz & Luxenberg is no longer accepting Vioxx cases.

see also:

Bayer/Roche: Naproxen Your Vioxx Lawyer - Vioxx, Celebrex & Bextra FDA Transcript - Bayer, Roche: Naproxen
Your Vioxx lawyer provides the complete transcript of the FDA meeting.

Regulatory History Your Vioxx Lawyer - Vioxx, Celebrex & Bextra FDA Transcript - Regulatory History
Your Vioxx lawyer provides the complete transcript of the FDA meeting.

FDA Transcript - Day 1 Conference for Safety - Vioxx, Celebrex & Bextra FDA Transcript
Read here for the complete transcript of the FDA meeting for Vioxx