The Story Of Our Firm | En Español
 Home    Lawyers   Litigation   Why Choose Us?   Results   Search

Environmental Pollution PVC Plastic Research Center

FDA Warning

in this section: FDA Warning | In Your Area


Bookmark This Page Print This Page Email This Page

FDA Public Health Notification: PVC Devices Containing the Plasticizer DEHP

The following advisory has been taken from the FDA website regarding PVC and its dangers. If you or a loved one has suffered due to the hazards of PVC, you can recieve a fee case evalution bu filling out this simple form today.

Devices Affected

PVC is a plastic polymer that is used in a wide array of products. Unplasticized PVC is hard and brittle at room temperature. A plasticizer (softener) is typically added to increase the flexibility of the polymer. DEHP is the plasticizer for most PVC medical devices.

Devices that may contain DEHP-plasticized PVC include:

  • intravenous (IV) bags and tubing
  • umbilical artery catheters
  • blood bags and infusion tubing
  • enteral nutrition feeding bags
  • nasogastric tubes
  • peritoneal dialysis bags and tubing
  • tubing used in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures
  • tubing used in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
  • tubing used during hemodialysis

Nature of the Problem

Everyone is exposed to small levels of DEHP in everyday life. However, some individuals can be exposed to high levels of DEHP through certain medical procedures. DEHP can leach out of plastic medical devices into solutions that come in contact with the plastic. The amount of DEHP that will leach out depends on the temperature, the lipid content of the liquid, and the duration of contact with the plastic. Seriously ill individuals often require more than one of these procedures, thus exposing them to even higher levels of DEHP.

Exposure to DEHP has produced a range of adverse effects in laboratory animals, but of greatest concern are effects on the development of the male reproductive system and production of normal sperm in young animals. We have not received reports of these adverse events in humans, but there have been no studies to rule them out. However, in view of the available animal data, precautions should be taken to limit the exposure of the developing male to DEHP.

Risk determinants

Two factors determine the degree of risk posed by exposure to DEHP in a medical setting. The first is the patient's sensitivity to DEHP. Based on the evidence cited above, the male fetus, male neonate, and peripubertal male would appear to be high-risk groups. The second factor is the dose of DEHP received by the patient. This is determined largely by the type of procedure performed, as well as the frequency and duration of these procedures.

Highest risk procedures

We examined the potential risk of exposure posed to patients by comparing the dose of DEHP that patients might receive during various procedures to a "Tolerable Intake" (TI) value for the compound.

The following procedures have been identified as posing the highest risk of exposure to DEHP:

  • exchange transfusion in neonates
  • ECMO in neonates
  • total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) in neonates (with lipids in PVC bag)
  • multiple procedures in sick neonates (high cumulative exposure)
  • hemodialysis in peripubertal males
  • hemodialysis in pregnant or lactating women
  • enteral nutrition in neonates and adults
  • heart transplantation or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (aggregate dose)
  • massive infusion of blood into trauma patient
  • transfusion in adults undergoing ECMO

In contrast, there is little or no risk posed by patient exposure to the amount of DEHP released from PVC IV bags during the infusion of crystalloid fluids (e.g., normal saline, D5W, Ringer's Lactate). Further, there is little risk posed by exposure to the amount of DEHP released from PVC bags used to store and administer drugs that require a pharmaceutical vehicle for solubilization, when label instructions are followed.

Recommendations

Most importantly, you should not avoid the procedures cited above simply because of the possibility of health risks associated with DEHP exposure. The risk of not doing a needed procedure is far greater than the risk associated with exposure to DEHP.

For some of the above procedures, PVC devices that do not contain DEHP can be substituted, or devices made of other materials (such as ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), silicone, polyethylene or polyurethane) can be used, if available. If PVC devices containing DEHP must be used, you may be able to minimize exposure to DEHP by, for example, using the freshest possible blood products stored at the lowest possible temperature, or by using heparin-coated ECMO circuits.

We recommend considering such alternatives when these high-risk procedures are to be performed on male neonates, pregnant women who are carrying male fetuses, and peripubertal males. One source for identifying alternative devices that do not contain DEHP-plasticized PVC is http://www.sustainablehospitals.org, associated with the University of Massachusetts Lowell.

For other patient groups, who are presumably at lower risk, the decision to use DEHP alternatives must take into account the medical advantages and drawbacks of the substitute materials and their availability.

Click To Talk To Us Online

Please complete the following questionnaire:

Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Best Time to Call:
How were you exposed to PVC?
Please Describe your PVC Injury:
How did you hear about Weitz & Luxenberg?
Additional Comments


see also:

FDA Warning PVC Plastic FDA Warning Polyvinyl Chloride
PVC Polyvinyl Chloride - FDA Warning - Environmental Pollution

News & Warnings PVC Plastic Lawsuit Info - Polyvinyl Chloride - FREE Resource Center
PVC Polyvinyl Chloride- Environmental Pollution News & Warnings Info


Name Phone Email
Do you have a legal question? Ask us!   strictly confidential
Your Question

Click here
for a free case review



$53 million verdict — brake mechanic suffering from mesothelioma

$13.5 million verdict — one of the very first Vioxx trial cases

$15 million settlement — man wound up a paraplegic due to negligent hospital care

$37 million verdict — 2 asbestos lung cancer plaintiffs

$47 million verdict — boilermaker who died from mesothelioma

$75 million verdict — historic consolidated trial involving men who had worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard in the 1940s and 1950s

$12.7 million verdict — iron worker who was injured due to unsafe working conditions

$64.65 million award — 4 asbestos plaintiffs

$17.5 million — consolidated trial of 5 mesothelioma victims

$25 million jury verdict — brake reliner

$5.8 million settlement — failure to perform timely C-Section

$30 million verdict — 7 former power-plant workers suffering from asbestos-related illnesses

$6 million settlement — pediatric malpractice case

$14 million consolidated verdict — 5 asbestos-related cancer suits: shipyards/powerhouses/construction

$8 million settlement — obstetrical malpractice resulted in neurological deficits

$3.5 million — 2 asbestos exposure cases

$600,000 settlement — motor vehicle negligence resulting in serious injury

$44 million verdict — 5 asbestos cases, including $11.6 million awarded to widow of sheet metal worker who died of mesothelioma

$1.6 million settlement — suicide after premature hospital discharge

$2.6 million settlement — ill-fitting prosthesis caused decubitus ulcers

$1.5 million settlement — construction worker fell off elevated train tracks

$750,000 settlement — defective construction equipment resulted in serious injury to worker



Ask a Free Question:
Were you injured?

check for your response [login]
For legal help anywhere in the U.S.
A nationally-recognized personal injury law firm, Weitz & Luxenberg is committed to helping clients win cases, get the compensation to which they’re entitled and continue with their lives. In just over 20 years, we’ve collected more than $1.3 billion for plaintiffs.